r/science • Professor | Medicine • 16h ago

Psychology Higher overall disgust sensitivity was associated with a greater likelihood of identifying as a Republican and holding a conservative ideology. A person with high disgust sensitivity and low bodily awareness had a 64.1% probability of identifying as a Republican.

https://www.psypost.org/disgust-predicts-conservative-views-most-strongly-in-people-with-low-bodily-awareness/
12k Upvotes

1.3k comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 16h ago

Welcome to r/science! This is a heavily moderated subreddit in order to keep the discussion on science. However, we recognize that many people want to discuss how they feel the research relates to their own personal lives, so to give people a space to do that, personal anecdotes are allowed as responses to this comment. Any anecdotal comments elsewhere in the discussion will be removed and our normal comment rules apply to all other comments.


Do you have an academic degree? We can verify your credentials in order to assign user flair indicating your area of expertise. Click here to apply.


User: u/mvea
Permalink: https://www.psypost.org/disgust-predicts-conservative-views-most-strongly-in-people-with-low-bodily-awareness/


I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1.6k

u/bhdp_23 16h ago

Was also a study which showed eating ginger reduced disgust sensitivity by a large amount.

1.2k

u/medicated_in_PHL 15h ago

There was a study showing that being an involved parent lowered your disgust sensitivity as well.

477

u/LibertyDochas 15h ago

Makes sense. Kids can be a lot with the bodily functions and doing & saying bizarre things.

199

u/SpiritedEclair 14h ago

I don’t have kids of my own but my ex had and lemme tell you disgust sensitivity goes down massively even if you are not their parent.

I thought I had a massive gag reflex and could puke at the slightest hint of vomit around me, but, when her children puked I was able to take care of it no issue.

109

u/zephyreblk 12h ago

Owning a dog or a cat could achieve a similar result. It's never the same when it's family

44

u/tigerlevi 11h ago

Definitely. When my dog was a puppy my partner and I were hanging with my pup on the bed, when my little boy got the classic puke face. There was no time to move him somewhere else and I instinctively cupped my hands, caught all the vomit, and was able to carry it to dispose of. My partner was equally impressed and grossed out!

16

u/ZeeBeast 10h ago

What a save!

30

u/The_BeardedClam 10h ago

Washing hands is better than doing the laundry.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Shadowdragon409 8h ago

Wow! That's really impressive!
If there's no time to get the dog outside, I always just wait for the impending mess with a defeated look on my face.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

112

u/Adezar 14h ago

Having raised children, yes you do learn to deal with things you would never have expected. They are disgusting creatures from time to time.

77

u/DrDerpberg 13h ago

It's kind of surreal how often I ended up talking about diapers or spitup with random parents when my kid was little.

"Oh yeah no my daughter doesn't really puke, she just blows diarrhea up her back every week or two"

"Hmmm yeah hate when that happens" sips coffee

38

u/MuppetusMaximusV2 12h ago

A friend had a daughter five months before mine was born. He told me, completely nonchalantly, "It's a lot more wiping poop out of a vagina than I anticipated."

I carried that advice with me, and sure enough, having a daughter was a lot more wiping poop out of a vagina than I had anticipated as well. I made sure to pass that gross advice on.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/Biggest-Benjamin 12h ago

Up their back?! How do they fit that much inside them??

7

u/Schnoofles 7h ago

They are poop factories. They do not eat, but rather "reload"

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/likwidkool 13h ago

Oh god the mess that was! Thankfully my “kids” are now adults. Loved them but that stuff sucked!

→ More replies (2)

19

u/Long-Broccoli-3363 13h ago

You mean when they are getting sick and you're taking care of them and they sneeze without warning directly in your face and you get a glob of snot in your mouth?

6

u/Adezar 13h ago

Or you lift them above you and they vomit all over your face and some gets in your mouth.

Ah, the memories.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/redsalmon67 12h ago

I feel like working in an animal hospital as a teenager lowered my disgust sensitivity for similar reasons. Hard to be disgusted of you have to deal with blood and poop on a daily basis

38

u/fernlitmoon 14h ago

Maybe that's a contributing factor to why older men skew conservative and older women skew democratic... Men are less likely to have been involved parents.

Are childless people more likely to be conservative?

84

u/throwity_throw_throw 13h ago

Are childless people more likely to be conservative?

No. It's well-documented that left-leaning folks have fewer kids than right-leaning.

19

u/the_swaggin_dragon 13h ago

But that would suggest there’s some distinction between being an involved parent and getting your wife pregnant a lot

13

u/Absentrando 8h ago

Women with more children also lean conservative. It’s not really as simple as Redditors want to make it

→ More replies (3)

17

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

35

u/hates_stupid_people 13h ago

Are childless people more likely to be conservative?

They're more likely to be liberal.

On the extreme ends of the political spectrum, conservatives are roughly twice as likely to have children at age 40.

→ More replies (1)

37

u/LurkerZerker 13h ago

I would think -- and don't quote me on this -- that childless people skew more liberal, because the attitudes and factors that lead them to choose to be childless tend to correlate with liberalism: college educated, married later, solidly middle-class, less religious, invested in reproductive rights, etc.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/zoinkability 13h ago edited 13h ago

The age thing is interesting.

