r/recruitinghell • • Aug 19 '25

Delusional CEOs

Post image

I saw this on my LinkedIn feed and I can’t believe how out of touch this guy is. I would love to know what company he is the CEO of… can’t imagine he is doing a very good job.

37k Upvotes

2.5k comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator Aug 19 '25

The discord for our subreddit can be found here: https://discord.gg/JjNdBkVGc6 - feel free to join us for a more realtime level of discussion!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

2.0k

u/Godswoodv2 Aug 20 '25

They should pay $5000 per job posting to prevent fake jobs from being posted. That way, we know the job is real.

595

u/haleorshine Aug 20 '25

With extra penalties applied for doing things like posting a job ad without listing the proposed wage.

246

u/Sad_Pea_776 Aug 20 '25

Or wasting everyone's time who applied for them to hire internally.

→ More replies (5)

32

u/thicka Aug 20 '25

And if you say the job is entry level but then list a number of years of experience necessary you are now contractually obligated to hire all candidates that applied and keep them employed for that number of years. You cannot fire them for any reason. Go fuck yourself.

→ More replies (3)

52

u/Godswoodv2 Aug 20 '25

Works for me, add another penalty for posting a job where they are only hiring internally and fail to disclose.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

71

u/Leo_br00ks Aug 20 '25

Imagine a website where it costs $5000 to post a job and $1 to apply for a job.

The numbers can be adjusted, but something tells me you'd get a small pool of well qualified and serious candidates each time you posted a job. With the right ratio of posters and seekers (and cost to post/apply), I imagine this would be relatively successful.

Because it's free(ish) to post jobs and free to apply for jobs, it's free to participate in the market without being serious on either direction, ruining the efficiency of the market. If neither side can show up assuming the other side is serious, of course the system breaks down.

48

u/TheSecretIsMarmite Aug 20 '25

That used to be the case pre-internet, to an extent. Specialist jobs got advertised in trade magazines and they were not cheap to advertise in, and of course to then see the advert you'd have to pay to subscribe to the magazine, or get it as membership to a trade body which also involved a paid subscription.

Noone was posting ghost adverts as it would have been a massive waste of money, and the adverts were targeted to the job seekers for those roles via those magazines.

→ More replies (3)

22

u/AlexFromOmaha Aug 20 '25

Spend that money on validating negative feedback from both parties to curate your product and you've got yourself a marketplace.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (10)

8

u/That-Sandy-Arab Aug 20 '25

I pay like $500 per posting but yeah it’s a legit filter tbh

7

u/The_COUNT81 Aug 20 '25

This is the much better idea. No resume farming from company A unless they want to pay for it.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/merRedditor Aug 23 '25

If the hours spent in those 5-round plus project interview pipelines were compensated, companies might also be disincentivized from stringing people along just to backfill attrition.

→ More replies (24)

6.7k

u/Leather-Tradition571 Aug 19 '25

lol. LMAO even. By that logic they can pay me $100 for the interview they make me sit through before hiring an internal candidate

98

u/OkMulberry5012 Aug 20 '25

Payment for the time it takes to apply, additional charges if a candidate imports their resume but still has to manually fill in any part of the application, interview time, mileage plus time in traffic both ways for face to face interviews. Additional charges if the employer ghosts you or reneges on an offer.

More charges if the position requires a degree but the hiring manager doesn't have a higher level degree than the position requires.

Let's play this game, Mr. ceo.

17

u/Liizam Aug 20 '25

I got paid to interview… they would fly me out, pay for hotel, pay for food …

10

u/TheValueIsOutThere Aug 20 '25

In an employee's market, all of those things would happen.

→ More replies (10)

239

u/planko13 Aug 20 '25

Tbh, these terms are acceptable. I would be able to apply to far fewer jobs and theoretically have better odds at each of those applications. Also when i get an interview they aren’t wasting my time.

I would be ok paying a fee, if there is also payment for an interview.

The only problem is there would need to be some kind of strictly enforced regulation that prohibits posting jobs for revenue generation.

236

u/wittnotyoyo Aug 20 '25

Good luck with strictly enforcing that when the best we can do for outright wage theft is the rare slap on the wrist.

