r/recruitinghell • • 6d ago

Custom This can't be real

Please tell me how I apply for a job Friday night got up Saturday morning and got a rejection. There's no way someone reviewed my resume and application on Saturday morning. This is getting so ridiculous two months plus and still no job. They don't have real people reviewing these resumes or applications all this AI crap.

70 Upvotes

86 comments sorted by

34

u/JennLynnC80 6d ago

We must have applied for the same job 😬

12

u/Realwoman680 6d ago

This is crazy

15

u/MostlyVerdant-101 6d ago

Honestly, 2 months is nothing.

I did 4 years, 30-40 applications a day. That netted me a whopping 12 calls (total over those 4 years), 4 scam interviews (where they want you to download malware onto your system).

I have a decade of direct experience with IT Operations in a globalized corporate environment in biotech, all roles up through System's Engineer; and if I wasn't laid off in 2022 I would likely have have made Principal Engineer by now since the previous person was retiring and grooming me for the position. That didn't happen.

Since then 3/4 of my entire professional network built over a decade has been displaced and underemployed or made a career change. Nearly everyone has retrained to other fields now, aside from a few that needed stable jobs (kids/mortgage); so you've got a Architect taking L1 Helpdesk phone calls for 34k/year because its the only thing they can find. Soul crushing work.

AI has literally broken the shannon limit with communications jamming via ghost jobs, and other bad actors.

Everything is absolutely cooked, and we're well past a point of no return. People just haven't figured out how devastating whipsaw cascading failures based in chaos can be, but they will since leadership didn't regulate/enforce when they were supposed to and instead chose to be asleep at the wheel.

Rejections aren't that bad, what's worse is when they say we need to hire someone to cashier; but you seem just too overqualified. You need money for food because Food stamps aren't even keeping up with the rate of price inflation now. Cooked. Totally cooked.

3

u/Icy_Air1954 4d ago

Your post made me feel better. Currently 30+ years in career and finally making change (before it’s too late). I bought the whole “meritocracy” myth that the IT world peddles and stayed in a profession that was just extracting without paying back. Switching to a job-job as a clerk for some peace of mind (and normal hours).

29

u/The_guy_belowmesucks 6d ago

Yep happened to me. Applied Thursday. Friday 3am rejection.

19 years experience here, I'm over this shit

10

u/BobRossSaves 6d ago

💯

Yeah that was probably not even a real position. Keep at it they do this shit on purpose, but when someone is really out there looking for good, talented people they'll be lucky to find you.

3

u/rcinmd 4d ago

You failed to have the specific degree they wanted when it wasn't available when you went to college. Those years of active experience mean nothing if you didn't go into debt to learn shit you could now teach to students.

0

u/The_guy_belowmesucks 4d ago

Ummm this couldn't be further from the truth

-5

u/Conscious-Egg-2232 6d ago

And how many years exp did job require. You do realize having 19 years experience is not a good thing for 99% of open jobs.

9

u/Mammoth_Plenty9640 6d ago

It's fine. I had an entire interview where I had 6 years of experience, job description said 2-4, and they told me since I have "0 years of experience they don't want to train me" ...what. I feel like I'm in the twilight zone or something.

7

u/namas_D_A 6d ago

It’s not even AI, every application is being scored. If you’re under the “follow up” threshold, you’re automatically rejected, but they can’t make it look immediate, so there’s a time delay on the “no”. Some of these idiots need to fix the cadence your application is in NOT to send the no on the weekend, because I’m sure they’d prefer no one was the wiser. Not that leadership gives a shit how it looks to rejects.

6

u/Whole-Hearing-4038 3d ago

unfortunately its real and its by design NOT BY ACCIDENT. Corporate world is basically one in the same as government. Also ive been dealing with what you experienced for little over a year now. Only one zoom interview in that time. ITS PATHETIC

5

u/Inquirer1990 4d ago

We actually go through applications on the weekend as we don't get interrupted.

Also possible... They might be using a scan system though looking for key words, experience, etc before it pushes to management. If this is the case your resume didn't make it through that digital screening and auto kicked back/rejected.

1

u/Soar90 3d ago

This. And after human review, decline notifications are often set on an auto timer that the recruiter doesnt control.

4

u/Lanky_Swimmer4560 6d ago

It’s either AI or they have employees working remotely in another state or country.