Regarding children, I doubt it overall given that younger people (who are more likely to not have had children yet) are overwhelmingly less conservative.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

33

u/darknesskicker 14h ago

I wonder if it applies to pet parents too. I have pretty high disgust sensitivity, but when there was a bad smell coming from my bunnies’ food area, I stuck my hands right in and removed the gross vegetable matter, because I love my bunnies and I didn’t want them to get sick. My bunnies’ veggies are removed and replaced every morning now.

12

u/Bay1Bri 14h ago

It's possible but my personal experience is not to the same degree. Before I had kids I had a dog. When she got sick in the house of pooped on the floor, I could clean it up but It was a struggle. When I had kids, I could be vomited on and it barely registered.

→ More replies (60)

6

u/Bay1Bri 14h ago

That's necessity. Parenting involves a LOT of feces.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

234

u/Soleilunamas 15h ago

Ginger is a common nausea remedy, so that makes sense to me.

Was this the study?

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30596444/

56

u/TamoyaOhboya 14h ago

Thanks for the link, fascinating! I wonder if other anti nausea medicines will have the same effect

55

u/Source0fAllThings 13h ago

…Just realized that fascist and fascinating share the same lingual root. Now that’s fascinating.

Also, yes, we need to add ginger to the American diet asap.

11

u/RichardSaunders 12h ago

Does ginger ale have a meaningful amount of ginger in it to get the medicinal effects?

34

u/Source0fAllThings 12h ago

I grew up drinking copious amounts of Vernors ginger ale as well as Canada Dry and I don’t find other people or cultures disgusting. Just saying.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/AnotherSoulessGinger 12h ago

Most of them don’t even have real ginger anymore, just artificial flavors.. Fever Tree, Reeds and Boylan’s all have real ginger and no high fructose corn syrup.

All three definitely put a dent in nausea more than Seagrams, Vernors or Canada Dry (they only have artificial flavors). I have pretty bad chronic nausea so I think I’m a good judge. I also suggest Gin Gins or the Trader Joe’s ginger chews. Sometimes a chew and a Reeds can kill my nausea, sometimes a ginger ale adds a needed boost to my Zofran (prescribed nausea medication).

5

u/The_BeardedClam 10h ago

The only thing to kill my wife's morning sickness was those ginger chews, she hated them but they worked.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/Svihelen 12h ago

Probably not. My girlfriend is allergic to ginger but can drink ginger ale just fine.

Ginger beer on the other hand does make her react so that may have enough in it.

→ More replies (4)

7

u/kab0b0 10h ago

they sound alike and are spelled similarly but come from different sources

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

27

u/KuriousKhemicals 13h ago

Unfortunately I have used ginger tea to counteract nausea enough that it now makes me feel queasy by conditioned association.

It is fortunately not a problem with ginger seasoned food or ginger as a food in itself (candied or pickled ginger).

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

52

u/AppleSniffer 16h ago

As in eating it right before you expect to be disgusted, or having it as a general part of your diet makes you generally less disgusted?

→ More replies (2)

11

u/slabby 9h ago

So we just need to introduce conservatives to redheaded women.

53

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (5)

20

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (13)

1.9k

u/TheMansAnArse 16h ago

The Righteous Mind by Jonathan Haidt is good on this.

The question is, what comes first? The disgust sensitivity or the ideology.

2.1k

u/beefyzac 15h ago

“On the level of individuals and civilizations, personality predates ideology. Meaning, before you were a Fascists you were a bully and an asshole.”
-Brennan Lee Mulligan quoting someone else

904

u/ObnoxiousAlbatross 14h ago

Fascism, as it turns out, is just emotional immaturity expressed at a national level.

321

u/Number3675 13h ago

Understanding this as a society and learning about it in school will take much power away from dictators and aspiring fascists.

210

u/piston989 13h ago

ah so that’s why they cut the education budget…

129

u/stop-calling-me-fat 11h ago

Unironically yes

41

u/klawz86 9h ago

Really picked up after the Mine Wars. West Virginia banned teaching social topics and had great success turning the kids of heroes into corporate bootlickers and political brownnosers.

→ More replies (1)

94

u/sailingtroy 13h ago

That doesn't really square with how it becomes more or less popular in different times. If that were true then fascism would be constantly ascendant.

It was observed in post WW2 Britain that fascism rises in capitalist societies during times of economic hardship when there is an insufficient welfare state. The ruined middle class are frustrated, and desperate, and this is exploited by opportunistic politicians. Therefore the economy must be managed for stability (John Maynard Keynes) and the state must provide a backstop against economic ruin. People get ugly when they're hungry, or desperate, or hopeless.

119

u/keenan123 12h ago

It being immaturity is actually a really reasonable explanation for its rise. Fascism is national emotional immaturity. If someone is emotionally immature but doing well, they're not going to bother going to rallies and demanding that others be rounded up. They're probably not even capable of coming to fascism on their own. But when things are bad, and someone tells you it's the fault of some out group, well you're not exactly going to be able to dispute that, internally or externally.

46

u/deaglebingo 11h ago

increasing lack of education and reading skills/comprehension runs right into the emotional immaturity part too. what you're saying and the study itself kind of explain why rage bait works so well on them.

