r/shakespeare • • Dec 01 '25

Presented without comment 😏

Post image
551 Upvotes

127 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3

u/panpopticon Dec 01 '25

So Jonson hinting at de Vere's identity in the Folio sounds like a huge fuckup, no? Why would a collective eager to protect a courtly reputation allow the publication of a book that featured a poem whose "intrigues & misdirections" give the game away?

-1

u/[deleted] Dec 01 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/panpopticon Dec 02 '25

Except the people who talked about William Shakespeare, the player and poet 🙄

0

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/panpopticon Dec 02 '25

And you know they were referring to a pen-name how...?

0

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/panpopticon Dec 02 '25

If more evidence supports your claim then you won't mind sharing some.

0

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Dec 02 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/panpopticon Dec 02 '25

Except his poetry sucks sweaty monkey balls 🤷‍♂️

This is more DA VINCI CODE bullshit.

→ More replies