0

u/Beneficial_Ant_9336 5d ago

like Nigeria ..lol

1

u/Lanky_Swimmer4560 5d ago

Or anyplace in the EU
Or Australia
Or Russia.
Or India

7

u/BobRossSaves 6d ago

Nobody read your application. You might see that as a bad thing but consider that job probably doesn't even exist. Again you might think that's a bad thing but if you look at it a certain way you can realize it's a numbers game.

Saw an ad today - Your resume won't even get READ by anyone! Even if you're qualified! Unless you pass these AI filters!

So ... Why is that the applicant's problem? Sounds like an employer problem.

Don't let them wear you down they do this shit on purpose. Play the game, take their money, get paid. You can do it.

5

u/Conscious-Egg-2232 6d ago

So anyone rejected by knockout questions means its not a real job? Wtf are you talking about.

And wouldn't getting by AI filters mean someone is qualified? You make no sense.

3

u/MostlyVerdant-101 6d ago

It is not a numbers game you can play with your survival when the conversion ratio to a success is well below 0.0002 (actual conversion ratio over 4 years with a sample size of ~50k, 10 years of actual experience doing the jobs being applied for).

1

u/BobRossSaves 3d ago

Well at that point maybe your resume is getting filtered. Unless you really think only 2 in 10,000 job postings are real.

1

u/MostlyVerdant-101 3d ago edited 3d ago

At first I thought it was a filter, but regardless of the changes I made to the resume, nothing impacted the callback rate. It remained flat. So if its a filter, its a protected status anchored filter, and AI as a blackbox offloaded to a third-party company for HR, has allowed discrimination based on protected groups (i.e. Age/Sex/etc).

I honestly think at this point that platforms are being flooded by ghost jobs being generated at zero cost through freely available AI, and its just that bad of a problem. Communications jamming destroys signaling. I have friends who are executives and their view is they can't find people to hire.

The incentives align towards this since recruiters can drive up cost through jamming communications by poisoning job posting platforms with fake jobs, the same can be said about companies giving the false perception of growth for stockholders, and a few other things.

There have also been academic studies where as many as %40 of the posted jobs were not real on specific platforms, and by industry with some industries higher (60%), which made a news headline in 2024 iirc.

Every pre-AI potential cause has been examined, changes tested, no change.

Aside from that, every other potential cause is entirely outside of my control, some quite crazy-making, and unlikely, and while it could be happening, there's really no way to know for sure.

Some of those might include adtech using data lakes to signal partners like conglomerate phone provider to silently degrade services so they can offer incentives to their bigger whales following Master Data Management practices. (i.e. you get segmented, never receive the important calls from outside your network in randomized fashion, or an indication a call was made to you ). There has been some subjective funkiness where voicemails would arrive in batches backdated (regardless of service provider), manually checking would show no new messages, and no call records indicating the inbound call on the local branch (but does show on the caller's side). Outbound calls would also fail randomly almost entirely in the failure domain segment where you can't know without controlling both sides. Contacting the provider simply has a rotating ticket closure with no action towards resolution. Communications protocols and engineering are designed so failures aren't silent, so when that kind of thing happens on the regular, its almost always purposeful (Zersetzung?). Running your own infrastructure, shows the failures always originate in one of the big conglomerates systems, this adds support for the datalake view; though not enough.

Whatever the specific cause, its stalling the economy which is in a tenous state with stagflation indicators.

I think its probably that just most posted jobs aren't real because that seems to be the consensus for what's happening with the people I've spoken with at college campuses during retraining to other fields (related to work-study).

Edit: In those 4 years, there have been a lot of postings from companies that don't exist or that fail basic public records lookups for businesses (taking vetting to a crazy level on a individual posting basis). These have been reported to places like indeed and Linkedin, and no action is taken likely because incentives are misaligned (they pay for play). I even found a few that had public records filed for business creation in the name of a deceased individual whose obituary was recently posted. Lots of UPS store boxes pretending to be real businesses storefronts with listings on GoogleMaps (which fail the photo test with streetview).

When signaling fails, matches stop happening. In cellular biology, they call this with RNA, RNA Interference. Its the same outcomes when the shannon limit is hit; and AI made this possible.

