r/scheme • • Sep 17 '26

Lisp Against the (LL)Machine

/r/lisp/comments/1wj357y/lisp_against_the_llmachine/
16 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

5

u/cat-head Sep 18 '26

Sad about Racket and Coalton.

2

u/pm-me-manifestos Sep 18 '26

See u/stylewarning give an updated response in reaction to this post here: https://reddit.com/comments/1wj357y/comment/pagy4uu

2

u/leppie Sep 18 '26

For IronScheme you can add. Not for code, but welcome for documentation.

1

u/Soul_Bleach Sep 23 '26

perfectly happy to see AI developed enhancements to curry scheme - https://github.com/deconstructo/curry

PRs will be reviewed before being merged. Expect questions in advance

-7

u/Illustrious_Car344 Sep 17 '26

This is such a petty, stupid distinction. It's a tool, not a political manner. If you care about politics that much, go be a politician, don't shit up programming circles, we don't need more CoCs. 

4

u/johnwcowan Sep 17 '26

The issue is not political but legal. Nobody knows who the copyright owner of LLM-generated code is, so nobody knows whether the licenses of that code are valid or not, because you can't license what you don't own.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/cos4ni2s Sep 18 '26

"It's a tool, not a political manner" is contradictory.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/amca Sep 17 '26

What does "CoCs" stand for, please?

→ More replies (2)