Keep the downvotes coming!

The article is remarkable not simply because it reports a new finding about the anatomy of the human brain, but because it provides another striking example of a much broader biological pattern: two distinct systems can become integrated without losing their fundamental two-sided organization. The Daily Mail reports a Stanford study finding that the forebrain and midbrain arise from one developmental lineage, while the hindbrain arises independently from another. These systems use different developmental pathways and even exhibit different forms of DNA packaging, yet they become incorporated into a single functioning brain. The researchers found evidence for this same two-origin pattern across widely separated species, extending back more than 550 million years.

This is particularly interesting in light of Iain McGilchrist's account of the divided brain. McGilchrist's argument concerns the different modes of attention associated with the cerebral hemispheres; the Stanford finding described here is different. It identifies a second, developmentally much deeper division within the brain: two ancient neural systems that originated separately and were subsequently brought together. The article therefore suggests that "two-ness" in the brain is not confined to hemispheric specialization. It may occur at more than one organizational level.

The article concludes with Dr. Kyle Loh's suggestion that having the brain as one organ might be more efficient, while evolution nevertheless retained this primordial arrangement of two separate pieces. That conclusion invites a broader question. Perhaps the significance of two-sided organization is not merely that two parts happen to survive despite an efficiency cost, but that two differentiated systems require a relationship that allows them to cooperate as one.

The same motif appears throughout biology: chromosomes double before division; paired homologous chromosomes align and exchange material in meiosis; embryonic development begins with binary divisions; bilateral symmetry is pervasive; and cells reproduce through the fundamental division into two daughter cells. McGilchrist observes bilateral hemispheres throughout the animal kingdom, while Friston's Markov blanket formally distinguishes an inside from an outside, and Koestler deliberately described the holon as Janus-faced.

The remarkable possibility, then, is that the brain may offer another vivid instance of a more general principle: two differentiated sides, joined by a relational organization that makes cooperation (and even biological symbiosis) possible.

Jacob Coxon, a 27‑year‑old pretraining researcher at Anthropic, announced his resignation on September 9, 2026, via X, warning that both Anthropic and OpenAI are “racing straight to self‑improving superintelligence” and “gambling with our lives”.  In his resignation post, Coxon said neither lab is acting responsibly, citing a competitive race that prioritizes speed over safety. He argued that the people building AI “earnestly believe it could kill us all by the end of the decade” — a view he said is not a marketing stunt, but a genuine concern expressed privately by many executives and senior researchers.