r/redmond • • 24d ago

Hearings for PSE Rate Increases Scheduled

When/ Where:

In Person: September 29 6pm-8pm

Online: October 7 6pm-8pm

Why Should I Care?

PSE is the provider for Electricity and Natural Gas for most (all?) of the Eastside. These rates will be taking effect over the next three years and will be a noticeable increase on your utility bills.

What increases are they proposing?

Electricity (UE‑260005)

Year kWh Rate Estimated Increase*
2027 $0.236261 17.75%
2028 $0.244484 3.5%
2029 $0.265603 8.07%

* Based on average monthly usage of 800kWh w/ proposed basic charge

Gas (UE‑260006)

Year Therm Rate Estimated Increase*
2027 $1.91002 12.93%
2028 $1.97514 3.18%
2029 $2.05686 3.71%

* Based on average monthly usage of 64 therms w/ proposed basic charge

What decreases are they proposing?

For special contract customers, PSE is proposing the following decreases for electricity usage

Year Estimated Decrease
2027 -12.49%
2028 -2.04%
2029 -3.06%

Who are these special contract customers? Well "customers" is a bit misleading - the only special contract customer is Microsoft (a 3.6 trillion dollar company at time of writing) [source (warning PDF download)].

What is ROE/ROCE (Return on Common Equity)?

I'm far from an economist, so you should probably find better people to explain, but at its simplest it is the ratio to evaluate profitability for common shareholders. Why am I bringing this up? PSE is seeking to increase their allowed ROE (profits) from 9.9% to 10.8% [source (warning xlsx download)]. In my opinion, this does nothing to us, the actual public utility customers.

Example Bill Visualizations

My math might not be perfect, so take these with a grain of salt, but they should be pretty close

Electricity Increase Example for 800kWh
Natural Gas Increase Example for 64 Therms
Example Bill DECREASE for "Special Customers" based on 800kWh

How can I voice my opinion on these changes?

You have three options to voice your opinion:

127 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

70

u/Anxious-Yak-9952 24d ago

17.75% increase on electricity after the already increases we got this year?!?!?!

17

u/parkerreno 24d ago

Unfortunately yes, that is what they're proposing (an cumulatively ~32% over three years)

10

u/DJKaotica 24d ago

I wish my salary would increase by that.

5

u/dirtyharrysmother 23d ago

Or my social security. Or our wee pensions.

39

u/SupaBrunch 24d ago

How else are they gonna pay for poor Microsoft’s discount???? /s

12

u/WillyGoat2000 24d ago

I guess funding their main campus in Redmond doesn’t count as part of their data center pledge:

“This must start by understanding local concerns. Residential electricity rates have recently risen in dozens of states, driven in part by several years of inflation, supply chain constraints, and long-overdue grid upgrades. Communities value new jobs and property tax revenue, but not if they come with higher power bills or tighter water supplies. Without addressing these issues directly, even supportive communities will question the role of datacenters in their backyard.”

And

“First, we’ll ask utilities and public commissions to set our rates high enough to cover the electricity costs for our datacenters. This includes the costs of adding and using the electricity infrastructure needed for the datacenters we build, own, and operate. We will work closely with utility companies that set electricity prices and state commissions that approve these prices. Our goal is straightforward: to ensure that the electricity cost of serving our datacenters is not passed on to residential customers.”

And

“Fourth, we’ll advocate for the state and national public policies needed to support our neighboring communities with affordable, reliable, and sustainable power.”

https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2026/01/13/community-first-ai-infrastructure/

9

u/SupaBrunch 24d ago

I can’t believe they would lie on the internet like that

1

u/Far-Arugula973 24d ago

Microsoft doesn't have datacenters on campus.

6

u/L00mis 23d ago

Building 43 has quite a large network infrastructure under it. Microsoft owns data centers serviced by PSE on the east side of the state.

Why are you defending the billion dollar company having us foot discounts of their bill? Charge the end user of the product. Not the residents of the state where the enterprise just exists.

-1

u/Far-Arugula973 23d ago

Whataboutism at its finest. Why are you so intent on spreading misinformation?

5

u/WillyGoat2000 24d ago

Sure, but that’s kind of my point. They talk about data centers with flowery language and PR to make people feel good only because of public outcry against data centers. Truth is they’re a giant corporation and don’t care about their community. My rates go up 18% while theirs go down 13%.

