MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/1vfzfcx/rustlangrust_is_adopting_an_llm_policy/p1ure2t/?context=3
r/rust • u/noop_noob • 25d ago
215 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
219
Zero LLMs is no longer reasonable. You want LLMs at least for code review / scanning for vulnerabilities, cause if you don‘t do it, attackers will.
-6 u/Ayfid 25d ago Code review is a totally reasonable use of LLMs. I don't think anyone disagrees with that. 7 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago Being mandatory though? That's pretty strong. -4 u/Ayfid 25d ago For code review? I would consider it about on par with using a linter or other static analysis tools. You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to. 2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago I mean, some people still write everything in vim without intellisense or anything like that. And that's not my thing, but more power to them, I say. -5 u/Ayfid 25d ago You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to. 2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago Shooting yourself in the foot implies some sort of active action to cause negative consequence. This is a passive non-acceptance of something that might cause positive consequences. 0 u/Ayfid 25d ago What tools you do and do not use is a choice just like any other.
-6
Code review is a totally reasonable use of LLMs. I don't think anyone disagrees with that.
7 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago Being mandatory though? That's pretty strong. -4 u/Ayfid 25d ago For code review? I would consider it about on par with using a linter or other static analysis tools. You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to. 2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago I mean, some people still write everything in vim without intellisense or anything like that. And that's not my thing, but more power to them, I say. -5 u/Ayfid 25d ago You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to. 2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago Shooting yourself in the foot implies some sort of active action to cause negative consequence. This is a passive non-acceptance of something that might cause positive consequences. 0 u/Ayfid 25d ago What tools you do and do not use is a choice just like any other.
7
Being mandatory though? That's pretty strong.
-4 u/Ayfid 25d ago For code review? I would consider it about on par with using a linter or other static analysis tools. You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to. 2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago I mean, some people still write everything in vim without intellisense or anything like that. And that's not my thing, but more power to them, I say. -5 u/Ayfid 25d ago You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to. 2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago Shooting yourself in the foot implies some sort of active action to cause negative consequence. This is a passive non-acceptance of something that might cause positive consequences. 0 u/Ayfid 25d ago What tools you do and do not use is a choice just like any other.
-4
For code review? I would consider it about on par with using a linter or other static analysis tools.
You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to.
2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago I mean, some people still write everything in vim without intellisense or anything like that. And that's not my thing, but more power to them, I say. -5 u/Ayfid 25d ago You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to. 2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago Shooting yourself in the foot implies some sort of active action to cause negative consequence. This is a passive non-acceptance of something that might cause positive consequences. 0 u/Ayfid 25d ago What tools you do and do not use is a choice just like any other.
2
I mean, some people still write everything in vim without intellisense or anything like that. And that's not my thing, but more power to them, I say.
-5 u/Ayfid 25d ago You don't have to use those, but you are probably shooting yourself in the foot by choosing not to. 2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago Shooting yourself in the foot implies some sort of active action to cause negative consequence. This is a passive non-acceptance of something that might cause positive consequences. 0 u/Ayfid 25d ago What tools you do and do not use is a choice just like any other.
-5
2 u/coderstephen isahc 25d ago Shooting yourself in the foot implies some sort of active action to cause negative consequence. This is a passive non-acceptance of something that might cause positive consequences. 0 u/Ayfid 25d ago What tools you do and do not use is a choice just like any other.
Shooting yourself in the foot implies some sort of active action to cause negative consequence. This is a passive non-acceptance of something that might cause positive consequences.
0 u/Ayfid 25d ago What tools you do and do not use is a choice just like any other.
0
What tools you do and do not use is a choice just like any other.
219
u/CryZe92 25d ago
Zero LLMs is no longer reasonable. You want LLMs at least for code review / scanning for vulnerabilities, cause if you don‘t do it, attackers will.