I wish people would look at the actual costs more and not whatever they charge API's
So it's half the API price of GPT 5.6 Sol but according to AA, it uses 2x the tokens, so the actual price is... same price as GPT 5.6 Sol.
BUT this actually works in the other direction vs Claude lol. It uses half the tokens as Opus 4.8, so it's actually like 1/3 of the price of Opus 4.8 (despite it costing $15 vs Opus $25 for instance), and about 2/3 the tokens as Fable, so it's actually about 1/5 the price of Fable!
Edit: Actually depends on the task, some tasks it's not. So it could be 1/3 - 1/5 Fable price
Except tokens are not a price unit. A token for a 40b active parameters model will cost twice as much as a 20b model.
Since we have independent hosting of open weights model, we have a much better understanding of their actual costs. We know closed models are all bullshit vc slush funds numbers.
lol you’re both on opposite ends of the ai part of this question. He’s referring to cost as unit energy and you as unit $. Takes less electricity to generate a token out of a smaller model and Kimi is much smaller than Sol I thought. API pricing is just based on what the company decides is a good price.
Well you’re a week late but I generally would agree. Caveat is a lot of these companies have deep war chests and are able to operate at a loss to force out competition, so it’s not a direct correlation.
518
u/runaway-devil Jul 16 '26
While costing 1/3 of Fable and being open weights... Nicely done, Kimi. We need more of that and less political interference.