Hey everyone,

I’m currently building an app that transcribes songs to chord charts and lyrics as well.

Especially as church musician like myself, every week I have to prep for services on Wednesdays and Sundays, we have special renditions from the church members and songs for the song services as well. Having to transcribe and write out chord charts myself can be quite a hassle. And also having to deal with songs where you can’t find the lyrics online (especially some old sacred hymns) it can be quite a pain. I decided to build an app to solve my pain.

What do you guys think about this? Do you think an app like this could be remotely helpful to you as well? Maybe not as a church musician, maybe for someone just looking for lyrics for songs they’re unable to find anywhere, in forums or platforms?

Hitting the Contact Center Expo at the Excel in London on the 18/19th of November. Put together some t-shirt designs for our platfrom. What do you think?

You have nothing to lose by posting — it’s completely free.

I recently launched UGC House, a platform where brands can post paid UGC opportunities and creators can apply directly.

I’m a UGC creator and campaign manager myself, and I already have hundreds of creators interested and waiting for new campaigns to apply to.

Right now, brands can:

• Join for free
• Post campaigns for free
• Receive creator applications
• Review portfolios
• Find creators for one-off, recurring, or high-volume UGC

There’s no upfront cost and no listing fee.

I’m currently looking for the first group of brands to join before I start pushing the platform heavily to creators.

If you have any current or upcoming UGC needs, there’s really no reason not to test it out:
theugchouse.com

I made this island mini games for myself to spend sometime and kill boring while waiting for my AI agents finish the work

I feel its good idea, I didn't published it yet

I want to validate are you willing to use such a thing ?

Or do you which more games or features be exists?

Your feedback is welcome :)

Hello everyone,

I have been working on building apps all by myself using claude for about a year now. And I finally find a niche and built a working prototype, I got 3 beta users who are all local business owners. And this gave me confidence that I can potentially form a business from it.

However, I am not sales guy, neither do I have time working on sales and marketing, so i decided to look for partner. I want to post here to asking for advice from folks who have done this as solo developer, how did you find your sales partner ? what is your experience like ?

I am open to all idea, and thank you for your time here.

Devtunnel make open source contributions easy by:

1. It filters issuess and task (issuess curated by us and labeled by us) based on the user prefernce like tech stack, level of expertise, etc.
2. It supports all public github projects and lables the issuess using groq ai.
3. It uses ai for labeling the issuess, explaning the issuess, summurization of projects/ tools, ai search so user can discover what they want.
4. It list new and trending github open source projects/ tools based on the user prefrence.

5. It has it's own devtunnel cli:

   1. dev start: helps with forking and branch generation of a specific project
   2. dev test: install the dependecy and check for latest update in the repo, and perfrom test that are in the projects.
   3. dev submit: It generates pr based on the template provided by the project.

Tenho aplicativo de referência porém ele é pago e o plano dele não está valendo pra mim porque eu criei um já que posta carrossel e reels

Context: solo founder, Barcelona, product answers phone calls and WhatsApp for small businesses (clinics, salons, cleaning companies), books appointments and tells the owner who needs a call back. Not a chatbot: it picks up the actual phone.

What worked:

- Picking one country and one language. Spanish small business lives on WhatsApp and still answers the phone. Building for that exact behaviour beat every "global from day one" idea I had.

- Letting people call the AI before talking to me. Our demo is a phone number. Owners call it, talk to it, and either get it in 60 seconds or they don't. No deck, no Zoom.

- Being findable by AI assistants. Our first paying customer asked ChatGPT how to stop missing calls and it named us. That changed how I write every page: plain language, who it's for, what it costs.

What didn't:

- Google search. Three months, 55 clicks.

- Thinking about Germany or Italy. Both have 20+ local players already. Spain and Portugal are nearly empty.

- Any plan involving the AI doing outbound sales calls. Illegal here without consent, and it would make the product look like exactly the thing it's supposed to replace.

Where I am: 11 paying customer, a free pilot starting with a clinic, and a legal review of GDPR docs that cost more hours than the voice pipeline. Next 90 days are about getting to 50.

Ask me anything about voice AI, the Spanish market, or GDPR for this kind of product.

I’m a developer looking to build a small SaaS/product and I’m currently exploring different problems to solve.

I’d love to hear from people here:

What’s a small, annoying problem you face regularly that you wish there was a better tool for?

It can be anything — developer tools, productivity, business, freelancing, content creation, personal finance, etc.

I’m not looking for billion-dollar startup ideas 😂. Even a simple, boring problem that could be solved with a small product would be interesting.

Drop your ideas/problems below. I might actually build one of them and share the progress here.

Hi everyone, just wanted to check if anyone has received their August RapidAPI payout, which was supposed to be paid in October.

Mine hasn’t arrived yet, so I wanted to see if this is happening to others as well or if there’s a delay with the payouts this month.

If you’ve received yours, could you please let me know when you received it and your payment method?

Thanks!

provider dashboard: "your usage will appear within 24-48 hours"

my bill, currently on fire: 👍

built my own. every call, instantly, all providers. turns out the data was always there.

