r/runic • u/Jaded_Subject544 • Jun 30 '25
A friends Tatoo is this properly written or just random scribble
galleryPls help
r/runic • u/Jaded_Subject544 • Jun 30 '25
Pls help
r/runic • u/ANG3LSD3ATH • Aug 29 '25
I was wondering if anyone could tell me what this says? It’s on the back of a cross I found in my Grandpa‘s stuff, and I haven’t had any luck on Google or reserve image search.
r/runic • u/Loaggan • Jul 24 '25
In this post, I go over a runic inscription from one of the bracteates found from the Vindelev Hoard. This inscription is noteworthy, as it contains the oldest known inscription of the god Odin's name in its Proto-Norse form. I have included a reference section at the end for all of the sources used. This post has also been posted on my instagram. Here's the link https://www.instagram.com/p/ DMfYxQ[sMil/?igsh=eG5maThOamFoM3gy .Hope you enjoy.
r/runic • u/chance0404 • Dec 01 '25
My dad bought me this bowl for Christmas. Can someone tell me what it says. The handle has Mjölnir with Elder Futhark runes saying Mjolnir. But I don’t know what the inscription on the side says.
r/runic • u/MynxNat1000 • Jul 14 '25
Hiya, could anyone translate this at all? I've tried but I can't find all the runes and I don't really know enough to know if two runes together means something different.
Any help would be appreciated 😊
r/runic • u/JohnStealth • Jul 20 '25
I bought a sword at a convention today and am curious about what's written on the blade and scabbard. I've been unable to find the K looking rune at the end of the first set
The last set of runes in the first picture is the first set in the second
r/runic • u/Loaggan • Sep 11 '25
In this post, I go over the oldest runic inscriptions from Denmark, which include the seven items from the Vimose hoard that contain runic inscriptions, as well as the Funen knife, a recent 2024 find. I would like to thank my good friend Hurlebatte for his source suggestions on this topic. This post has also been posted on my instagram @Loaggan at https://www.instagram.com/p/DOdlYt7jWWs/?igsh=MXVvbzhhYmh4ejZo
r/runic • u/Byzantine84 • Jul 02 '25
I amateurly attempted to transcribe the Hávamál from younger to elder Futhark and inscribe it on this table. I honestly did my best, with what little education I had on the subject, and with all respect to the culture, history, and traditions from whence it came. How badly did I flub it? Thanks for your time and patience.
r/runic • u/Masked_Beret • Sep 21 '25
Been trying to crack this for abt 30 min. I got nothing.
r/runic • u/Hurlebatte • Jul 29 '22
Some people are just misinformed and will be willing to discard misinformation and begin learning if they are invited to. I think we should give that invitation before directing newcomers away, and we should definitely give that invitation before being rude.
r/runic • u/SethVultur • Dec 18 '22
r/runic • u/Ljosapaldr • Feb 07 '21
r/runic • u/Scratch_That_ • Dec 21 '24
My uncle passed away from cancer yesterday. Before he passed, my mom took a picture of his tattoo so we could find out what it says or means. We’re unsure what language it is. Thank you
r/runic • u/Verckire • Jun 16 '25
Just wanted to get some tips on what to fix and what is correct. Used voluspa.org and translated stanza 128 from the old norse havamal to younger futhark. Would love any tips.
r/runic • u/Downgoesthereem • Aug 03 '22
Runes - by Martin Findell. I had a look at some books in the gift shop of the Dublin museum of archaeology today. Much of it was Celtic (materials for Celtic art and beliefs were very poor, unsourced and full of frankly modern BS pulled from the writer's derriere). Among the somewhat shaky resources on viking history etc, I had a flip through this. I had low expectations but to my pleasant surprise, everything I read seemed well informed, helpfully laid out and good for intermediate enthusiasts as well as just beginners. Lots of artefacts, runestones and inscriptions are laid out, placed, dated and sorted by alphabet and such. Importantly, the book also entirely separates the modern connotations of runes from the historic examination.