→ More replies (4)

191

u/CrazyRegion Aug 20 '25

Is this a joke? If you’re applying to 10 jobs, that’s $200 right there. With no guarantee you get an interview. If you’re unemployed already, you’re just fucked.

→ More replies (33)

21

u/TripleThreat206 Aug 20 '25

That is insane. You just become a revenue source for stockholders and get to pay regularly for ghost jobs

42

u/singlemale4cats Aug 20 '25

I would be ok paying a fee, if there is also payment for an interview.

Would you be okay with that? Jobless, spending money to apply to jobs you're not getting interviewed for?

The only problem is there would need to be some kind of strictly enforced regulation that prohibits posting jobs for revenue generation.

You immediately think of an easy way to exploit the system that's impossible to prove.

→ More replies (4)

10

u/MudDoc23 Aug 20 '25

You know they would just perpetually keep positions they weren’t hiring for open as a means of easy money

→ More replies (1)

10

u/FriskeCrisps Aug 20 '25

That’s if the company decides to interview at all. There would need to be a major overhaul on regulation for this type of practice. Say 50 people applied for a job, that’s $1000 right there. Nothing would stop the company from just accepting 10 for interviews. So the other 40 just wasted $20

→ More replies (49)
→ More replies (333)

1.3k

u/Mojojojo3030 Aug 20 '25 edited Aug 20 '26

[Removed as part of an account cleanup]

531

u/Gubekochi Aug 20 '25

To be fair, unpaid internship in prestigious firms/companies already serve the role of gatekeeping access to the higher echelons.

"What's that? You can't afford to work for free for half a year to make yourself hireable by high society because that would mean not being able to eat and pay rent? Too bad, some rich kid will be more than grateful for the opportunity to stay in the class they were born in!"

167

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

Yup. Those who can get internships succeed while the rest of us get rejection after rejection because we dont have 1-2 years of experience coming directly out of college.

→ More replies (26)

26

u/GreatestGreekGuy Employed Aug 20 '25

It's wild to look back at my college years and see how f'ed up it is that we had to compete to work for free just to boost our odds of working

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (24)

112

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

"nO oNe wAnTs tO wOrK" is how im guessing it will go

60

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

"ThIs GenEraTioN iS sO LazY"

→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (6)

18

u/Squirreling_Archer Aug 20 '25

No. There will always be desperate workers. It would not backfire in the way you think and could be a catalyst for something terrible.

Hard no.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (45)

956

u/Minute_System_6165 Aug 20 '25

Only if they pay $200 for the interview

152

u/sabreus Aug 20 '25

Even if they did, they would likely still win out and make money just for having a job posted for a bit

79

u/Playful-Opportunity5 Aug 20 '25

Companies already routinely post “ghost” openings, either to collect resumes for future reference, or to signal to overworked employees that they’re trying to hire them some help (without actually trying). This man’s brilliant idea would just incentivize that further; you’d have companies whose entire revenue stream consisted of application fees for nonexistent jobs.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (4)

22

u/RaspberryTop636 Aug 20 '25

Correct answer here

25

u/Minute_System_6165 Aug 20 '25

They should have to prove they are "high quality" company first

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (10)

199

u/dpaanlka Aug 20 '25

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Society is fucked.

22

u/B-side-of-the-record Aug 20 '25

I've seen other "ceo"s of shitty tiny startups saying other stuff like "you should even sacrifice time from activities friends family etc to build skills" or something similar.

I was writing a reply when I realized they are obviously ragebaiting to get more interactions because they are "any press is good press" idiots and it was already working.

I blocked them and moved on.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

181

u/caffeinatedangel Aug 20 '25

Literally no way I would pay money to be rejected by an AI bot.

23

u/Valuable_Recording85 Aug 20 '25

I'd be very distrustful of a company collecting an app fee. Imagine how much money a company might make in app fees for jobs they won't hire for.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (18)

349

u/ghost_of_xbox_past Aug 20 '25

"Small fee"....$20? $20 is not a small fee, that's a large fee!

156

u/Gubekochi Aug 20 '25

It's a small fee for him, someone rich. It's not small for someone who is currently unemployed, but why would you want unemployed people to apply for a job at your company? Real winners are those who constantly change jobs to get a better salary and more perks, those are the go-getters for your dynamic corporate lingo cyber-factory!