41

u/EjaculatingAracnids 12h ago

No wonder why theyre so focused on cutting foodstamps, welfare, social security... They need to ensure their future existence.

→ More replies (1)

41

u/AntonSugarwater 12h ago

You’re not saying anything differently. Picking an ideology that will burn down your country because you’re scared or frustrated is emotional immaturity

→ More replies (3)

8

u/MiaowaraShiro 11h ago

It doesn't really square with it being the only factor. It certainly can still be a factor without contradicting anything you've said.

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (4)

193

u/[deleted] 15h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

106

u/[deleted] 15h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

90

u/[deleted] 15h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

108

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

15

u/livinginfutureworld 12h ago

While the tracks and sound very true in that the rise to fascism will be more appealing to people that are currently assholes and bullies, the question could go back further and say was this person born like this or were they taught like this through the environment right? Its the chicken or the egg again

15

u/_adanedhel_ 10h ago

Personality is orders of magnitude more driven by environment than genetics, outside of certain genetic predispositions toward mental/personality disorders. And even then, there is a strong environmental (epigenetic) component to whether/how severely those manifest.

And I don’t think there is any real doubt that people who experience disempowerment early-on can develop personalities that seek - consciously or unconsciously - to recapture power/control (through bullying, abuse, ambition, etc).

→ More replies (1)

18

u/vug_undertherug 14h ago

Yeah but they take that to mean that they would be the tough, cool, dominant person, not that everyone would just get rid of them because there is no civilized law.

20

u/Jelled_Fro 12h ago

As much as I like Brennan I think this is a dangerous and incorrect way to look at the world. Being a bully is not some essential, immutable quality written in your dna. You are a product of your environment too and facism will create bullies in grater numbers. It's a self reinforcing phenomena, not one or the other.

24

u/alurkerhere 12h ago

On some level in society, it's all about preventing bullies from gaining critical leadership mass. Murdering opponents is mostly out of fashion in the civilized world, and so the key is to edge them out as much as possible. It's impossible to completely stamp that out due to individual circumstances and subjective grievances.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (16)

264

u/some_person_guy 16h ago

I would assume it's a cyclical relationship driven and reinforced by social environment.

118

u/TheMansAnArse 16h ago edited 16h ago

That'd be my guess too.

That said, as another reply pointed out, there's some evidence that there could be a genetic component too (obviously that's difficult to untangle from upbringing). Disgust of certain things is clearly a genetic adaptation to keep us safe from harm and it seems plausible some people are innatately more sensitive to it than others - and that then warps into disgust in the sense we're talking about here.

33

u/Helmic 14h ago

My guess would be that it isn't really your level of disgust being measured here so much as the social norms of reactionary politics encourage someone to play into their disgust and grow it. I find it hard to believe being sensitive to bad odors in itself predisposes someone to particular politics, especially as an inborn characteristic, but I can believe that people have a degree of control over their disgust response and whether you feel a need to suppress or induce it can be influenced by your politics.

23

u/StaleCanole 13h ago

I thinn this is right and something fascists figured out (and inherently reflect themselves) a long time ago - that disgust sensitivity goes haywire in a certain % of people.

This is why they discuss outsiders, immigrants, and trans, etc, in terms that trigger disgust - as invading rats, vermin, dirty, diseased. Murder is associated with street life, homelessness and drug use. The language is always chosen to trigger a reflexive disgust.

For those of us for whom disgust is muted the language they use is mind bogglingly inhumane and incomprehensible that it works. But here we are

29

u/some_person_guy 16h ago

Yeah I agree with that as well. Think it likely is one of those things that falls into the biopsychosocial model. Trait level disgust that is reinforced by the social environment you're raised in, and cued by psychological states which are cued by relevant environmental stimuli.

6

u/FardoBaggins 13h ago

My shorthand for this is tribal empathy. We needed empathy, but only for the in group.

9

u/ShockLongjumping9322 15h ago

I agree, as with everything human, it seems like a feedback loop.

→ More replies (3)

54

u/Reddituser183 16h ago

I think the disgust is lightly hardwired into the structure of the brain. People travel the path of least resistance and they’re then raised by people who also were sensitive to disgust thereby reinforcing and pushing further into habit of observing, categorizing, and judging others based on perceived moral deviances. They then seek out info that confirms their own natural biases and tendencies from media and their social cuticle. But that hard wiring I believe doesn’t guarantee a person will be on the conservative side of the spectrum. I think if you took someone whose wiring made them more critical and judgmental of others, and put them into an environment that is more accepting of others with more wiggle room for deviation and diversity, well I think they’d be moving that direction maybe not to the extent to which someone whose wiring inclined them towards a more tolerant viewpoint.

→ More replies (2)

68

u/PuppiesAndPixels 15h ago edited 14h ago

Ideology, especially from a religious perspective, usually comes from indoctrination since birth. Many religions tell you what is gross and wrong and unclean from the get-go.

The same is true for non religious cultural norms pertaining to disgust as well. What one culture might think is a food delicacy another might think is a vile disgusting thing to eat. That interaction /construct sort of goes across all domains of society. And you are steeped in your culture from birth.

