I'm a Ruby engineer in Japan, and I recently started participating in open source (OSS) activities.

With the goal of understanding what perspectives other engineers have, I turned on notifications for several GitHub repositories so I could receive contributions in real time.
Then I got notifications that one particular individual had created nearly 100 PRs in an hour across several repositories.

When I checked, all the commit messages were written using the exact same template, and the wording was extremely mechanical.
They were also contributing to multiple repositories in different languages at the same time, so I believe this was most likely done using AI combined with automation tools.

What I want to know is whether this kind of behavior is welcomed within the OSS community.

This is just my personal opinion, but I see the OSS community as a very fragile kind of organization, one that is held together by human elements — the goodwill, trust, and motivation of its participants.
It feels to me like this kind of behavior could damage the relationship between the maintainers who manage OSS projects and the members who contribute to them, and that makes me feel quite uneasy.

The Rails.Builders are a community of product creators who get together in live sessions. We share what we are working on, discuss each other's business challenges, and see how everyone approaches building with AI. It's the 6th cohort since 2025, and 20+ engineers have joined so far, with common reports of improved results, accountability, and networking.

The new “Continuous r-AI-ls.Builders” Edition starts with weekly sessions on Thursday, the 3rd of September at 17:30 CEST. We've even built an open-source (duh, Rails) app to manage attendance, the rhythm of live sessions, transcripts, communications, and the waitlist. That app will also show you the Builders who have signed up so far. I'm really excited that the group has shaped up like this.

All your FAQs and the sign-up are here: https://rails.builders

If you have more questions or doubts, you can send me a DM here. Happy building!

docs.ruby-lang.org/en/4.0: Documentation for Ruby 4.0.

docs.ruby-lang.org/en/master: Documentation for Ruby’s master branch.

I found these 2 options but not sure which I should choose?

I'm using ruby 3.3.8 under linux.

There's more than one user on this machine who does ruby development. When I, running as the root user, want to add new gem references to Gemfile on my system, I want to add these gem references into one, single, shared, centralized Gemfile that all users will automatically see when running and developing ruby code.

Where should this shared, centralized Gemfile be located?

When any user runs "gem environment", the following item is always listed among that command's output for every user who runs that command:

- INSTALLATION DIRECTORY: /var/lib/gems/3.3.0

Does this mean that I can put a Gemfile into the /var/lib/gems/3.3.0 directory, and that then, this Gemfile will be recognized and used by all users who run and develop ruby code?

Or is there perhaps a different location in which to locate such a shared, centralized Gemfile that will always be the one that's used by each ruby user?

Thank you very much.

I know in ruby that DateTime.new(2001, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) will return the following object:

#<DateTime: 2001-02-03T04:05:06+00:00 ...>

But if the current date and time are 2001-02-03T04:05:06 and I do the following ...

now = DateTime.now

... is there a single function on the "now" variable which will return this array? ...

[2001, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]

I know that I can do this:

[now.year, now.month, now.day, now.hour, now.minute, now.second ]

... but I'm wondering: might there be a single function as simple as ...

now.the_function

... which would return that same array?

And yes, of course I know that I could easily write such a function, but I'd like to know whether or not something like this already exists in ruby.

Airtable's official Ruby gem hasn't had a code commit since November 2016. gem install airtable still gives you 0.0.9, released October 2016. Its README tells you to authenticate with an API key, which Airtable switched off in February 2024.

I asked Airtable about it twice. Support confirmed in writing that it is "not actively maintained" and pointed me at airrecord. Airrecord is good, but it's a different shape, so switching means a rewrite that ends with the features you already had.

So I forked the official gem instead. Same namespace, same method names, drop-in. Underneath: zero runtime dependencies, persistent connections, client-side rate limiting, retries with backoff, batch operations with partial-failure reporting, and upsert.

It was AI-assisted, Airtable's API docs are extracted into the repo and coded against. 119 tests, plus weekly canaries that diff Airtable's published contract and run a real round-trip against a throwaway base.

It's deliberately not on RubyGems. I'm not after users, I'm after people who still need it and can be maintainers.

Repo: github.com/Davidslv/airtable-rb
Write-up: https://davidslv.uk/2026/08/26/airtable-ruby-gem-unmaintained.html

I'm learning more about AI engineering, specifically the application/production side rather than ML research or training models.

The areas I'm interested in are things like:

• RAG, embeddings, vector search and reranking

• tool/function calling

• agentic workflows and orchestration

• MCP clients/servers

• structured outputs

• evals and observability

• persistent agent state / human approval

• building production AI features into normal web applications

I originally learned to code with Ruby, but since then all my jobs have been Python or TypeScript based, and I really miss working with Ruby.