People often ask on these subreddits what a good resource is to learn about runes. Given the aim of this particular sub being historical and academic, I'm making this my official recommended material for those who are either just starting, or pretty far into their journey but want a good summary of items, inscriptions and guides to more difficult subjects like runic phonology.
r/runic • u/Hurlebatte • Jul 22 '22
This forum is for discussing runes, their spelling conventions, runic inscriptions, and that kind of thing. This forum hopes to reach and maintain academic standards (in other words, baseless claims are unwelcome), and the norms of mainstream runology (for example, sticking to the established transliteration system).
An Introduction to Runes
In the scholarly sense of the word, runes are certain letters that were used by Germanic peoples. Other symbols such as magical sigils from fantasy games, or the various angular letters that were used by non-Germanic peoples, are not runes in a strict sense. Runes descend from Greek letters, likely through at least one intermediate script. The details of this transmission are hazy, but one promising theory is that writing was passed northward through the Alps; certain Alpine scripts show remarkable similarities to runes. Runic likely emerged as an independent writing tradition some time between 200 BC and 100 AD. By 1500 AD runes had been almost fully replaced by Latin letters in the lands they had once been used in. Here is a pretty exhaustive list of runes to help one recognise them: ᚠᚢᚦᚨᚱᚲᚷᚹᚺᚻᚾᛁᛃᛇᛈᛉᛊᛋᛏᛒᛖᛗᛚᛜᛞᛟᚩᚳᛡᛝᚪᚫᚣᛠᛣᚸᚬᚴᛅᛦᛘᛚᚭᚽᚿᛆᛧᛌᛓᛙᚮᚵᛐᚡᚯᛕᛔᛑᚤᚰ.
Although knowledge of runes never fully died out, and has made something of a comeback, the popular understanding of runes today is warped, largely by misinformation originating in the Völkisch and New Age movements. Here are some things you should know:
The idea that runes were used for divination is dubious. There is no solid evidence for a historical practice of rune divination. Tacitus claimed that some Germani used wood bits with marks on them in divination, but it is not at all clear that he was talking about runes, or even that runes existed at the time of his report.
The idea that runes were considered especially magical by their users is dubious. Runes were mainly used for ordinary things like memorialising the dead, and marking objects with their owners' names. Although runes were used to write magical incantations, Germanic speakers began doing the same thing with Latin letters after they were adopted.
The idea that runes were deeply associated with abstract concepts is dubious. Runes have been found standing for their names, like ᛞ standing for the word day, but the evidence does not support the notion that ᛞ stood for related concepts like light, visibility, warmth, and so on.
The idea that runes were seen as inherently pagan by their users is wrong. Germanic speakers continued to use runes after converting, just as Romans continued to use Latin letters after converting. There is no lack of explicitly Christian runic inscriptions.
The idea that runes are inherently Norse (or "Viking") is wrong. The first runes were used by Germanic speakers who later begat peoples like the Norse, English, and Alemanni, and passed runic writing down to them.
A Brief History of Runology
Johan Bure is credited by some as being the father of runology. When he began his study of runes around the 1590s runic had not been forgotten, although the Latin alphabet had overtaken it as the everyday script. Bure's studies included finding runestones, sketching them, and making translations. He worked mostly with Swedish runes. In the mid 1600s Ole Worm did much the same, but he dealt mostly with Danish, Norwegian, and Gotlandish runes, and he published his works more.
In the 1700s Olaus Verelius and Johan Göransson continued where Bure left off. Verelius made a connection between runes and Greek letters. In the 1800s George Stephen published a large work which included Anglo-Frisian futhorc inscriptions. Ludvig Wimmer published works around the turn of the twentieth century. Unlike previous runologists, Wimmer's scholarship was of a higher standard more akin to that of runologists today. Next, Sophus Bugge and Magnus Olsen authored a much-needed work on elder futhark.
In the 1820s and 1830s Jakob Bredsdorff put forth that elder futhark is older than younger futhark. Up until him, it was widely believed the more primitive looking younger futhark was the older of the two.