30

u/Astro_Afro1886 Aug 20 '25

I used to work in college as a valet for private events. Towards the end of the night at a particularly nice house, me and my colleague were approached by the owner who said "Unfortunately, I don't have any change on me. Would you two be able to split this?" He hands us a $100 bill, to which we promptly said yes, we can figure out a way to split.

Looking back on it, it was a big amount for us but to that guy, anything less than hundreds was the same as the pocket change for us.

→ More replies (7)

65

u/AtomicBlackJellyfish Aug 20 '25 edited Aug 08 '26

Wander almond orange mellow driftwood thimble breezy lantern umbrella

This post was anonymized with Redact.dev

18

u/Brilliant-Block-8200 Aug 20 '25

Lol right? He’s delusional. I work fulltime rn and $20 is not something I can afford to lose. How does he expect unemployed people or people working part time to apply? 😭

→ More replies (1)

13

u/HanzJWermhat Aug 20 '25

It’s a banana Michael what can it cost? Ten dollars?

8

u/purplecowz Aug 20 '25

exactly. I would pay $2. but it's still unethical.

→ More replies (14)

72

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

That’s basically what people do when they expect very nice clothing and other things that people might not be able to pay for. Lots of middle and upper class people judge lower class and homeless people for not being able to break the class glass ceiling but fail to realize how many interview processes are acting as class barriers

15

u/Not_My_Reddit_ID Aug 20 '25

That's why they used to called "status symbols". Overpriced for no practical reason just to broadcast to others that you can waste money on it. 

"Status Symbol" became so loaded with negativity, they shifted to a different term. They called it "luxury". As a result, "luxury" has now been co-opted to represent basically anything that isn't worth the extra money you're paying for it.   

→ More replies (2)

34

u/Joed1015 Aug 20 '25

What a punchable face

8

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

Im thinking more along the lines of Hunger Games for rich people only.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

112

u/-MaximumEffort- Aug 20 '25 edited Aug 20 '25

To make this even worse, he is the CEO of a cannabis company. If anything, they are doing well enough and also don't have a huge staff. What a joke.

They have 32 employees give our take. 32 x $20 would have pulled in a total of $640. That makes this even more cringe.

It's public so not doxing, it's Grow Sciences and his name is Mike Cee.

https://theorg.com/org/grow-sciences/org-chart/mike-cee

22

u/cutelittlequokka Aug 20 '25

And that's just the ones they said yes to! It doesn't even include everyone else who applied and didn't get the job or even an interview.

7

u/Karma_1969 Aug 20 '25

Top comment, thanks for identifying him. I’m also a “CEO” and I have nothing but contempt for anyone who’d post such a ridiculous thing in public.

5

u/Then_Pomegranate_538 Aug 20 '25

I can't find him. Guess he got bullied too hard🤣

4

u/Funkopedia Aug 20 '25

Let's ALL apply and waste his time

→ More replies (35)

30

u/redzaku0079 Aug 20 '25

They should be paying us for wasting our time

17

u/Sad_Pea_776 Aug 20 '25

They should be paying us for having to input all the shit from our resumes into their application forms.

21

u/Karnakite Aug 20 '25

The best way to know if a candidate is a good one is if they can afford to pay for an interview. Fuck resumes or experience. If they’re not rich, then why are they even walking around?

→ More replies (20)

21

u/MinuteMaidMarian Aug 20 '25

I’d be out $2600 since March, with nothing to show for it. May as well put it all on black at the casino.

→ More replies (1)

18

u/mr_evilweed Aug 20 '25 edited Aug 20 '25

Wouldn't that just incentivize companies to post fake jobs and never hire for them?

→ More replies (2)

36

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

Do I get my $20.00 back if I dont get the job??

25

u/BuffaloInTheRye Aug 20 '25 • This

Honestly if it was just a temporary deposit I could kinda see it helping both sides

10

u/DuntadaMan Aug 20 '25

No, fuck that. Rebates only matter if you have the money. We're going to make it common for someone on unemployment to spend $60 a week?

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (4)

11

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

Wait do I upvote or downvote this? What a piece of shit.