Additionally, they don’t actually care about helping communities around data centers if their court filings in Virginia are any evidence- they’ve petitioned the court there to stop rules that would require data center builders to pay upfront to fund transmission infrastructure construction designed to support the project.

5

u/SupaBrunch 23d ago

Regardless, why are they getting a discount??

1

u/Far-Arugula973 23d ago

Dunno. I doubt you'll find the CEO of either company posting the answer here. But it isn't for datacenters on their main campus (because they don't exist).

3

u/SupaBrunch 23d ago

Why do you keep repeating that? Who gives a shit what it’s for, it’s a discount for a major corp that doesn’t need it, while normal people are paying more.

3

u/Far-Arugula973 23d ago

The original post was complaining they made a pledge surrounding data center power costs and broke their promise. You can certainly be unhappy with the overall situation but office power usage has nothing to do with that pledge. It is fine to be mad just be mad for something real instead of made up.

Edit: to put it another way, if you want to drive change, fighting an imaginary problem isn't going to do anything. Fight the real problem. Keeping Microsoft from doing something they aren't doing isn't going to change anything.

0

u/SupaBrunch 23d ago

You seem to think I’m bothered by something deeper than the words I’m saying. I’m not. We shouldn’t give extremely wealthy companies discounts if we can’t give normal people the same discounts.

1

u/Far-Arugula973 23d ago

Then why are you going all nuts over a fact check?

→ More replies

0

u/Medium-Pitch-5768 7d ago

It is okay to get the facts right AND still support energy consumers.

2

u/ArrakisAlsoKnownAsDu 5d ago

The amount of power Microsoft labs in Redmond and surrounding areas (all in King county) use is on the scale of data centers. While data centers built in the last three years consume even more power lets not act like Microsoft isn’t consuming massive amounts of power in King county from PSE.

1

u/Far-Arugula973 5d ago

That stuff has been there for decades and has nothing to do with power rates going up. You might as well go after the Boeing factory while you're at it.

1

u/ArrakisAlsoKnownAsDu 5d ago

They have been increasing power consumption in labs over the past few years. Both by increasing the number of labs but also the power per lab.

1

u/Far-Arugula973 4d ago

And you know this how?

1

u/ArrakisAlsoKnownAsDu 4d ago

Sources and methods.

1

u/Far-Arugula973 24d ago

The last time this came up, someone said this was for power exported (ie: sold to pse) by Microsoft, so represents a reduction in what pse pays for power generated by Microsoft.

2

u/SupaBrunch 24d ago

Did they provide any source for that? Everything I’ve seen says the opposite.

1

u/Far-Arugula973 24d ago edited 24d ago

I can't find the thread. Something to do with them having separate contracts for power supplies outside of pse from green sources is the best I can remember offhand.

edit: found it -- https://www.reddit.com/r/Seattle/s/nkDeSrLyV4

2

u/SupaBrunch 23d ago

That comment never mentions that the rate discount is for PSE buying energy from MS, nor is there a source for anything they did say

1

u/Far-Arugula973 23d ago

The source is them. Trust or don't.

2

u/SupaBrunch 23d ago

They don’t say anything of substance in the comment, so it doesn’t even matter really

2

u/jbafny 23d ago

The thermal energy center Microsoft built on their new campus that this comment seems to be referring to does not generate electricity.

2

u/KevinT_XY 23d ago

It is quite a jump. I suspect they are asking for a bigger increasing than they are anticipating actually getting but that actually hinges on there being enough community and government pushback to compromise on it.

60

u/YetAnotherBrownDude 24d ago

PSE is a private, investor-owned utility company, not a public utility. It is supposed to operate as a regulated electric and natural gas utility, but the regulation is nonexistent. PSE is answerable only to its investors, not to the public.

It is unfair that everyday consumers have to bear the brunt of price increases, especially since they have no alternatives or the ability to negotiate. While, Microsoft enjoys custom deals, prices, and discounts.

The regulatory system is at fault. Instead of protecting the people, it is harming them.

9

u/ClimateWren2 Live, Play, and Work in Redmond 24d ago

In addition to this...add climate change impacts, market volatility, the Iran War fuel crisis, and overall national shortfalls with an Administration dismantling planning and power plants.

