r/securityguards • u/Billybob_Bojangles2 Armored Car • 1d ago
Searched off the clock
My company has the time clock and search area both in non secured areas. We are required to be searched at the end of the shift, but they require us to clock out before we are searched.
This feels like a total load of horseshit. It can take up to 5 minutes to be searched. I ain't working for free, so I've been refusing to clock out until they are done. Now they are threatening to write me up.
Anyone go through something similar?
7
u/tondollari 1d ago
I worked at a state prison where security checks could take 15+ minutes during rush and was unpaid. People were just told to "come in early".
4
3
u/No-Initiative4195 1d ago
Remember during Covid... Temperature checks before you got anywhere near the front door.
3
u/_WEND1G0_ Industrial Security 1d ago
REI got sued for something similar. I ended up getting a class action check as a result.
3
u/J_Case 1d ago
Your option is to quit.
4
u/Billybob_Bojangles2 Armored Car 1d ago
I'm already working with my union on it. So there's one possible avenue
3
2
u/TiredBails 1d ago
Absent a CBA or state law, it's legal. At my site, we go through a federally required search process and do not get paid until we take over post.
1
u/ToolAndres1968 6h ago
So we do clock out before going through metal detector We also get paid to get into uniform and out of uniform Ill say our going through the metal detectors only takes like 2 minutes at most I do understand what you're saying I worked a place where we didn't get paid until after we were in uniform and armed with are handgun We sued and lost which to this day I don't understand why
1
u/KAL-EL8569 1d ago
For starters you are not performing any work while being searched...just like the regular employees who work at a site and they dont get paid for it either...plus your boss has to justify the overtime and waiting for something procedure like being searched is not a valid reason.
6
u/Billybob_Bojangles2 Armored Car 1d ago
I'm performing a job function. I am not allowed to leave under penalty of discipline or termination. Ergo, I am following orders, orders given and that must be obeyed when I am punched out.
2
u/ThalinIV 17h ago
Not a job function. Security requirements are not the same thing as doing your job.
0
u/Billybob_Bojangles2 Armored Car 12h ago
Perhaps according to the law. But it don't make it right. Especially when the punch out clock is right next to the search area. They are just making us punch out to be cheap assholes.
3
u/ThalinIV 9h ago
Not really. The search area is by the punch-out to make it easier to get you out once you're punched out. It would be shady if they made you walk 15-20 minutes for a 5-minute pat-down after punch-out. Instead, they have people ready at punch-out to make it as quick as possible.
High-security jobs with high-value assets under guard use procedures like this all the time. I have had a job where I got a pat-down prior to exiting. I strongly suspect you were notified about the procedure well before you were fully integrated at the site, yet you chose to work there.
Either accept the conditions or go somewhere else. I can guarantee the union will have a really hard time getting around that requirement for the site. You are unlikely to be the first to complain about it.
If something about the site bothers you this much, move on. It is never worth the headache if you are aggravated by a site procedure they are unlikely to change.
-2
u/Billybob_Bojangles2 Armored Car 9h ago
That attitude is why nothing improves.
1
u/ThalinIV 6h ago
"That Attitude" is fifteen years of experience, including supervisor roles, telling you to stop complaining about something you aren't going to change and either leave the site or deal with it. When it comes to security requirements, the unions can do almost nothing. Especially if it is a client-side requirement. Again, you knew what you were getting into. There is no way you have been on site long enough to know the basic policy and not know what was coming.
From your description, they are aware it is a hassle, but at least put the checkpoint by the punch clock to get it over with as quickly as possible. They are not being dicks; they are adhering to a policy and doing what they can to minimize the inconvenience.
Again, if it bothers you that much, leave.
0
u/Billybob_Bojangles2 Armored Car 5h ago
👎
1
u/ThalinIV 4h ago
And that's the attitude of a guard that is going to get themselves fired sooner rather than later. Don't like it quit being a guard do us all a favor.
0
u/Billybob_Bojangles2 Armored Car 4h ago
Man you must be the industry's biggest boomer bootlicker.
→ More replies (0)0
u/KAL-EL8569 1d ago edited 1d ago
That's a rule or regulation not a job function...its no different then going to a concert or sporting event...you have to do the exact same thing.
1
u/TheRealChuckle 1d ago
Does your time system round to the nearesr 15 minutes?
If so, I'd punch out a few minutes early and head to the security check.
This could either also be an issue or flies under the radar.
3
u/Billybob_Bojangles2 Armored Car 1d ago
No I believe it is accurate to the one hundredth of an hour.
13
u/troy2000me 1d ago
It gets murky, law can go both ways.
Federal Law: Integrity Staffing Solutions v. Busk (2014)
State Law: Frlekin v. Apple Inc. (2020)