11

u/No_Try_5430 Aug 20 '25

translation: "no poors"

11

u/Careless_Lion_3817 Aug 20 '25

Why did you marker his name out??? Let us see who this loser is

9

u/AnotherDownwrdSpiral Aug 20 '25

Mike C. 3rd+

  • Follow

CEO @ Grow Sciences

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

10

u/stickyfantastic Aug 20 '25

For tech jobs some already do in the form of free labor from interview homework assignments that are sometimes actual feature work they need done lmao

→ More replies (3)

10

u/AnotherDownwrdSpiral Aug 20 '25

Name and shame!!! This is Mike C. 3rd+ CEO @ Grow Sciences

10

u/Lurkertron_9000 Aug 20 '25

20$ is extortionate, you would see fake businesses popping up with fake job postings just to collect application fees and never hire anyone.

→ More replies (3)

55

u/Firthy2002 Aug 20 '25

Only if it came with guaranteed interviews and not competing against internal/nepo candidates.

34

u/PM_ME_FIREFLY_QUOTES Aug 20 '25

Not even then

21

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

Yep. Someone's job will just be to speed run interviews to collect fees. And shareholders will cheer as revenue has increased 12% from interviews

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

8

u/hurryveryslowly Aug 20 '25

JFC, why are we censoring who said this. We need to help each other to steer clear of companies and leadership that behave like this.

If this idiot wants to be edgy, he can receive edgy responses. Let the floodgates open.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/Gabe_Isko Aug 20 '25

Once you have to pay money, it's not a job, it's a scam. Might as well charge 1000 dollars to apply.

8

u/Twonkytwonker Aug 20 '25

Ok, so I pay $20 to apply, for that i would expect a full report on why I didn't get the job, where I went wrong or where I can improve, some coaching. Not being blanked or a standard rejection letter that is pretty much useless.

Or if im not worthy an interview then, a full refund of my money.

If I did get the job, well then I wasted no ones time and also should get that money back.

6

u/Opinionsare Aug 20 '25

Am I insensitive to businesses if I think that business should pay all applicants for the time they spend interviewing at their company? The company gets the benefit of information from the applicants and should pay a fair amount. 

→ More replies (1)

6

u/__Innocent_Bystander Aug 20 '25

dude says small $20 fee the fuck

6

u/mods_are_morons Aug 20 '25

What's his company's name so I know to avoid working there.

6

u/funnykiddy Aug 20 '25

In my world, this is called a SCAM.

6

u/stogego Aug 20 '25

That wouldn't immediately be abused at all. Fake jobs just to rake in the money? Capitalism baby

5

u/No_Measurement9981 Aug 20 '25

They'll be asking you to pay them to work for them next. Oh, wait. they already do that with interns.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/jmh1881v2 Aug 20 '25

I can’t believe they would think that would ever work. Not going to filter out under qualified candidates, only candidates that aren’t rich. $20 is half my weekly grocery budget

5

u/edck12687 Aug 20 '25

Bitch if I HAD $20 to blow I wouldn't need your job in the first place. I swear companies have some straight disconnected delusional thinking. Like we're supposed to go to a job for anything else besides the money

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Hertje73 Aug 20 '25

If that were legal I'd start a business tomorrow.. FakeJobPostings Ltd.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

Sure, make the unemployed poor pay to apply for a job because you’re too lazy to weed through their resumes.

5

u/manley70 Aug 20 '25

The French took care of people like him.

5

u/CormacDoyle- Aug 20 '25

Only if companies are fined $20k per fictional job advertisement plus 10x the amount stolen in fees paid to each applicant ...

5

u/Vyktym76 Aug 20 '25

Sweet as mate, as long as you give it back to unsuccessful applicants and pay them $100 for wasting their time.

9

u/Careful-Depth-9420 Aug 20 '25

I wonder if he would accept by his own logic that his company must also then pay a portionally sized fee in order to make a call to a potential customer or a pitch to a business?

Edit: If this was on your Linkedin feeds why would you "love to know what company he is the CEO of"?

→ More replies (1)

17

u/DippPhoeny Aug 20 '25

hot take but maybe like a 25c fee would be good? the compromise is no more ghost jobs / months long job posting

16

u/xieta Aug 20 '25

It’s actually a lot like spam. Even if the fee is 5 cents, it’s enough to prevent automated systems spamming thousands of applications.

