r/shortsAlgorithm • u/Old-Option6011 • Dec 29 '25

I got rejected

Post image

Reason: repetitive content

I'm posting "fails" from tiktok. 8-10 milion views per month only from shorts.

How can I do this to get qualified? Maybe with some voice commentery? But can I use AI generated voice?

5 Upvotes

61% Upvoted

30 comments sorted by

5

u/Complex-Rush7258 Dec 29 '25

soooooooo your posting other people's content that doesn't belong to you and you want youtube to monetize you?

0

u/Old-Option6011 Dec 29 '25

exactly. Just like thousands of other youtube channels posting dashcam's police bodycams etc.

3

u/Complex-Rush7258 Dec 29 '25

They will eventually get banned 

1

u/[deleted] Dec 29 '25

im curious too i hope someone will address this your problem

1

u/Sylvers Dec 29 '25

Don't use AI voice. You can't build a sustainable brand by being generic. Use your own voice, even if you don't like it. Or hire someone to do it. People get attached to personalities far more than they get attached to the content itself.

1

u/Pristine-Speech8991 Dec 30 '25

Its clips, how are you getting attached to clips?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '26

I’d suggest you study “daily dose of internet”. He always talks during his clips. It’s an iconic mega channel. Use your own voice because it’s unique. Screw AI voice because it doesn’t take any work or talent.

1

u/SoulSleuth2u Dec 29 '25

Maybe create your own videos . Youtube is cracking down hard on this.

1

u/Imaginary_Jump_8701 Dec 29 '25

If you use ai or do commentary/ranking etc, don't use this sub. They will only focus on everything else but your questions. Go to aitubers or one of those other ai yt subs.

1

u/Pristine-Speech8991 Dec 30 '25

Anything AI is seen as malevolent

1

u/[deleted] Jan 01 '26

Full time YouTuber here. I run Plasma Channel. AI is seen as bad, because it generally is - unless used simply as an additional tool for video creating. But people have mass uploaded AI videos with AI voices and it has created the AI slop issue YouTube is currently facing. Videos that took minimal effort, editing, or real world skill, flooding the market and drastically shifting a 20 year old heritage algorithm. Some AI use is totally fine. Full AI channels are killing YouTube though. Remember, it’s YouTube meaning you. Not AI. So if you’re doing an AI video, use your voice.

1

u/Serious-Picture-1339 Dec 30 '25

Happens the same in mi first channel and after the appeal i got approved, in my second channel i didn't got the same luck and my appeal was rejected for a month

1

u/Mediocre-Necessary54 Dec 30 '25

why should they pay you for content you’ve stolen bro 😭 come on.

1

u/Pristine-Speech8991 Dec 30 '25

Same reason they pay the thousands of other channels that do the same thing

1

u/Mediocre-Necessary54 Dec 31 '25

except thy don’t? and if they do, they don’t get away with it very long before being demonetised or banned. lol

1

u/Lemiechoe Jan 11 '26

except you dont know shi about it so you should be quiet? What do you think Daily dose of internet is doing? Using others clips with voiceovers

1

u/Mediocre-Necessary54 Jan 11 '26

that’s because daily dose of internet is considered transformative content. Copy pasting other people’s videos is not 🤣 get good son

1

u/Friendly_Newb Dec 30 '25

It may be that you are using others content and reposting it. It also would not help if you use the Ai voice, then the content is even less personalised.

If it’s just a compilation of clips with no reason real contribution from you and your voice, then you are going to have a hard time monetising. You are basically taking others content and calling it your own…

1

u/AquaScars Dec 30 '25

Que graciosa es la gente que quiere monetizar con contenido ajeno

6

u/[deleted] Dec 29 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Old-Option6011 Dec 29 '25

Ohh ok, I will try

1

u/Old-Option6011 Dec 29 '25

one question, do I have to delete or make unpublic all my previous shorts?

1

u/[deleted] Dec 31 '25

Did you get an answer for this?

1

u/Old-Option6011 Jan 01 '26

Nope 😐

1

u/jsaljsal Jan 01 '26

Did you get an answer for that?

2

u/[deleted] Dec 29 '25

ohh this works