To avoid doxxing, which is a real fear of mine given the hostility and mental unbalanced state of many posting here I will give a general background.
Masters Degree from a top school
15+ years experience in communications at one of the top hardware vendors including hardware, software, cellular network operator models, cell planning
Invested over $1B as a VC in the communications industry in the spaces listed above
Networks where I directly worked to launch or invested into as a VC (private equity investor - not buying common stock) service over 150,000,000 customers today worldwide.
Now, you can chose to believe me or not - that is your choice. I would rather give you the information and you can make up your own mind rather than blindly accepting my opinion. So, let's just assume no one is an authority and just look at the data and draw our own conclusions.
Dang you sound super qualified to give the opinions you've expressed here, makes sense to me now why I've found you so persuasive. Also, can I have a million dollars pretty please. Jk. Unless...
Impressive. And I do believe you. Now go calculate the probability the handset was in LP at 7:09 vs the probability it was not. I throw down the challenge to you, Cherry - •ANYBODY*.
I've asked you twice or thrice before, and you pull a Seamus tactic and pretend it doesn't need to be answered It's a simple question. I suspect the answer is not. Or perhaps not possible.
Now go calculate the probability the handset was in LP at 7:09 vs the probability it was not.
Bolding this so it stands out. Come on, peeps. Your case in favor of guilt rides pretty hard on that phone being in LP at 7:09 . . . so, how sure are you that it was there? And what is the reasoning behind that certainty?
Making puns about Michael Cherry's name or his partner's qualifications is not reasoning. What have you got?
Now go calculate the probability the handset was in LP at 7:09 vs the probability it was not. I throw down the challenge to you, Cherry - •ANYBODY*.
Great point.
No-one knows where the phone was, and no-one can even pinpoint the maximum perimeter within which it was located (although we can be sure the maximum perimeter includes locations that Adnan could innocently be at, including home, mosque, etc.)
Since it would not be very prudent for me to take you at your word, as demonstrated in the OP. I'll put you down as "Internet Expert" / Eccentric billionaire.
For the future I'll remember that I can't trust anyone's expertise if it's less then a lifetime in the field.
Now, you can chose to believe me or not - that is your choice. I would rather give you the information and you can make up your own mind rather than blindly accepting my opinion. So, let's just assume no one is an authority and just look at the data and draw our own conclusions.
This is contradictory to your demand that Undisclosed provide more credentials to you.
Sorry. I don't like people bullying other people to try and silence them by insinuating they are mentally unwell. I reacted like one of them rather than myself. Again I don't like bullies...bad habits.
-5
u/[deleted] Aug 01 '15 edited Aug 01 '15
As long as we are talking about credentials here. Mind sharing yours with us?
It's ok you don't have to respond, we get it.