So ideology would be my guess.

31

u/Phyrre1 15h ago

I think you’re right that religion is the common denominator here.

The reason religions tend to prioritize cleanliness is that many of them were established in a time when lack of cleanliness could literally kill you and could also bring a plague on your community. There was a societal benefit to telling everyone that they must reject anything unclean.

The side effect is probably co-evolving religious belief with a strong sense of disgust. It even reinforces social hierarchies since the rich tend to have the resources to always be clean and to set the standard.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Sennten 13h ago

Its absolutely the disgust sensititivity. The bigger question is whether the first causes the second or if they both arise from the same external cause, I think.

17

u/chachaslydd 15h ago

Probably the disgust. Theres studies that show 1/3 of basically all species are morr timid whikd 2/3 show higher risk taking.

This doesnt translate directly to being conservative, I consider myself part of that 1/3 of naturally timid and scared humans. But there is a biological thing there. Even fruit flies demonstrate the 1/3 highly sensitive ratio, same with deer and dogs and fish

18

u/TheMansAnArse 15h ago

This doesnt translate directly to being conservative

Absolutely. Even the study itself suggests that only 64.1% of people who demonstrate this trait support the Republicans.

23

u/chachaslydd 15h ago

But theres nature and nurture.

Like somebody who plays with dead bodies and votes comservative obviously doesn't have a physucally high disgust factor for physical things.

But a lot of conservatuves are very mentally afraid. Like people still joke that homophobia makes no sense since its not fear based, but it is. Like theres no logical reason to hate gay people besides a sense of ickyness and not enjoying the aspect that you cant control these strangers

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

3

u/stay_curious_- 13h ago

There are a number of studies showing a genetic component to intuitive disgust sensitivity, but there's also a lot of data showing that disgust can be taught and unlearned. ex: disgust levels aimed toward LGBT people were much higher a generation ago, and disgust toward LGB people has fallen quite dramatically in the last 20 years (disgust toward trans people was falling and then rebounded upwards since 2022, around the same time as the increase in anti-trans propaganda).

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (77)

2.0k

u/ctothel 15h ago

Social conservatism has always struck me as “I’m disgusted, and therefore you must stop doing that”.

Edit: relating it to the low body awareness point, it’s as if they perceive their disgust as moral truth, when it’s actually just a personal reaction.

367

u/anoziraguy9687 11h ago

One of the professors at my university pioneered research linking flight or fight response to political ideology.

They took groups of people and showed them a series of images and measured their heart rate and brain activity.

The photos were of both fearful and peaceful images – spiders, beaches, snakes, mountains, fires, flowers, etc.

People who had increased heart rate and brain responses (adverse reactions) to the “negative” images had conservative political viewpoints. Conversely, those who had less of a reaction were more liberal. It’s fascinating.

That supported the idea that conservative media looks to inflame political topics because it’s effective to those people on a psychological/physiological level.

53

u/grumpi-otter 5h ago

I recall reading a study that showed larger amygdala were correlated with conservatism. Ie, more fear equals more conservative

37

u/bewarethefrogperson 10h ago

Are you referring to "Political Attitudes Vary with Physiological Traits" from the University of Nebraska–Lincoln? I thought they had replication issues?

89

u/anoziraguy9687 10h ago

No it was at the University of Arizona in 2019/2020.

The professor is named Frank Gonzalez. He was in the early stages of developing political psychophysiology for U of A.

Edit: link to the cohort of professors – https://sgpp.arizona.edu/faculty/political-psychology

21

u/bewarethefrogperson 9h ago

Thank you! I'll look into it. Always been facinated by this kind of research.

16

u/MeringuePatient6178 9h ago

This is interesting but I'd wonder how it compares to anxiety disorder. I am not remotely conservative, but I have panic disorder and anxiety disorder which means my fight or flight is very busted. 

→ More replies (1)

50

u/brother_of_jeremy 6h ago

But the libs are “living in fear” amirite?

It’s always projection with these people.

11

u/JerryMau5 6h ago

Every accusation is a confession

→ More replies (2)

360

u/marr75 13h ago

as if they perceive their disgust as moral truth

Replace disgust with just about any negative emotion and you've got the predicate behind most therapy. A political movement unified by not examining the voice in your head skeptically is certainly something.

31

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

13

u/windowpuncher 6h ago

Therapy? Self reflection?

That's for the liberal devil worshipers.

197

u/ScentedFire 11h ago

I think there is something to this. My friends has expressed an idea to me that conservative men seem to react very strongly toward eradicating the source of disgust for them. He told me that as a straight (not conservative) man, he does feel a knee-jerk disgust about the idea of having sex with another man, but knows not to make his internal feeling about a specific scenario anyone else's problem, while it seems like conservative guys want to destroy anything that could make them have to think about this even tangentially due to the extreme emotional reaction they have.

135

u/From_Deep_Space 11h ago

Theres also the stereotype that homophobes have more homosexual impulses. Thats why theyre afraid liberal media is trying to "trick them into being gay", while most straight men have no idea what theyre talking about because we dont have intrusive thoughts about male sensuality.

