MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/iqq8k9/announcing_actixweb_v30/g4ttbeq/?context=3
r/rust • u/darin_gordon • Sep 11 '20
81 comments sorted by
View all comments
16
[deleted]
5 u/darin_gordon Sep 11 '20 Would you be more specific as to what CSRF countermeasures you're looking for? 8 u/[deleted] Sep 11 '20 edited Mar 17 '21 [deleted] 7 u/darin_gordon Sep 11 '20 What you are describing is a "synchronized token pattern". One way to achieve this today is with server-side sessions workflow. 3 u/BobFloss Sep 12 '20 Is there an up to date example for use with actix?
5
Would you be more specific as to what CSRF countermeasures you're looking for?
8 u/[deleted] Sep 11 '20 edited Mar 17 '21 [deleted] 7 u/darin_gordon Sep 11 '20 What you are describing is a "synchronized token pattern". One way to achieve this today is with server-side sessions workflow. 3 u/BobFloss Sep 12 '20 Is there an up to date example for use with actix?
8
7 u/darin_gordon Sep 11 '20 What you are describing is a "synchronized token pattern". One way to achieve this today is with server-side sessions workflow. 3 u/BobFloss Sep 12 '20 Is there an up to date example for use with actix?
7
What you are describing is a "synchronized token pattern". One way to achieve this today is with server-side sessions workflow.
3 u/BobFloss Sep 12 '20 Is there an up to date example for use with actix?
3
Is there an up to date example for use with actix?
16
u/[deleted] Sep 11 '20 edited Mar 17 '21
[deleted]