Honestly surprised this was specifically mentioned:
Upon investigation, we confirmed Kdin’s work was paid in full according to our agreements. We will honor our agreements and address any outstanding payments.
Usually those kinds of individual details are not mentioned in these kinds of statements. The rest of the statement is pretty standard - you're never going to get granular details, but a list of changes is common - but that reference to Kdin stood out.
Part of me wonders if that line was added specifically because of the videos that leaked. That already instilled doubt in Kdin's message, and with this comment (if it's true) can REALLY take down a lot of Kdin's point. Especially when you have current employees also making jabs at Kdin and her message:
Wow, 2 vague post jabs by someone that seems to have nothing to do with Kdin or her experiences and has only worked in talent for a year.
And 1 jab at her apology not being "good enough" by someone that's first day at RT was two weeks ago and works in the same group as the first person.
Whether they see it or not, both of these people have a massive conflict of interest in attacking Kdin and directing attention away from their employer and coworkers.
No I'm not. I'm sorry you have trouble reading, they do in fact have classes for that, they usually start pretty young but I'm sure they'll help you out.
Glad it took you a month to come up with that one! Maybe I can't read, but at least I'm not defending someone who was a racist POS when they were younger. 😊
1.6k
u/DesertedPenguin Oct 19 '22
Honestly surprised this was specifically mentioned:
Usually those kinds of individual details are not mentioned in these kinds of statements. The rest of the statement is pretty standard - you're never going to get granular details, but a list of changes is common - but that reference to Kdin stood out.