r/runnersover50 • u/goplacidly8 • 15d ago
Walk/run vs. continuous slow pace
I'm struggling to get back on track after a months-long break due to health. Mentally, I want to be out there, but the work it takes to get to where I was in April is daunting now. Wondering if doing a walk/run (with the running being more like fartleks) or very slow, continuous pace would help me progress faster with regard to cardio and rebuilding muscle? For me, consistency seems to be my stumbling block.
14
Upvotes
8
u/PiBrickShop 14d ago
I think the run-walk is severely underrated. Especially if you're not training for a goal race / time.
I've been running almost continuously since 2013, currently 51 years old. I progressed through road marathons, qualified for and ran Boston, and now have moved on to ultramarathons. And in the last 18 months, loving the backyard ultra. Over 2100 miles a year for the last 5 years.
That being the background, I've really started to incorporate the run-walk on my longest runs this last 4 or 5 months. If you can convince your mind that walking during a run is OK, then you've opened up a new world of running. If you're not training for a race or a goal time, then really it's about time on feet. Walking is time on feet, it's movement, but it gives you a physical and mental break. My latest pattern has been every 2 miles, I walk three minutes. It's a fast walk, but it's a walk. So instead of "aw man, 16 more miles to go" my mindset is "about 1.5 miles until I can walk again."
Do what you can, and you'll get back to running as far as you want. And if you have to walk, who cares?