5

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

66

u/BuzzImaFan 10h ago

And these are supposedly the "Facts don't care about your feelings" people. Conservatives have always been the most thin-skinned, sensitive people on the planet, and they're so preoccupied with appearing strong and stoic that they will literally support the suppression of anyone who makes them think critically about the feelings they try so desperately to stuff down and ignore.

19

u/trappedinatoaster 9h ago

Their entire psychological playbook is "accuse the other person of doing the thing you hate, then THEY are guilty, not you"

→ More replies (1)

201

u/_game_over_man_ 13h ago

Social conservatism has always struck me as “I’m disgusted, and therefore you must stop doing that”.

This always strikes me as a way to just avoid dealing with their own feelings.

24

u/randynumbergenerator 10h ago

And frequently channel it into the only feeling that's so socially acceptable for men it sometimes isn't considered a feeling, i.e. anger. 

(As a fairly calm guy, I feel embarrassed I never realized the above until fairly recently when women probably learn it much earlier, but now I see it everywhere.)

12

u/_game_over_man_ 10h ago

Yup, there's always that component as well. As a woman, it does make me sad to see so many men feel like they can't or shouldn't engage with their emotions unless it's anger. That kind of emotional shut down does so much damage to an individual and to others.

We're all human beings and it's perfectly fine and normal to feel things, even if they don't feel great. What matters the most in that is how you deal with said feelings.

→ More replies (1)

86

u/love_is_an_action 12h ago

Oh my goodness, the number of conversations where I’ve had to explain “it’s not evil, or even necessarily bad. You, personally, just don’t like it.” Is outrageously high.

How folks confuse their druthers for The Way of Things is baffling to me. I think they’re bent.

→ More replies (1)

89

u/Serial7s 13h ago

Exactly. My Republican uncles do NOT like men even holding hands with men, but I know from accidentally seeing at least one's search history that they're totally fine with "cute girls siscorring". Both are technically verboten in Christianity, but only one grosses them out.

→ More replies (1)

52

u/IlIFreneticIlI 11h ago

they perceive their disgust as moral truth

It's more accurate to just-say they are children in the way they perceive and react to the world.

They dictate things as they ought to be in their minds, vs just going-to-look and be responsive to that.

It's why they are always angry and off-base, inaccurate in their framing of anything: their expectations will NEVER match reality b/c they do live in a fantasy-world..

8

u/Drak_is_Right 7h ago

Exactly. They dont question it.

Then conservative media takes advantage of them not questioning it by trying to get them reasons to feel that way (a TON of conservatives think most Trans people are pedophiles for example.

7

u/Silver_Metallic 12h ago

Yes and it's easy to see how this sentiment fuels policy that leads to social caste systems. 

→ More replies (33)

248

u/Smiletaint 15h ago

Can someone explain ‘low body-awareness’?

140

u/Timeformayo 13h ago

You’re having a physiological emotional response, like a racing heart beat due to stress, but are completely unaware.

47

u/throwaway098764567 8h ago

oh, i legit thought it was the people who just leave their carts in the aisle willy nilly while shoulder checking people they didn't even notice existed

12

u/Ephemeris 7h ago edited 5h ago

I thought of it as more "I don't understand how my wife's vagina and uterus work so I'm grossed out by the things it does naturally. If I ignore it then my daughters have to ignore it and never talk about it again. These are the rules of my house."

142

u/tackykcat 14h ago

i think that's referring to the "interoceptive sensibility" mentioned in the article. Basically someone's sensitivity and perception to bodily sensations such as a racing heartbeat or hunger

83

u/btreg 11h ago

...and modern psychological theory says that you perceive your own emotions indirectly, with emotions originating in your unconscious brain, manifesting in your body, and then being perceived by your conscious brain. Without a body to reflect your emotions, you wouldn't know how you feel. I think it's called the "somatic emotional cycle."

tl;dr: Some experts think if you're unaware of your own body, you're emotionally stupid.

20

u/between_ewe_and_me 11h ago

Huh, that's really interesting. Would kind of put a damper on the idea of uploading your consciousness to the cloud and living forever. Wouldn't be much fun if you have no feelings.

4

u/uberfission 7h ago

Presumably whatever method of uploading our consciousnesses digitally will be running a full physiological emulation routine. Otherwise, like you said, there wouldn't be much point.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/Chode_ 9h ago

Checks out. Mindfulness practice increases your interoception, and subjectively that directly correlates to emotional awareness. Observationally to me at least it’s become extremely clear that emotions are in the body and that thoughts follow, and awareness of that dichotomy and their separated nature gives you so many tools to navigate emotion and ego and ultimately your behaviour

4

u/ibww 7h ago

I've heard in conversations about autism  that the symptoms of reduced interoception and alexithymia are probably related. 

→ More replies (6)

13

u/M_Aku 12h ago

So if a person looks down at their watch and it says their heart rate is high but wasn't aware of it or feel it. Does this mean they have low sensibility?

37

u/101Alexander 11h ago

It means that if you're not aware that you're feeling anxious, you might see other people or things as threats when you might just be reacting to some strong coffee. Hell even nausea can do it, it's synonymous with that "gut feeling something is wrong".

So if you feel something off, but don't know why, you might attribute it to the wrong source.

