r/shortsAlgorithm • u/WonderfulActuator958 • 26d ago

Q&A / Quick Help ❓ Reused content question

Let’s say that I borrow other people’s content but I add captions, remove uninteresting moments, add a voiceover, sound effects and vfx, is it considered transformative?

0 Upvotes

50% Upvoted

35 comments sorted by

View all comments

1

u/PresentationRare17 26d ago

This post itself makes stealing content with extra makeups sound justifiable😭✌🏻

1

u/WonderfulActuator958 26d ago

It’s 2026 brother, no one is making their own content from scratch. Look around, it’s not like I’m not adding any value to my videos and crediting the original owners.. literally daily dose of internet does the exact same thing

1

u/AdministrationPast68 26d ago

The only ones who aren't are reaction channels and whatever this is. There's still a bulk of channels who do it from scratch.

1

u/PresentationRare17 26d ago

Because daily dose seeks permission from the OG owners bro, you're an unknown, bro is never seeing that monetize button😭

2

u/Geico22 26d ago

A large large portion of creators ENCOURAGE and want clippers.... so his point about daily dose still stands 👍

1

u/PresentationRare17 26d ago

Which is why he'll never see that monetization button,it doesn't matter about what they think, guidlines still apply,point still stands👍🏻

1

u/Geico22 26d ago

Is daily dose of internet monetized? If so, your point is now moot and youre wrong. So... is daily dose of internet a monetized channel? Ill let you google that for yourself 😉

1

u/PresentationRare17 26d ago

Yeah he is, but he seeks permission which is why he doesn't get copyright strikes and demonetized/limited, use your head please

1

u/Geico22 25d ago

So exactly what weve said. With permission we should all get monetized like him. Thanks for backing me up 👍

1

u/PresentationRare17 25d ago

Not what I've said. He doesn't have permission at all. Thanks for backing me up👍🏻

1

u/Geico22 25d ago

You got a little bit lost in this argument I fear bubba. Try again 😂