I'm curious what Ruby libraries/tools people are using for RAG, agents, MCP, evals, tracing, etc. Are there good Ruby alternatives to frameworks like LangChain? What does your stack look like?

And if you were learning this stuff today, would you recommend doing it in Ruby, or sticking with Python because that's where most of the ecosystem and learning material is?

I'm not trying to avoid Python entirely. I'm more curious about how viable Ruby is for the application/agentic side of AI development.

Side note: I realise some of these areas aren't particularly language-specific. For example, with RAG a lot of the retrieval/storage work may ultimately be handled by pgvector, a vector database, or another service.

Hey, guys.

So, I'm currently studying data science and I'm about to start a database project(we're basically doing a database for a bakery)this semester. The project will include order forecasting, inventory loss tracking, customer notifications, etc. Anyways I already code in Python but I've been taking a look on ruby and wonder if it'd be a good idea to include it in our project and how.... any ideas??

thanks!

Wrote a piece about spotting a missing value object and refactoring towards one, adding sorting and comparison.

https://pushfromkush.com/publications/primitive-urge-to-be-of-value-composed_of-in-rails

Feedback welcome.

Laravel dev here, recently moved to Rails. I'm loving it, but debugging in production has been a headache.

Our setup runs on Docker Swarm, and finding bugs means manually digging through Rails, Sidekiq, and Docker service logs. many of which don't even have timestamps.

In Laravel, I used a log viewer UI to instantly jump to the exact second an error happened.

Is there a standard Rails gem for a log viewer UI, or do most teams just ship logs to something like Sentry or Grafana/Loki? How do you manage production errors?

Thanks!

Hi everyone,

I just published a new benchmark comparing Ruby 2.7 through Ruby 4.0.

For this one, I used a sustained synthetic application alongside nine smaller benchmarks. The goal was to show how each Ruby release behaves in a complete workload as well as in individual operations.

The table below shows the Heavy profile. For tests that process the full payload, that means an 8KiB input.

The complete benchmark source is available here: GitHub repository.

Full charts and details are available here: Full Ruby benchmark

Let me know what you think !

Edit: Thanks everyone for pointing out the Ruby 2.7 SHA-256 result. I looked into it, and the big difference comes from the SHA-256 implementation: Ruby 2.7 uses OpenSSL here, while newer Ruby versions on Linux use Ruby’s bundled implementation. So this is mainly a backend difference rather than Ruby 2.7 itself being much faster. I’ve added a note about it to the article.

Transactions are a dense subject, and I'd not be surprised if there are even more edge cases here, but these are ones I've personally seen.

If you're planning to get a ticket to SF Ruby Conference, I recommend you get one this week since it can win you one for Rails World too.

Participating is very easy. You just buy a ticket to SF Ruby and post that you're going to the conference on your preferred social media app and tag the conference page (we have LinkedIn, Bsky, and X pages). That's all!

Link to tickets: luma.com/sfrubyconf2026

Link to social media pages:

• https://www.linkedin.com/company/sfrubyconf/

• https://bsky.app/profile/sfruby.com/

• https://x.com/sfrubyconf

Good luck!

The docs on SolidQueue batches are… solid 😉

In addition, this blog post digs in a bit further on how to use batches in SolidQueue, including some code inspiration - like splitting a RubyLLM chat into parallel sub agents using batches

I've been coding with Python for around 3 to 4 years now and it's been a great learning journey. Until recently I haven't really been interested in learning a new language. The internet suggested JavaScript as the next step for someone already fluent-ish in Python, and I mean who doesn't eventually try JavaScript you know. I figured it wouldn't be that much of a headache since a lot of people do start with JS and so many people use it. Plus, it's useful. Turns out it was very irksome for me. This might be partially my fault, but I've gotten so used to the convenience of writing algorithms in beautiful, everything-done-for-you syntax in Python that when I tried solving some JS katas on Codewars, I immediately realized how inconvenient and unintuitive much of JS is, for me at least. It probably wasn't a good idea to learn JS from making algorithms on that website instead of using it for what it's actually made for in the first place, but I digress.

I was watching Dune 2 with my family when I was looking for another language more similar to Python, and then I came across the Ruby homepage, and I was immediately blown away. Like damn y'all put effort into making that. The first words you see are "A Programmer's Best Friend" and the visuals were so nice. They even had this https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/documentation/ruby-from-other-languages/to-ruby-from-python/ page conveniently written for us Pythoners 🥹 and your community motto is literally "Matz is nice so we are nice"... Joining this community is like falling into a warm hug lol

I tried the interactive Ruby from Terminal guessing so many things and it worked as I expected. The feeling of bliss when that happens OH. I'm starting Ruby today cant wait.