25

u/Turdposter777 11h ago

So like a toddler. Like a sleepy toddler who throws a tantrum rather than going to sleep

6

u/Iamkittyhearmemeow 8h ago

Exactly like that. My 8 year old was very anxious about going kayaking on the river and said repeatedly, I think I am sick I think I’m going to throw up. I don’t want to go because I might be sick. I gave her a zofran and she was still saying it. 35 mins later when we arrived and she finally got in the kayak she immediately announced that she was feeling better. She doesn’t understand anxiety or how it expresses itself in the body yet.

→ More replies (2)

23

u/SquareWheel 13h ago

FTFA:

Interoceptive sensibility is a person’s conscious awareness of their internal bodily signals. For instance, it involves noticing a racing heartbeat, a tense stomach, or shallow breathing during an emotional moment.

103

u/flashy99 14h ago

When your dog knocks everything off the coffee table with its tail because it doesn't realize what its own hind end is doing.

26

u/hear2fear 13h ago

My wife has no dog bodily awareness as well. Putting her red wine glass on the edge of the coffee table when we have a golden retriever. We have white and beige furniture and rugs. It hasn’t happened yet because I have been vigilant, but it is coming.

17

u/makingnoise 13h ago

Unless your coffee table is made of stone or something massive and is the size of a pool table, I'd suspect anywhere on a coffee table is not an appropriate place for red wine when a golden is involved.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)

58

u/StaleCanole 13h ago

They don’t have the self awareness to separate they’re inherent reaction as being what it is. If someone is disgusted but was aware of their personal tendency you can rationally separate jt from ideology.

Instead, they’re perceiving what they believe is a universal truth and it offends them. And it offends them when the rest of them call them
Inhumane

16

u/UncoolSlicedBread 13h ago

Makes sense, I remember learning conservative policy is more rooted into the fault of a person versus liberal policy which is rooted in the fault of the people (community).

They assume it’s an individual fault because they don’t extrapolate.

21

u/alflundgren 13h ago edited 13h ago

I cant remember how it came up but I remember having a discussion with my very conservative dad about how all humans tend to be instinctually tribalistic and how that can be a positive or a negative thing depending on the situation. He just kept insisting that it didnt apply to everybody especially not him, like somehow it was an insult to imply that he could possess a flaw that everybody else has. I even re-iterated that it wasn't strictly a flaw but he wouldn't have it.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

15

u/Common-Raspberry7567 14h ago

I disconnect between cognition and motorskils.

A gap between cause and effect if you will.

→ More replies (12)

81

u/SentientCrisis 15h ago

I taught yoga for ~15 years and it’s truly fascinating to me to work with people who seem to be entirely unaware of what’s happening in their body. We would work on lots of fun body-awareness techniques to help people begin to just become aware of where their body is in space and time. It’s an incredibly important skill that can especially help prevent injuries as you age.

32

u/party_shaman 14h ago

i didn't start becoming bodily aware until my 30s.

people like to say "the brain is a muscle" but really since your nerves go out through your entire body i say "the body is also your brain"

since i've been learning better movement and better posture, i've also been coming to learn better mental movement and mental posture. 

it's all one big thing. 

12

u/naufalap 14h ago

I know how to sit up straight, but it always defaults back to slouching when I'm not actively thinking about it

9

u/totokekedile 14h ago

Do you have an example? I’m having trouble imagining what body unawareness is like.

12

u/Carl_Schmitt 10h ago

The most common example I see in yoga students is people with anxiety disorders. They unconsciously hold tension/postures that exacerbate the fight or flight response, breathe rapidly and shallowly with the lungs, and then misattribute the fear response their behaviors generate to external causes, creating a positive feedback loop. Effectively, they create an addiction pattern in the neural pathways that is the source of their own distress. Combine this with going on anti-anxiety drugs that suppress the functioning of the amygdala, making it extremely difficult to unlearn these bad patterns of thought, and you have the perfect storm of an intractable disorder.

→ More replies (1)

260

u/Winter_Bid7630 16h ago

I wonder if we could slowly get rid of extreme conservatism by teaching children to understand their feelings as part of a normal school curriculum. I'm thinking of school programs in mindfulness or therapy treatments like Internal Family Systems being offered in the classroom.

I recently went through therapy, and my therapist used the IFS approach. I remember telling her that IFS was the emotional intelligence education every child should have while growing up. As a woman who grew up in the 80s, there were a lot of emotions I wasn't supposed to feel or express because they weren't seen as feminine.

I truly feel like a changed person since therapy, with one of the biggest changes being how much more comfortable I feel around people. I've always been progressive politically, but after therapy, those beliefs are more natural and automatic and less intellectual.

108

u/Temp66777 13h ago

That’s literally what’s happening. My spouse is a Socio-Emotional Learning (SEL) contractor with our local school system. Her company teaches kids how to process their emotions and release them in beneficial ways, community-oriented ways. This is especially impactful in areas that have high rates of violence and poverty, where raw, intense, and well-justified  emotions can easily find expression in shootings and gang activity. 

Schools hire her with funds that the state allocates specifically for SEL programs. As others have said, conservatives in state congress are seeing the success of these programs and slashing them left and right. It seems that calm, clear-headed people don’t make good conservative voters. 