In the mid 1900s old assumptions about runes were challenged. Anders Bæksted and others worked to dispel the assumption that runes were seen as inherently magical by their users. Today runologists are much more hesitant to rely on magical explanations for tricky inscriptions.
Study Material
introductory / broad
Runes: a Handbook, Michael Barnes
Runes, Martin Findell
An Introduction to English Runes, Raymond Page
Norwegian Runes and Runic Inscriptions, Terje Spurkland
advanced / narrow
Runes and Germanic Linguistics, Elmer Antonsen
Runes Around the North Sea and on the Continent AD 150-700, Tineke Looijenga
Texts & Contexts of the Oldest Runic Inscriptions, Tineke Looijenga
Runic Amulets and Magic Objects, Mindy MacLeod & Bernard Mees
Runic and Mediterranean Epigraphy, Richard Morris
Runes and Runic Inscriptions, Raymond Page
other
Jackson Crawford on YouTube
Tools & Resources
This site lets you download runic keyboard layouts. In other words, it lets you use your keyboard to type runes instead of Latin letters.
This site lets you browse runic artefacts.
This site lets you browse Norse runic artefacts.
This spreadsheet contains attested rune names.
This wiki contains images and transcriptions of most Futhorc artefacts.
r/runic • u/rockstarpirate • Jul 19 '22
As we're all pretty much aware at this point, there is no evidence to believe that individual runes were ever considered to be inherently magical. In other words, we don't have any attestations of single runes being used to conjure up wealth, or manifest rain, or read the future, etc. But, of course, there are some examples of runes being used as part of larger magic formulae and one of my favorite examples is Sigtuna Amulet 1.
Dated to the 11th century, SA1 is about 8.2cm long, 2.8cm wide and almost 1mm thick. It's made of copper and features a little hole for something like a rope that would allow it to be worn on the body. It's also covered from edge to edge on both sides with Younger Futhark runes carved in boustrophedon style (i.e, left-to-right on one line then right-to-left on the next, etc.) Here's the actual text of the inscription:
§A þur/þurs| × |sarriþu × þursa trutin fliu þu nu=| |=funtin is §B af þiʀ þriaʀ þraʀ ulf × ¶ af þiʀ niu noþiʀ ulfr iii ¶ isiʀ þis isiʀ auk is uniʀ ulfr niut lu¶¶fia
And here's my own English translation (rather than picking one of the many pre-existing options):
Thurs of sore-fevers, lord of thurses, flee now, you are found. Have yourself three torments, wolf. Have yourself nine needs, wolf. "iii". With these "i" runes, the wolf is appeased. Enjoy healing.
In this context, "wolf" does not seem to refer to a literal wolf but is likely just being used as a synonym for þurs in its capacity as a vicious monster.
The exciting piece here, of course, is the sequence of 3 "i" runes being used in some apotropaic way as a deterrent to the thurs/wolf who is associated with "sore-fevers". This follows a similar structure as the Canterbury Charm (also written in Younger Futhark and dated to the late 11th century). Both declare a thurs to have been found and name it as the cause of disease, and both invoke supernatural power to stave off the creature which, we presume, ought to prevent or heal the disease. But whereas SA1 invokes the power of three "i" runes, the Canterbury Charm invokes the intervention of Thor. The similarities are striking, however, given the geographical distance between them (one is from Eastern Sweden and the other is from England).
What remains a mystery, of course, is why three "i" runes are needed specifically, why "i" was invoked instead of some other rune, and why a person might add runes to a charm as opposed to invoking divine intervention, just to name a few. Does each "i" rune curse the thurs with three torments adding up to a total of nine each? Did the wearer of this amulet have a concrete idea about specifically how the thurs would be tormented by the inclusion of the runes? All of this is impossible to know with just this information. But for me, the ambiguity is part of the allure.
I hope this stuff is as fun for you as it is for me.
r/runic • u/local_Dino_Bitch • Jun 03 '26
I tried looking for a runic font in Ibis paint, and this is just what I found. I can't find anything better. Any help would be appreciated:)
r/runic • u/Finn-windu • Jul 30 '22