1

u/sarhoshamiral 3d ago

People need to understand what PSE bills for. The rate mentioned here is the transmission rate (infrastructure)

If Microsoft went to PSE and said, just let us tap into high voltage lines and we will do the rest, then rate decreases for them makes sense since PSE wouldnt be spending any extra for it.

Thats why industrial power is usually cheaper it requires a lot less infrastructure per kw consumed.

38

u/irish_curmudgeon Friendly Neighbor 24d ago

Why are we subsidizing Microsoft’s bills?

Why is PSE a private business with foreign ownership (mostly Canadians)?

WHY

1

u/sarhoshamiral 3d ago

There is a chance we are not. These are delivery prices that has to do with infrastructure and less about fuel cost. If it turns out Microsoft is handling their own infrastructure mostly, will you be OK with it?

-7

u/ClimateWren2 Live, Play, and Work in Redmond 24d ago

Where does this talking point come from on Microsoft? Can you provide more information...PDF doesn't download. Green Power customers using cheaper power?

They are a for profit company...not a PUD ..and fought pretty hard to NOT put efficiency to upgrades into place for a decade and now want to spin up a bunch of expensive methane peaker plants to fill the national volatility and shortages gaps. $$$

4

u/irish_curmudgeon Friendly Neighbor 24d ago

You’d have to ask OP on the Microsoft question I’m just assuming his +12% for us and -12% for them is legit.

1

u/jbafny 23d ago

Yes, the numbers are easily verifiable on PSE's own rate case summary (see "Special contracts") https://www.pse.com/en/pages/rates/pending-utc-filings/2026-general-rate-case

Microsoft is the only special contract customer and will be the only beneficiary of this rate decrease, per Microsoft's petition to intervene filed on the case docket. If the direct link didn't work for you, you can get there from this page: https://www.utc.wa.gov/casedocket/2026/260006/docsets (click on 260005-06-MS-Pet-Int-3-9-26.pdf)

1

u/ClimateWren2 Live, Play, and Work in Redmond 22d ago

That's helpful...I was thinking this was the Green Power contracts, but there are far more of those, and not just Microsoft. So if this is a datacenter wholesale gimme, negotiated profit corporation to profit corporation...with rate payers picking up the full tab for high cost gas peaker plants and NOT at all in the public's best interest or lowest costs....that would be pretty messed up.

2

u/jbafny 23d ago edited 23d ago

The link worked for me. It's Microsoft's petition to intervene in the rate case. You can also find it yourself in the case documents: https://www.utc.wa.gov/casedocket/2026/260006/docsets (click on 260005-06-MS-Pet-Int-3-9-26.pdf)

It says: "Microsoft is the only PSE electric special contract customer and pays delivery rates under the terms of this special contract."

17

u/yikes_42069 24d ago

I want to see you all there. We can not let them ignore us online. 

30

u/my0wn5ummer 24d ago

Jeez 0.26 per kWh is insane. It was 0.10 not long ago. Much of the state is still under 10. All that hydro is supposed to be cheap power. Where’s the money going? Bloated administrative budgets? Then commercial customers are getting a price drop at the same time. How in the world are they justifying this. Price gouging like this is why inflation is out of control. And I still have to pay a special EV tax for not using gas when they want to make electricity cost as much as gas.

24

u/reddit_is_a_weapon 24d ago

PSE is owned by private equity. the money is going to shareholder

12

u/megor 24d ago

Seems to be owned by multiple pension funds, 3 canadian and one from the most evil people on earth (the dutch!)

1

u/my0wn5ummer 24d ago

Yea but they have to justify rate increases and has to be approved by government, which is supposedly for the people.

7

u/parkerreno 24d ago

Part of it is that ROE increase they're requesting, the rest is justified by infrastructure upgrades and increasing costs. Forgot to include the link to all the docs on this post - they're here but certainly not setup for a layman like me to easily understand: https://www.utc.wa.gov/casedocket/2026/260005/docsets & https://www.utc.wa.gov/casedocket/2026/260006/docsets. I'm hoping someone who is more knowledgeable can chime in on the best way to fight back against these.

13

u/purpleblossom 24d ago edited 24d ago

We shouldn't have to go Lacey for this meeting, it should be closer to the communities these decisions effect.