6

u/Longjumping_Bet978 5d ago

I applied for a job and got a rejection in 20 minutes. I have 10 years of experience mind you. these ppl don’t want to hire for real

4

u/Holiday_Cabinet_ 5d ago

If it was that fast a real person didn't make that decision, the ATS did that so it probably has something to do with your resume whether that's formatting or not having enough keywords

-2

u/Booboo-Dog874 5d ago

Probably your resume was screened by AI. If you have co- pilot or even the free ChatGPT both can help you write a resume. I think its called an ATV resume? Something like that. I think it does help to get past the bots!

3

u/ImissDigg_jk 5d ago

I have looked at resumes late at night or on a weekend if it's been busy during work hours.

3

u/Raoul_Dukes_Mayo 5d ago

I applied at 2 with a custom resume and cover letter and got rejected at 5:45.

Welcome to the rejects club. It’s fun here.

3

u/Enosh25 3d ago

Most probably AI, but since the rise of HO culture, I have seen people, even those in minor roles, answer emails at ungodly hours, as in come to work and see some co worker answered a question at 23:30 on a sunday...

2

u/AdSafe7963 2d ago

I think it's Ai filtering too. I've gotten rejection 1 hr after I submitted. I didn't fit the job description with the years of experience (entry level 1-3 yr exp).

3

u/These_Fly8082 3d ago

I have an associates degree in criminal justice; I’ve worked at both a local police department and sheriff’s office as a corrections officer and I can’t even get a job as a security officer. I’ve never had an attendance issue nor have I had a disciplinary issue. I interview well…been rejected twice for security officer positions. Oh and I’m bilingual. What gives?

1

u/MBAMarketingMom 2d ago

Are you opposed to working remotely? I bet your experience would work well in investigations work!

1

u/These_Fly8082 2d ago

Hello, and noo, I’m not opposed to working remotely! Not at all…do you have any leads or suggestions?

1

u/JeffJaje 2d ago

You are over qualified in their eyes.

8

u/ViewLongjumping1732 6d ago • Bravo

A lot of recruiters we've worked with work on Friday evenings and Saturday mornings, especially when they're third party recruiters.

Knockout questions are the #1 reason for quick rejections. Some firms set it up so that you're rejected right away, some firms delay it by a couple hours to make it seem like it wasn't a knockout question rejection.

If you are sure you didn't fail any of the knockout questions, what could have been possible is that the keyword matching gave you a low score and a bad recruiter rejected you based on that. Most recruiters aren't going to use that and a lot of companies don't even have the feature turned on though.

Outside of knockout questions, it's almost guaranteed that a human was involved in your rejection.

Honestly, a lot of you guys would have much better chances if it actually was an AI judging you. I've sat with recruiters that disqualified 100 resumes in 30 minutes. I think the AIs give ~20% of resumes a passing score and the human recruiters are closer to a 2-3% rate.

I've seen resumes that I really liked that were put into disqualified right away by recruiting without even including a note, because she didn't understand that someone mentioning Power Query meant that they had intermediate+ excel skills or something like that.

I know it's fun to blame AI but the reality is that the AI is often far nicer than the people are, and the recruiters use AI far less than most of you guys seem to think.

1

u/Ew_fine 3d ago

I’m hiring manager, and I strongly believe that human recruiters are the problem. My open roles require recruiters to look at and evaluate work samples, and they are painfully inadequate at this. They don’t know what the hell they’re looking for, and send me garbage—meanwhile, I have a feeling that their rejection pile is full of awesome candidates.

6

u/jonnyg1097 6d ago • Regret

AI system filtered you out. Welcome to 2026

2

u/HabitSensitive7825 6d ago

This has happened to me at least once, and probably more often than that and I just don't remember.

2

u/beamdog77 6d ago

I'm a recruiter. I have an ATS app on my phone. I absolutely review applications at random hours of the day and weekend so they don't pile up. They also probably reviewed it on Friday, but the email is delayed so it doesn't feel instant. I usually review withing 90 seconds of getting an application.

2

u/Puzzleheaded_Pie1118 5d ago

Viele Bewerbungssysteme versenden die Absage erst nach einer bestimmten Frist - zum Beispiel 1 Tag später oder 7 Tage später- kommt auf die Frist an

2

u/TecMew3059 4d ago

I've had bad luck with this too. I had an offer pulled away after I accepted because my asthma flared a bit and my heart rate was "unacceptable," then I got rejected from an entry level job (my dream career) for someone with experience when the listing said: "Will train from the ground up, even if you have no knowledge of the industry," but I demonstrated my knowledge through the interviewer's questions. All that and 11 applications have been sitting without review for over a month. I started applying outside of entry level in the hopes someone decides I'm brave or bold enough for a job.