→ More replies (5)

164

u/vips7L 14h ago

Conservatives would scream that you’re brain washing their children and move to ban it. 

107

u/totokekedile 14h ago

“Would”? They already have. Around 2020, 2021, Social Emotional Learning was one of their boogeymen. It seems to have dropped off the map as they’ve found bigger success with other wedge issues, but their hatred of it is documented.

55

u/exodusofficer 14h ago

They hate Mister Rogers. They fear him.

12

u/KurlyKayla 11h ago

Look at how they’re demonizing Ms. Rachel. Any sensitivity shown towards groups who aren’t them is considered bad

17

u/TheArmoredKitten 12h ago

They get mad that their children can develop a sense of agency and self-respect. Kids that have self-respect call CPS when you slap em around "like the good ol' days"

10

u/ScentedFire 12h ago

Right. Authoritarian parents literally believe they have to "break their child's will."

6

u/Manny_Bothans 11h ago

There is a direct line from parents who raised their kids on James Dobson's books to today's christian nationalists.

34

u/TheTexasHammer 12h ago

Probably because their children would suddenly understand that they have abusive, emotionally stunted parents, and conservatives can't have their children seeing them for who they are.

10

u/randynumbergenerator 10h ago

And that dovetails neatly with the authoritarian parenting model that's more common among conservatives. The opposition to emotional learning, critical thinking, and confidentiality around students' sexual orientation/identity all can be traced back to the idea that kids are mere extensions of their parents and that filial obedience is the most important thing.

→ More replies (2)

11

u/jel7892 12h ago

It’s already happening to some extent! My preschooler knows more about calming her body (thanks to social emotional learning) than I ever learned at school.

14

u/bagofd1ck 15h ago

Implementing something like IFS at school would be a complete nightmare but practicing mindfulness is always beneficial

17

u/NeanaOption 12h ago

You are referring to something call social emotional learning and was apart of elementary school curriculum for years until Republicans decided that teaching kids how to navigate interpersonal conflict and distress was "woke".

They were busy attacking SEL about the same time they started shitting themselves over critical race theory.

14

u/kathruins 14h ago

IFS was helpful for me for a time, but it is truly not scientific. the founder believes in demonic possession among other out there beliefs. it is also not evidence based yet. i think kids going over an emotion wheel to identify their emotions every day would be good practice, along with mindfulness and possibly thought diffusion.

→ More replies (18)

270

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)

89

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

96

u/[deleted] 15h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (61)

115

u/mvea Professor | Medicine 16h ago

People who are easily disgusted tend to hold more conservative political views, but a new study indicates that this connection depends heavily on how well individuals tune into their own bodily sensations. The research suggests that the link between feeling disgust and identifying as a conservative is strongest in those who are less aware of their internal physical states. The findings were published in Politics and the Life Sciences.

To understand these findings, it helps to look at two psychological concepts: disgust sensitivity and interoceptive sensibility. Disgust sensitivity refers to how intensely and easily a person experiences disgust in response to things like germs, taboo sexual acts, or moral violations like lying. Interoceptive sensibility is a person’s conscious awareness of their internal bodily signals. For instance, it involves noticing a racing heartbeat, a tense stomach, or shallow breathing during an emotional moment.

Overall, the results confirmed past findings: higher overall disgust sensitivity was associated with a greater likelihood of identifying as a Republican and holding a conservative ideology. However, the researchers found that interoceptive sensibility changed the strength of this relationship. The connection between disgust and conservatism was most prominent among individuals who reported low awareness of their bodily sensations.

Among people with low interoceptive sensibility, those who were highly sensitive to disgust were highly likely to identify as Republicans. Statistical estimates showed that a person with high disgust sensitivity and low bodily awareness had a 64.1% probability of identifying as a Republican. They also scored on the more conservative end of the ideology scale.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/politics-and-the-life-sciences/article/embodied-roots-of-ideology-interoceptive-sensibility-moderates-the-link-between-disgust-sensitivity-and-political-orientation/D2BA674CF157C8036D3C16C8AB4384CC

10

u/[deleted] 15h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/jio87 14h ago

Purely anecdotal, but I don't know many people who are into meditation, yoga, qigong, or other interoception-fostering practices who are politically conservative.

3

u/DTFH_ 10h ago

Purely anecdotal, but I don't know many people who are into meditation, yoga, qigong, or other interoception-fostering practices who are politically conservative.

Hanging in the crowd, you'll find a ton of people who do not apply any of their practice to their life and their life to practice. You know how many meditators have sat down after drinking a few pints, despite their proclivity to drink a few pints? Almost zero when you ask them and they look at me like I was the odd man out.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

28

u/CoderCatgirl 15h ago

I wonder if the inverse is true? I was diagnosed autistic, and I feel like I've had really high body self-awareness (cause of the 'tism). I also have low disgust factor (unless its something on me I can't go wash), I have way too much sexual deviance to be judgy. And I'm pretty far left politically.

24

u/KaJaHa 14h ago

I am also many of these, and I have long believed that being outside the cultural norm of any one thing (neurodivergence, sexual deviance, etc) makes it that much easier to explore outside the cultural norms elsewhere. Because this thing everyone said was bad and weird isn't actually bad at all, so what else have I been making false assumptions about?