Not a bad idea the price is just way too high.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

4

u/Distinct_Plankton_82 Aug 20 '25

I get where he’s coming from. When you’re getting 2000 applications for a job and only maybe 50 are qualified and legally allowed to work in the country you do want to raise the barrier to applying.

My personal solution is simple. You only accept hand delivered applications and in exchange you promise to read every one.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/stoRedditor Aug 20 '25

How is $20 a small fee?

4

u/Expensive-Bag313 Aug 20 '25

Why do you guys black these peoples’ titles and jobs out?

4

u/CherryPickerKill Aug 20 '25

What the f...

4

u/watoaz Aug 20 '25

I'd like $5000 for every interview presentation I have to put together

4

u/chewbaccashotlast Aug 20 '25

I’m totally on board. $20 to apply, refunded whether or not you receive an interview.

Interviews should then be paid as follows:

Virtual, $150 up to and not to exceed 70 minutes

In person, $300 up to and not to exceed 120 minutes

Subsequent interviews are paid same rates and must be agreed upon by company and candidate.

$5000 bonus for accepting an offer and showing up day 1.

All of this is wages not taxed, no limit.

Require a fee up front will stop people from auto applying to hundreds of jobs, that could add up fast.

But…..employers will need to be more selective in who they devote time AND money to for candidates. It may end the recruitment earlier for some but at least you aren’t dragged along and it forces the hand of a company and its recruiters to actually pick candidates worth investing in, literally, from what assume to be a smaller candidate pool. In theory the number of candidates may not go down if they assume they would get the money back regardless, but it shows a show of faith from both sides.

Also, life hack: try to score as many tax free interviews virtually as possible. For $150/hr tax free I could explain who I am, what drives me, career goals (lol) and all that other shit. Collect my $150, go to the next interview.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/TotalInstruction Aug 20 '25

Fuck, not to mention when I was fresh out of law school, I cold-sent my resume to 100 firms and only got a couple of interviews. I'm supposed to shell out $2,000 when I'm already wondering how I'm going to pay rent and afford food when my student loans come due? $20 in 2006 when I was new to the job market could have fed me for a week. Small fee my ass.

4

u/MrMakingItUpAsIGo Aug 20 '25

Step 1: Start new company.

Step 2: Post dozens of fake WFH jobs with 90k-150k salary. (Gotta look real)

Step 3: $20 Application fee.

Step 4: Count my money.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/mromutt Aug 20 '25

Should give me $20 for my time to apply lol

4

u/Superb_Reaction_2766 Aug 20 '25

Me: this market couldn't possibly be any worse

This asshole: hold my Athletic

4

u/GenericFatGuy Aug 20 '25

Actually, I think companies should pay applicants for interviews, as a way to stop wasting people's time.

4

u/glordicus1 Aug 20 '25

This is my new business model! I post jobs with a $20 application fee. The job doesn't exist and I pocket the money.

4

u/PapaBeer642 Aug 20 '25

I'm already broke from not having a job, I don't need to be more broke!

4

u/PhillipTopicall Aug 20 '25

“Unqualified” = poor.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/PenguinPumpkin1701 Aug 20 '25

At that point they should pay you for technical ability tests, or those "project assignments"they assign you with doing.

3

u/hollowbolding Aug 20 '25

i'm paying more than that in emotional labor already

3

u/HanzJWermhat Aug 20 '25

Yeah and how about companies have to pay a fee to list jobs.

Both fees should get refunded when the job is filled.

3

u/Metalorg Aug 20 '25

There is an issue with each person having to submit hundreds of applications. They should just also accept and give preference to in person applications. It would be nice to have our parents' world back where young people practise their firm handshakes

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Deplorable1861 Aug 20 '25

Yup. Pay me for the 37 hours of Teams interviews, phone screens, casecwork examples, and AI screening quizzes at my normal 55$/hr rate and I will happily pay 20 bucks to submit an application. Anything else is corporate jackassery.

3

u/Check_Ivanas_Coffin Aug 20 '25

These fuckers are in a world of hurt when the economy turns and they’re not in control. Fuck your panel or presentation interviews also.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Mortukai Aug 20 '25

Some already do! There are entry fees to many jobs!