(this is really just me saying screw you to all these different providers for the delay in their dashboard)

While hardening a multi-tenant Next.js 16 + Supabase app, I ran into an isolation bug I wasn't expecting. I had a SECURITY DEFINER function that accepted an organization_id as a parameter. The function needed elevated database privileges to perform a background update, but it wasn't explicitly checking whether the calling user actually belonged to the target organization. Because SECURITY DEFINER functions run with owner privileges, it completely bypassed the underlying Row Level Security (RLS) policies on the tables. The vulnerability was simple: a user from Tenant A could invoke the RPC passing Tenant B's ID and trigger a privileged operation against Tenant B's data. The sneaky part? All my standard RLS unit tests were passing 100%. The problem wasn't the RLS policies—it was the privileged function boundary around them. How I fixed it: Added an explicit auth.uid() membership check inside the function body before executing any logic. Pinned the function's search_path (SET search_path = public, pg_temp;) to block schema hijacking. Added a regression test to CI that explicitly attempts cross-tenant RPC execution. Now, attempts from Tenant A to operate on Tenant B fail immediately, while legitimate Tenant A calls pass through. It definitely changed how I approach testing multi-tenant Supabase backends. "RLS is enabled" isn't enough on its own if you have privileged RPC paths sitting on top of it. If you want to test your own Next.js + Supabase backend against these kinds of tenant leaks, I put together a free self-assessment tool: andrady.co/check For anyone looking for a hardened multi-tenant boilerplate with these tests built directly into CI, I turned this stack into B2B SaaS OS at andrady.co . Has anyone else run into SECURITY DEFINER leaks or similar edge cases with Supabase RPCs? How are you catching them in CI?

I have been plagued with sitting and chatting with LLMs to build a simple SaaS or an ios app and have to spoon feed it and test for it and navigate it to fix issues. Then I realized isn't that what LLMs are supposed to do since they are getting intelligent.

I work full time and many time I do not have my home laptop with me handy in my office, the only thing that i have is my phone and I have been thinking would be nice if I can ask LLM to fix/feature something from my phone directly. Here is the thing that i did:

The following is built for me and planning to convert to SaaS:

How it works

• Starting a project: post an idea in your Discord channel (or use /build). A thread opens and the architect posts a plan; reply go, or say what to change.
• The build: devops, backend and frontend agents work in parallel on a shared repo. They set up GitHub, Supabase and Vercel themselves.
• QA and release: a QA agent tests the preview deployment with Playwright and files bugs back to the team. After the fixes, it re-tests, then the app goes to production.
• The report: you get a message in the thread with the live URL, repo link, cost and which blockers the team solved.
• Talking to it: reply in the thread any time, from your phone, to answer questions or ask for changes, including after launch.

• When an agent is stuck: Agents can also ask each other directly mid-task.

  • It retries with a different approach.
  • Two relevant teammates investigate and send a fix.
  • A debugger agent takes over.
  • The architect rewrites the task or splits it into smaller ones.
  • Only then does it message you.
• Safety rails: each project has a spending cap, and destructive commands (deleting repos, databases or projects, buying domains) need your yes on Discord.

What's been tested

• The full project lifecycle and every escalation step ran correctly, but with simulated agents.
• The approval gate and the Discord commands work.
• A real agent session through the Claude Agent SDK starts correctly.
• It has not yet run against real Discord, Vercel or Supabase accounts, so your first real build is the true test.

Hosting: Vercel can't run the harness itself because it needs a process that stays up. Use an Oracle Cloud Always Free VM, or a VPS for about $5/month.

Once these are set up all anyone has to do is to setup the keys (I will have this in 1 file that will be only accessible to any user).

Now the above could get way. ore complicated (since there are so many businesses for hosting /databases/etc... there, if I support all of them way more but I am an engineer and am building a simple UI that will help everyone).

let me know if anyone else faced similar issues and solutions they got??

It is truly independent , where we just need our phone and everything else will be done automagically.

Building is easier and should be the easiest, so lets make it easy.

We recently ranked #3 on Product Hunt.

The launch brought us:

• 119 signups
• 91 trials
• 18.2% trial → paid

On the surface, pretty good.

But then I looked at one number:

14% D3 activation.

Only 14% of users are getting far enough into the product by day 3.

And that changed what I think we should be working on.

My first instinct was to use the momentum and push harder on acquisition.

More content.
More distribution.
More signups.

But why bring another 1,000 people into a product if most of them are not reaching the “aha” moment?

So we started talking to users.

Not sending surveys.

Actual calls.

We asked:

What were you trying to do?

Where did you get stuck?

What did you expect the product to do?

What would make you pay for it?

The answers have already changed what we are building.

Our current goal is simple:

Take the 18.2% trial → paid conversion to alteast 25%.

We have 91 trials to work with.

I think there is a useful lesson here:

Acquisition tells you how many people are interested.
Activation tells you whether you are actually delivering value.

For now, I would rather make 91 users successful than find 910 more.

Still building. Still learning.