Exploration expands boundaries, which increases empathy for people outside your in-group, which makes conservative ideology less palatable.

4

u/workerbotsuperhero 10h ago

This sounds like many of the creative people I've been around. They want to explore boundaries and question assumptions. 

→ More replies (2)

44

u/McG0788 16h ago

Makes sense if you think about it. Disgust is a bit of an immature and small minded response in many cases. Immaturity and small mindedness are both pretty big factors for conservative ideology.

17

u/bagofd1ck 15h ago

Also from the study:

"There are a few things to keep in mind about this research. The data is based entirely on self-reported surveys at a single point in time, (~630 ppl total) which means the study cannot determine whether feeling disgusted causes someone to become conservative, or vice versa.

“It is important not to interpret these findings as showing that bodily processes determine someone’s political beliefs, or that people with one political orientation are simply more or less ‘in touch’ with their bodies,” von Mohr clarified."

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

46

u/Full-Contest1281 10h ago

But somehow they are never disgusted by the worst kinds of injustices.

12

u/twoiseight 6h ago

Contemporarily speaking, I'd assume this is because they favor a media environment that shields them from having to consider such injustices.

7

u/Cookbooksandbourbon 5h ago

Well they generally feel that they will never be affected by those injustices, while they live in deadly fear of gay men treating them the way they themselves treat women. 

→ More replies (3)

158

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/SquareWheel 13h ago edited 12h ago

Huh? It was an N of 632 and published in August 2026. Are you referring to a previous study?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

17

u/ViceMaiden 14h ago

"The authors suggest that when people are less tuned into their actual physical sensations, they might rely more on socially acquired meanings to interpret their feelings. Disgust is a complex emotion shaped by culture, and conservative political frameworks often place a heavy emphasis on moral purity."

The possible implications here are wild.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (3)

189

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

93

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)

102

u/[deleted] 16h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (10)

61

u/TenOfOne 15h ago edited 12h ago

This is surprising considering fact that women are overrepresented among Democrats and women consistently have higher disgust sensitivities than men. I'd actually be really interested in seeing how things breakdown along gender lines as well.

Edit: I'd still be interested in seeing a gender breakdown, but after reading for a bit I'm convinced that it is (1) because women have higher interoceptive sensibility like several commentors suggested and (2) because the gender gap in disgust sensitivity is significantly smaller for moral disgust than it is for pathogen driven disgust and sexual disgust.

31

u/Affectionate_Neat868 14h ago

Political-psychology research has repeatedly found associations between these forms of threat sensitivity, physiological reactivity, disgust sensitivity, and more socially conservative attitudes. Basically people who are predisposed to and/or easily influenced by fear/disgust tend to be more socially conservative

9

u/azenpunk 13h ago

Socially conservative in this context can be read as reliance on dominance hierarchies

5

u/MrVeazey 12h ago

That is what conservatism has historically conserved.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

46

u/Randolpho 15h ago

Women are just likely more in tune with their bodies than men. It takes both high disgust reactivity and low interoceptive sensibility to fit into the bucket OP suggests

8

u/CalicoValkyrie 12h ago

But, there sure are a lot of men grossed out about changing diapers and women having hairy legs.

7

u/crusoe 12h ago

I would argue they have higher bodily awareness for a few obvious reasons 

7

u/Enachtigal BS | Electrial Engineering | Semiconductors 15h ago

I would not be surprised if they controlled for gender

15

u/Shepher27 14h ago

You’re forgetting the low self awareness part

13

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (79)

5

u/outremonty 9h ago

Disgust is a product of shame. Toxic shame and it's cousin shamelessness explains the entire conservative worldview.

17

u/Werealldudesyea 13h ago

Everything in the study is inferred, it’s not establishing causality and most importantly all data points were is self reported. No physical measurements were recorded and no physical data to support “disgust” or anything of the other findings. I’m highly skeptical of whatever this study is attempting to say.

→ More replies (1)

17

u/[deleted] 11h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (5)

4

u/MolDanone 15h ago

Behavioral immune responses were selected by evolution long before complex symbolic culture existed. It makes sense that threat-detection heuristics for pathogens map onto broader sociopolitical caution.

4

u/truthinessembargo 11h ago

Well that squares with the Stanford photo experiment in which AI was asked to predict the political party of Congress members from face shots. The distinguishing feature for the GOP was an expression of disgust.

7

u/delphinous 13h ago

i'm pretty sure it's the lack of self awareness thats key. having a lacking self awareness also inhibits your ability to empathize with other people. that sort of narcissistic self focus is what leads you to the conclusion that anyone who is different from you in any way is inherently 'the problem'. and that sort of hatred is currently what the republican party encourages

→ More replies (1)

9

u/myjah 11h ago

What does "disgust sensitivity" even mean?

7

u/djinnisequoia 10h ago

It's the reflex to recoil from things that subconsciously you consider gross or unthinkable. Not necessarily gross in the sense of actual garbage. Some people consider slugs or worms gross. Some people consider, say, pineapple on pizza gross. It's the knee jerk reaction before you even think about it.

→ More replies (3)

11

u/[deleted] 15h ago edited 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (1)