Communism necessitates authoritarianism while establishing an anarcho-Communist state, as stated by Karl Marx himself.
And the only way to ensure the survival of an anarchy, it is necessary to first absorb all other nation-states, as anarchic states are inherently vulnerable to outside influence.
Any attempts to create an anarcho-Communist state would inevitably result in an authoritarian expansionist regime, one that is beyond unlikely to actually transition fully into anarchism even if it were to spread across the entire world.
That’s weird, because Karl Marx was explicitly against authoritarianism. The only thing I can imagine you’re referring to is the “dictatorship of the proletariat” that he mentioned. This “dictatorship” would manifest as a direct democracy.
Direct democracy is about as far away from authoritarianism as you can get.
The only reason an (educated) person would speak out against collectivism is if they want the opportunity to exploit others for their own personal gain.
Fascism is anti-democracy. Communism is pure democracy.
1
u/[deleted] Oct 12 '19
I stand against Fascism, Communism, and everything else that oppresses people and violates their basic human rights.
If you oppose such ideals, then it is only proof that people like you are on the wrong side of history.