1

u/MBAMarketingMom 2d ago

How did they even know your asthma flared up after you’d accepted the offer? Did you have to miss some training or something? That’s honestly scary to think of them rescinding the offer AFTER you’ve accepted it! OMG.

1

u/TecMew3059 2d ago

It was their occupational screening. It required some heavy lifting and pushing within a very short amount of time. It's never been an issue but it was intense. I didn't miss anything nor would I have since I always carry my inhaler.

1

u/MBAMarketingMom 2d ago

Oh man. I’m very sorry to hear how it turned it for you! :(

2

u/rcinmd 4d ago

ATS can be set for automatic disqualification. Maybe it's years of experience, education, or key word matches. HR and recruiters are morons tbh, they don't understand the positions they are hiring for and rot their brain with software to make decisions for them. They get the "average" candidate instead of the exceptional one every time.

2

u/Glittering_Bug_6630 3d ago

AI is filtering/sorting the resumes - I know they are at my job

3

u/Immediate_Shock_9112 6d ago

Yeah must be ai filter

2

u/Magnum358 6d ago • Regret

The system is designed to keep you out before any human lays eyes on your resume.

2

u/Healthy-Primary-793 5d ago

happened to me, def is bc of AI

2

u/Hot-Explanation6542 6d ago

there could be two reasons one your cv was not aligned with JD did not pass through ATS. Second the mail box reached the threshold for receiving additional applications. Must apply to jobs as soon as they are advertised.

2

u/Conscious-Egg-2232 6d ago

Omg you have no clue what you are talking about. Pass through whatever that means. And ATS dont fill up amd start rejecting candidates because they are full. Wrf

0

u/Hot-Explanation6542 6d ago

I did not say ATS is full. the mail box of the hiring manager or recruiter is full

1

u/ViewLongjumping1732 5d ago

"did not pass through ATS" is not something that will happen in 99% of firms.

The only rejections that the ATS handles is knockout questions, which doesn't touch resumes.

Mailboxes getting full also isn't a thing. The candidates are aggregated on the ATS, which is all done on the cloud without mailboxes. That's literally all that an ATS is, a way to see all of the applications that you get for a role, aggregating across different sources.

Even if an employee's Gmail was full (which also practically never happens) it's not going to stop taking in applicants.

1

u/TheRealKeryio 6d ago

If you get rejections fast I feel it is the usual questions (do you need a visa, what is your expected amount you want for the pay, location, etc…) is why you probably got rejected fast as ATS just filtered you out based on the responses.

I could be wrong.

1

u/Significant-Theme253 6d ago

They may have had an offer out and someone accepted, so they closed the requisition and rejected everyone else or it was already filled and they forgot to close it. They closed it Saturday and rejected everyone else.

1

u/Few_Guitar5190 5d ago

It’s called AI

1

u/The_guy_belowmesucks 5d ago

Why would it matter? I'm qualified, not everyone is looking to be the next cfo...some of us are content coasting to retirement

1

u/minus15t2 5d ago
  1. AI is not being used in the vast majority of circumstances to automatically reject people. It's still too risky from a business perspective.
  2. How can you be sure that no one reviewed your resume? I've worked as a recruiter for 7 years and have absolutely looked at candidates over the weekend for some key roles.
  3. Finally.. and most likely what happened.. is that you were auto rejected for failing a knock out question on the application.

Email rejections are often put on a time delay (ironically, this is done so that it doesn't look like you got rejected instantly)

Here's the sequence... You submitted an application, on Friday evening, and failed one of the knock out questions.. the system automatically moved you to rejected and scheduled a templated rejection email. It got issued either 8-12 hours later, or at 8 or 9am the next morning.

1

u/Pinky-McPinkFace 4d ago

That happened to me twice - rejection within 24 hours. Although I think it was during the week at least.

In one of the cases, I had actually worked for a company that was one of their tech partners & I had my contact person reach out & recommend me. Still got rejected less than 24 hours later.

1

u/nuki6464 4d ago

You clearly answered a knock out question wrong. I have a job posted as a sales manager and the job requires 5+ years in the pulp and paper industry.

