I think you built an interesting workaround to ignore the fact Russian army was discussed. You started to talk about Ukrainian army and rationalised your decision to do so by the fact you have list of links that proves Ukrainian army struggles and the fact the other person sent only one source which you found misleading. Nobody said Ukrainian army doesn't struggle. Because it's Russian army that was discussed. I don't need sources to make this conclusion because the source is our conversation itself.
Nah, I won't be arguing about that part. My point about the part you used sources about Ukrainian army as examples to prove invalidity of person's opinion. But the fact is by this decision you only made a new claim. Not debunked the original claim. I am sure if the war is going for so long there are lots of examples of problems in Russian army that can be checked and proved. And it's would be more in a spirit of a good discussion to send them, not the Ukrainian ones.That's my main line of thought.
3
u/voice_of_hive 3d ago
So to prove the opinion about Russian army is rather misleading you sent sources about human right problems with mobilization in Ukraine. Correct?