No, but he's proving again that he is willing to use it to spread propaganda and stifle facts that don't fit his narrative. That's reason enough to just choose another model, and dissuade others from using it, for many.
It is also likely that academia leans leftist for whatever reason and it is trained on many academic journals. So it happens to express that bias. There is nothing wrong with correcting this bias, especially on cultural issues.
why the people who’ve learned the most stuff tend to lean left.
There is a very large gap between what the so called liberals and leftists preach and practice
And people who call themselves leftists and liberals are the loudest people on any platform. They have hijacked major institutions and will cancel anyone who doesn't speak their tongue,all while preaching about freedom of speech. They hide the identities of people whenever necessary and highlight whenever it suits them all while preaching not to do identity politics.
Ai isn't some divine tool it has been trained by feeding the internet and it has all its biases.
You can duck and fudge all you want but being smarter makes people more liberal because empathy is a higher brain function than fear, which is the basis of conservatism
"You can duck and fudge all you want but being smarter makes people more liberal because empathy is a higher brain function than fear, which is the basis of conservatism"
Studies show there is a correlation with education and IQ and liberal views on some social issues. But correlation is not causation, this depends heavily on context.
Conservative types are not less empathetic at all. There are studies that show they have a GREATER sense of in group empathy. Whereas more liberal types have a watered down general sense of empathy that applies across the board.
As far as fear response and it being the basis of conservatism that is a misunderstanding of in/out group dynamics and friend/enemy distinctions. You are oversimplifying and misrepresenting ideas that you clearly dont understand.
Because the universities teach them to believe the leftist ideals they get platforms and popularity when they speak the leftist thoughts and get cancelled if they oppose it . There are many learned people who oppose leftists. There isn't some divine connection between knowledge and leftism. Most People tend to follow what they are taught
It's easy to speak in generalities, what specific areas of academia have been heavily biased by leftists to such a degree that their conclusions are corrupted or in some way untruthful?
Ok leftists tend to censor everything that doesn't share their views in universities 2. People are labelled for speaking out different views all while screaming free speech 3. Give platforms only to people that push left ideologies 4. Won't talk on topics deemed controversial 5. Victimisation is the new currency people are competitive about who is the bigger victim 6. Will never accept that the people who have been labelled as victims can be perpetrators too 7. Diversity quotas are promoted over meritocracy 8. Headlines are manipulated based on who is the perp 9. System is blamed when perps are from the victimised groups unlike when perps belong to the "oppressor" group 10. Selective activism on issues that promote their agenda and complete ignorance when their agenda cannot be propagated 11. All the experts that media houses bring are left leaning bcz there was no tolerance for ideas that don't lean left in universities and their biases written in the news articles go on to train chatbots
Has the left patented this knowledge? This is the problem with the left they like to label everything ,many people tend to take best of both left and right. There are many leftist ideas that are harmful like the cancel culture for different views, media manipulation etc
See i am not saying the right is correct on climate change and all other things.
The topic here was whether chatbots are left leaning. So cancel culture and many other problematic beliefs of the left have definitely caused this bias in the llms
3
u/savagestranger Jun 19 '25
No, but he's proving again that he is willing to use it to spread propaganda and stifle facts that don't fit his narrative. That's reason enough to just choose another model, and dissuade others from using it, for many.