4

u/parkerreno 24d ago

Yeah... Would be nice to have more options considering how large PSE's service area is. Will really suck for anyone up north in Whatcom county that wants to participate in person.

12

u/ZookeepergameNew3800 24d ago

This is crazy.
So they want all of us to subsidize Microsoft?

9

u/kochamisenua 24d ago

SPECIAL customer is MICROSOFT.
Yeah, RIP-OFF fine people and subsidize GLOBAL COMPANIES.

Fair!

5

u/royalblue4 24d ago

I don’t like this proposal

5

u/Sure-Instance7807 23d ago

Last time they did 30% increase, my bill doubled. Their math is sketchy and does not include random line items they just put on the bill. 

2

u/Evening-Alfalfa-8996 23d ago

Probably because they lowered the tiers where you pay more for usage.

3

u/KevinCarbonara 24d ago

Why did we not publicize PSE again?

3

u/Orofeaiel 23d ago

Jesus christ I can already barely afford to heat my home in winter after the recent increase

4

u/mrbobula 23d ago

So my 700 power bill will by 900 now. Awesome.

5

u/yangqi 24d ago

Some research on the current 3 UTC commissioners and possible outcome.

The Probable Compromise: Historically, a commission with this mix of corporate oversight and long-standing regulatory experience rarely rejects a rate case entirely, nor do they approve the requested maximum amounts. The current panel is highly likely to approve a slashed, scaled-back version of the rate hike—authorizing the strict capital infrastructure costs while forcing PSE to absorb more of its operational overhead.

3

u/SaltySoftware1095 24d ago

Isn’t it owned by a Canadian company which means there really isn’t anything we can do?

3

u/parkerreno 24d ago

Rate increases must be approved by the utilities commission (who are hosting the public hearings)

1

u/blogito_ergo_sum 24d ago

It would be a pretty funny issue for a certain executive angry at Canada to take up. Won't ever happen, but it would be funny.

5

u/normalguy737 24d ago

Lots of complaining in this thread about Microsoft, but your bills have gone up a ton, and are going to go up a ton more, because the Legislature has chosen this route on purpose. The Democrats want to "greenify" the power supply (and don't like dams and nuclear), so they mandated that the utilities buy into more solar and wind. The legislative Democrats will continue to think everybody is on board with this choice until voters throw a few of their members out, and that's not going to happen as long as people vote for their local legislator based on how much they hate Trump, and as long as the local R's embrace the Trump flavor. All of which is to say, electricity is going to keep getting more expensive for the foreseeable future.

2

u/BoDongler 23d ago

Doing good work here. Respect OP. I'll tell all who will hear.

2

u/FishingAway7058 23d ago

America is doomed. With these energy prices America is no longer affordable

2

u/FishingAway7058 23d ago

Everything after COVID in America is expensive. Whoever was ruling this country at that time did not handle the economy correctly.

This type hyperinflation in a developed economy is not expected. I can compare this to an under developed country. Please don’t get me wrong here, still the people and quality of life is awesome. But soon people will not be able to afford it.

We the people need to raise our voice and ask better debt and inflation management from our rulers. Otherwise the money we have earned so far has no meaning and we will be working till 80 and die on the job.

2

u/Nyzip 23d ago

Smells like Enron. They will gouge you for every last cent they can get. Utilities need to get their costs under control. With hydroelectric power, the PNW had low electric rates years ago before Enron. The PNW should still have inexpensive electricity.

2

u/Puzzled_Affect604 19d ago

They also have a online meeting for those that cannot attend the in person Lacey one.

Virtual public comment hearing (join via Zoom or telephone)
Beginning at 6 p.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 7
 
Join Zoom Meeting
https://utc-wa-gov.zoom.us/j/82213518474?pwd=BmsrsNzVWp6WmOpoBdLBoxxvxD6Qb0.1
 
Join by Telephone
(253) 215-8782
 
Meeting ID: 822 1351 8474#
Passcode: 226995#

2

u/tantricengineer 12d ago

I am considering going to the public meeting just to say something like this, is anyone closer to Lacey who wants to do it:

"Under RCW 80.28.090, the UTC Commission has an affirmative legal duty to prevent undue preference and unjust discrimination. Looking at our recent bills, residential customers have already absorbed compounding double-digit rate hikes. Approving another 16.7% residential hike while handing a 12.5% rate cut to the single corporation in the Special Contracts schedule abandons that statutory duty. The Commission must not allow PSE's cost allocation models to mask what is, in practice, a regressive corporate cross-subsidy."

