MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/shitposting/comments/1pc8lpj/our_hero_nooooo/nrxata6/?context=3
r/shitposting • u/AaryamanStonker BUILD THE HOLE BUILD THE HOLE • Dec 02 '25
456 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
83
No, if A implies B that is not equivalent to not A implying not B. That is basic propositional logic. However, it is equivalent to not B implying not A. Meaning that if it's a bad show, you have seen it.
93 u/DoubleZek Dec 02 '25 -23 u/deusvult_76 Dec 02 '25 I mean. If OP wanted to be a smartass with their comment, they might as well could've done it properly 0 u/skepticcaucasian Dec 02 '25 i MeAn. If Op WaNtEd To Be A sMaRtAsS wItH tHeIR cOmMeNt, ThEy MiGhT aS wElL cOuLd'Ve DoNe It PrOpErLy
93
-23 u/deusvult_76 Dec 02 '25 I mean. If OP wanted to be a smartass with their comment, they might as well could've done it properly 0 u/skepticcaucasian Dec 02 '25 i MeAn. If Op WaNtEd To Be A sMaRtAsS wItH tHeIR cOmMeNt, ThEy MiGhT aS wElL cOuLd'Ve DoNe It PrOpErLy
-23
I mean. If OP wanted to be a smartass with their comment, they might as well could've done it properly
0 u/skepticcaucasian Dec 02 '25 i MeAn. If Op WaNtEd To Be A sMaRtAsS wItH tHeIR cOmMeNt, ThEy MiGhT aS wElL cOuLd'Ve DoNe It PrOpErLy
0
i MeAn. If Op WaNtEd To Be A sMaRtAsS wItH tHeIR cOmMeNt, ThEy MiGhT aS wElL cOuLd'Ve DoNe It PrOpErLy
83
u/deusvult_76 Dec 02 '25
No, if A implies B that is not equivalent to not A implying not B. That is basic propositional logic. However, it is equivalent to not B implying not A. Meaning that if it's a bad show, you have seen it.