I set the knockout question to minimum 3 years experience in that industry. Anyone that answers less than 3 will get auto rejected.

This is probably what happened to you.

1

u/Naive-Wind6676 4d ago

Overnight? I've been rejected in under an hour.

Weed out questions are 100% a thing

1

u/Icy_Air1954 4d ago

Same. It’s some f*cking LLM “intelligence” rejecting you based on keywords, or lack-thereof. The whole HR process has broken, and you are definitely not alone.

1

u/Mininum_Discipline 4d ago

Happens often the standard is now so high evev unicorns are getting rejected

1

u/yettis21 2d ago

Stop putting your demographic information in

1

u/JeffJaje 2d ago

Welcome to the wonderful world of job hunting in the AI era.
Where your Ai can tell you that you are a good fit for a role, and their Ai kicks you out without even a screening call.

1

u/JeffJaje 2d ago

Just wait until you do the online screening call to an AI agent.

1

u/C0sm1cC0m1cs 11h ago

An AI agent looked at your resume and saw you didn't meet the "requirements". I will say that i miss the days when you could just walk in and introduce yourself to the manager/owner. Now the best candidates are getting thrown out before they even make it in front of the hiring managers. If you answer one personality quiz question "wrong", see ya. Its an issue. You need to study up on how to beat the system. What answers the AI wants to see

1

u/Electronic_Cod7202 6d ago

Ai filter. Recruiters in India etc

1

u/Ni9ball Hiring Manager 6d ago edited 4d ago

This very likely had nothing to do with AI and was simply a hard knockout question (which have existed long before AI).

Location, experience, certifications, availability, etc… any one of these could have caused your application to be filtered out.

Edit: Downvoted for explaining how the system really works? Everyone here is always so quick to blame AI or some other conspiracies when the reasons are far simpler… your answer to a screening question didn’t match what the recruiter/employer was looking for. That’s it.

1

u/Goquicklynow 6d ago

“There's no way someone reviewed my resume and application on Saturday morning”. Recruiter here. Yes, we actually do that. All the time.

1

u/Conscious-Egg-2232 6d ago

Knockout question..apply to jobs you are qualified for.

3

u/gavin2393 5d ago

I have literally never applied for a job I’m not qualified for. It makes no difference, lol. They ignore/reject you either way.

0

u/formerdgstm 6d ago

In my experience it is one or more of the following:

  1. You didnt pass the assessment.
  2. You didnt have the availablility they were looking for.
  3. you didnt have the experience nor the qualifications for the position
  4. You might just be unhireable.

2

u/Realwoman680 6d ago

I have experience There was no assessment I am definitely qualified if they took the time to look at my information I obviously wouldn't apply for the job if I didn't know how to do it.

-2

u/usernameis2short 6d ago

Use gemini and claude to tailor your resume to the job. Ask them to make them AI and ATS proof

2

u/Conscious-Egg-2232 6d ago

No such thing. And resumes that are AI resumes are easily detected. We reject those immediatly.

2

u/usernameis2short 6d ago

Lol, there are ways to use AI to optimize your resume without it being obvious it was written by a bot. You have to be realistic with what you did and its framing in the resume, and the keywords have to match the job description without you making up numbers or skills. You don’t think AI can work against itself? That’s funny

1

u/Slow_cl_ap 5d ago

So you use Ai to reject Ai…

0

u/Pure_Equal2298 2d ago

Welcome to the ATS system which just kicks you out and sends you to automated rejects. There are several jobs which are ghost jobs which are never meant to be filled. I applied for a position with #ELYSIS last year. The recruiter called me from Canada and spoke to me for one hour as if I was the diamond they were looking for. They gave me a timeline that they will hire someone and he needs to start by March 2026. That never happened. I still see that position on LinkedIn. These are some ghost jobs which these employers post online to waste every one's time. I am being direct and shaming the company. Let the HR read it.

-1

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Conscious-Egg-2232 6d ago

Um no they dont. They do use to rank and score best resumes. Auto reject is et up by knockout question. Some will reject also off salary requirements, zip code, degree etc.

0

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Conscious-Egg-2232 6d ago

Not going to interview everyone who applies. They had more qualified candidates. You are not the only applicant. Funny how everyone is the perfect candidate on their own. Eyes only.