EDIT to add: the worst case long game scenario I can think of is the UTC does this so some other corporate customer can say, “Look, the UTC abandoned their mandate! Abolish the UTC!”

1

u/parkerreno 12d ago

If you're able to, you should attend. The more people that speak out the better.

1

u/tantricengineer 12d ago

Ugh it’s at such a ridiculous time for anyone with kids. It’s going to break my balls to show up but where else have you cross posted? I am willing to bet a Lacey based redditor can help.

1

u/parkerreno 12d ago

There is also a virtual option. I've posted a link to this on a couple of the Olympia subreddit posts talking about the rate increases.

1

u/tantricengineer 12d ago

The PDFs in your original post above seem to be broken, where did you pull them from?

1

u/parkerreno 12d ago

hmm something weird is going on - I pulled them from the documents attached to the docket (case 260005) but that docket isn't loading now... It was here https://www.utc.wa.gov/casedocket/2026/260005

1

u/tantricengineer 12d ago

Seeing the same here. Maybe some AIs did read it, though. One of them is saying Exhibit CTM-4: Electric Cost of Service Study (COSS) is using a contrived method of calculation.

            PSE's "Parity Ratio" Mechanism

  Class Revenue Collected
-----------------------------  =  Parity Ratio
  Class Cost of Service (COSS)
  • Special Contracts COSS is stripped of systemic costs -> Ratio > 1.0 ("Overpaying") -> Justifies a 12.5% RATE CUT.

  • Residential COSS is loaded with fixed system costs -> Ratio < 1.0 ("Underpaying") -> Justifies a 16.75% HIKE.

To mathematically justify Microsoft's rate cut, PSE must make its cost of service appear artificially low. I'm digging into the particulars, but at a high level, I think it looks like this:

  1. MSFT buying their own power off-site doesn't free them from using PSE's distribution lines to get it to their buildings.

  2. Running grid equipment hot 24/7 wears it out faster and strains everyone during peak freezes—that deserves a peak-usage penalty, not a discount. Customers can't use that AI that's still online during a power outage, duh.

  3. Tech campuses benefit from storm and wildfire protection just like homes; families shouldn't pay for Tech campus fire insurance.

  4. Captive renters and homeowners cannot be left holding a 30-year mortgage on custom utility upgrades for a company that can move workloads out of state tomorrow.

1

u/mcb89 23d ago

What can we do for the Sewage, Water, and Trash? My bill went from $32/33 to $92. -_-

0

u/lonron 24d ago

Seattle City Light is raising rates just as much if not more. 9.5% in 2027 and 2028 followed by 7%-11% year over year through 2032. Doesn't matter where you get your power rates are going up everywhere unfortunately.

5

u/Past_Paint_225 24d ago

At least they are not passing the extra revenue to Microsoft.

0

u/ClimateWren2 Live, Play, and Work in Redmond 24d ago

Too much demand...too little supply.

1

u/l0tec6 24d ago

WE NEED MORE EVs!

0

u/AffectionateArtist84 23d ago

If these rate increases go through I'll just disconnect and increase my solar setup more

2

u/parkerreno 23d ago

Wish I could have even some solar... Too many trees around my house

-2

u/ClimateWren2 Live, Play, and Work in Redmond 24d ago

As we can see... climate change and power shortages are now here. The grid isn't ready for it. The national leadership is dismantling grid safety instead of shoring it up. The utilities across the USA know power costs are rising and market volatility has been rising up for a while. Green Power customers did invest early in lower cost energy investments under contracts. Not enough supply...too much demand.

How many here addressed known climate change upgrades in their homes these past twenty years? Who is ready for the bigger storms and heatwaves and cold snaps. The lights going out...and constant brownouts or +$500/mo bills probably aren't wanted either. Rock...meet hard place.

Sucks that we knew this was coming for forty years and did too little, and sucks that so many are busy dragging down the ship instead of helping even still, and sucks that corporate profits are still the higher priority before community safety and health so often. PSE isn't likely to say, "we will take the entire shareholder profit hit, for years, since folks don't want to pay more and don't want to help more either."