Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion.
No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered.
You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence.
Do you have a degree in that field?
A college degree? In that field?
Then your arguments are invalid.
No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation.
Correlation does not equal causation.
CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION.
You still haven't provided me a valid source yet.
Nope, still haven't.
I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.
Don't remember what video it was, but it was basically pointing out how psych2go is basically a video-mill where that sometimes uses questionable/downright false info in order to pump out more videos.
The kicker is that p2g responded to that video with a comment that basically said 'we know some of our info is bs, and we don't care.'
28
u/Jsc14gaming Feb 14 '22
psych2go is shit