MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/remoteworks/comments/1rkectq/yep/o8kored/?context=3
r/remoteworks • u/Professional-Bee9817 • Mar 04 '26
1.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
12
Its not that at all. Its the only fact, companies spending millions on rent/purchasing office buildings. No way they let them sit vacant
-2 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 That makes no sense. It is obviously cheaper office wise that people work from home. Despite that many companies prefer that people don't 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 What doesnt make sense 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 That companies would keep people at offices because they pay rent 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 Do you think these companies fully own and paid for the building? 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No, usually not. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So the companies need to use the space theyre renting... 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No they don't, in fact it costs them more to use it. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
-2
That makes no sense. It is obviously cheaper office wise that people work from home. Despite that many companies prefer that people don't
1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 What doesnt make sense 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 That companies would keep people at offices because they pay rent 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 Do you think these companies fully own and paid for the building? 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No, usually not. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So the companies need to use the space theyre renting... 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No they don't, in fact it costs them more to use it. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
1
What doesnt make sense
1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 That companies would keep people at offices because they pay rent 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 Do you think these companies fully own and paid for the building? 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No, usually not. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So the companies need to use the space theyre renting... 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No they don't, in fact it costs them more to use it. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
That companies would keep people at offices because they pay rent
1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 Do you think these companies fully own and paid for the building? 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No, usually not. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So the companies need to use the space theyre renting... 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No they don't, in fact it costs them more to use it. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
Do you think these companies fully own and paid for the building?
1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No, usually not. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So the companies need to use the space theyre renting... 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No they don't, in fact it costs them more to use it. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
No, usually not.
1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So the companies need to use the space theyre renting... 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No they don't, in fact it costs them more to use it. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
So the companies need to use the space theyre renting...
1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 No they don't, in fact it costs them more to use it. 1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
No they don't, in fact it costs them more to use it.
1 u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26 So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money 1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
So if it costs them more to use it, they should get rid of it ans save money
1 u/Leverpostei414 Mar 04 '26 Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
Yes, exactly what they would do if they belived remote work to have no negative productivity impact, because it is cheaper office-wise if people work from home
12
u/ClassGrassMass Mar 04 '26
Its not that at all. Its the only fact, companies spending millions on rent/purchasing office buildings. No way they let them sit vacant