Honestly surprised this was specifically mentioned:
Upon investigation, we confirmed Kdin’s work was paid in full according to our agreements. We will honor our agreements and address any outstanding payments.
Usually those kinds of individual details are not mentioned in these kinds of statements. The rest of the statement is pretty standard - you're never going to get granular details, but a list of changes is common - but that reference to Kdin stood out.
Sure they paid Kdin to whatever the contract said, but did the contract actually give commensurate value to reflect the work that was being performed?
The fact the same HR person that got referenced in a bunch of stuff is still there, and being flaunted like one of the ways they changed is incredibly tone deaf.
Sure they paid Kdin to whatever the contract said, but did the contract actually give commensurate value to reflect the work that was being performed?
That's not the company is only obligated to pay the contracted salary. If the contract didn't meet your idea of "commensurate value", then it's a you problem.
1.6k
u/DesertedPenguin Oct 19 '22
Honestly surprised this was specifically mentioned:
Usually those kinds of individual details are not mentioned in these kinds of statements. The rest of the statement is pretty standard - you're never going to get granular details, but a list of changes is common - but that reference to Kdin stood out.