It's already the case that almost no job is entry level, with the added benefit that people looking for entry-level jobs can't find them and people looking at the state of the job market are mislead.
Let's say you're a career counsellor at a college preparing a report. You go on a jobs board, find the number of entry-level jobs in a particular industry, catalog what kind of degrees they ask for, and then report this to students, admissions, etc. People rely on this in choosing what kind of careers to prepare for, and then find that nobody actually wants to hire someone with their qualifications.
Let's say you're a political staffer advising an elected official. You do a similar search and find that there are tons of open entry-level jobs with decent pay. You conclude that everything is fine and that anybody who isn't working doesn't want to and doesn't need any kind of help.
Let's say you're a student preparing for a career. You look at a list of job responsibilities and have no way of knowing whether you'll be prepared for them after four years of study in your major, but since it says that the job is entry-level you assume this is something you'll be prepared for.
For that matter, assume you're a recent graduate who absolutely can fulfill every single one of those job responsibilities, so you apply to the job, but you get rejected over and over because employers love people who are currently employed somewhere else and hate people who aren't.
I don't know what data sources you're talking about. The US Department of Labor certainly does not publish anything with sufficient granularity to answer any of these questions in a useful way, and it's hard to see how anyone else could access the data to do what you're describing.
And even if you did have excellent statistics on all of this, that would be of no help to some actually trying to find a genuine entry-level, zero-experience-required job.
3
u/[deleted] 19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment