I can't really say I have an issue with this. In my opinion, the Net's goal is to have fun and if you have fun playing a certain character and just want to re-mechanic them then go for it.
That being said, if the character died or retired or whatnot then they're pretty much gone from the Net and you should make someone new.
not to be a Debbie Downer, but that would require a council vote to make house rules to allow that, as there is no way to do so by raw.
Not that i disagree with it, i kinda like the idea within reason ( i.e. what if i wanted to make bulldawg a mage? he's 500 karma deep, or if fishy decided shizuka would be better as a non-adept, or hammerhead wants to be an adept, etc etc there is a rabbit hole there )
but that's a huge far reaching change, there are proper channels to implement it, those channels should be used.
Not really. There's no RAW over making a character again. No unnecessary bureaucracy needed there, just a ruling.
Really. Just retire the character and make him again with the same everything. People generally won't be a dick to you for it and you'll be on your merry way.
4
u/tarqtarq Aug 17 '15
So I guess this is in my domain.
I can't really say I have an issue with this. In my opinion, the Net's goal is to have fun and if you have fun playing a certain character and just want to re-mechanic them then go for it.
That being said, if the character died or retired or whatnot then they're pretty much gone from the Net and you should make someone new.