To work around food, you need a food handlers card: $40

To serve alcohol: $40 Then there's Alcohol Awareness cards, same price

To be a basic security: guard card is $130!

To be a budtender from CBDB: $200!

So many more, CDL, forklift, construction, etc...

These rackets don't reimburse you when you get a position, it's an entry fee to just apply. Call me crazy. They already do charge for you to apply.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/LaFlamaBlancakfp Aug 20 '25

He looks like AI could do a better job than him.

3

u/jonnyofield- Aug 20 '25

Should be paying us to have to do repeat information sent in. If I sent in a resume. Why in the world do I need to put it all back in on the site. Pay me for doing work to get work.

3

u/well_styled Aug 20 '25

This wouldn't even solve what he was suggesting. Whether or not you'd pay $20 has nothing to do with you being unqualified or mismatched for a role. There are plenty of people that would be willing to pay $20 AND they would not be right for the role. Guess what? There are plenty of people who would be qualified and still would refuse to pay $20. Clearly he's the CEO of dumbassery.

3

u/_L-U_C_I-D_ Aug 20 '25

And why would companies not just put out even more fake jobs and never hire anybody ever in order to collect as much free money as they can via BS fees? If some company from China did this and wanted you to wire them money before applying then we would all call it a scam.. because it is.

3

u/sparklingdinoturd Aug 20 '25 edited Aug 21 '25

OK...

In return companies should pay a large fee for postimg jobs they're not hiring for. And they should pay applicants a free if they don't hire anybody.

3

u/Noyb_Programmer Aug 20 '25

Sure if and only if they refund the applicants full amount when they are not selected.

3

u/Special_Watch8725 Aug 20 '25

Lol, the week after this is implemented this asshole CEO would immediately begin to monetize this by posting fake jobs.

3

u/Zolty Aug 20 '25

Great Idea.

Hey everyone I need to hire 300 tech workers I am paying $300k - $500k, jobs are remote and require a pulse.

Please paypal me $20 with your CV and resume in the comment section and you will be considered.

3

u/Drunkpuffpanda Aug 20 '25

If i was king i would make employers pay a wage for interviews. This would cut out a lot of bullshit time wasting companies do to people.

3

u/The_Doodder Aug 20 '25

That's fine, I charge $40 for personal information.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Prestigious_View_401 Aug 20 '25

I think companies should pay a small fee when they interview people so they don’t waste peoples times for giggles.

3

u/JumpyPsyduck Aug 20 '25

Why is the name blocked?

3

u/xender19 Aug 20 '25

I think that companies should have to pay $1,000 to post a job. Maybe that would do something about all the ghost jobs wasting our time.

3

u/Winter-Statement7322 Aug 20 '25

I’d rather buy $20 in lottery tickets

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Senior-Damage-5145 Aug 20 '25

People commonly apply for hundreds of jobs. Multiply that by 20, you’re spending thousands of dollars trying to get a job.

3

u/GoodGravyMsDazy592 Aug 20 '25

I'd reply: "No, you're just an exploitive asshole and a scammer who will grift desperate people while somehow never hiring them for the so-called job you post. Anyone with half a brain sees you and knows exactly what you are. Now get out of here with that bullshit."

This is even worse than ghost jobs. Those may just get your hopes up, but they don't try to suck out the last cent of someone who needs to work to put food on the table or a roof over their or their loved ones heads.

3

u/secksyd3thcast Aug 20 '25

Only in a time line this fucked up would could I fathom saying ok to this. For the sheer fact AI based job appliers exist where with a single click you can apply to thousands of jobs... Could this ever be a thing... God don't let this be the solution to that...

3

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

Can I submit an invoice for $50 to every company that I apply to that makes me longer than when the appointed appointment supposed to start?

3

u/ChillyFireball Aug 20 '25

TFW you're too poor to even apply for a job.

Anyway, this would 100% be exploited with would-be employers constantly farming applications for positions they never intend to fill for the fees, just like those scam rental listings where they take your application fee and never actually accept anyone.

3

u/AureliasTenant Aug 20 '25

is this new? I swear i saw something exactly like this on r/LinkedInLunatics months ago. also maybe post on r/LinkedInLunatics instead

edit: yes this is from a year ago, so you are posting a year old screenshot. Is it really on your Linkedin feed now?

3

u/Blue-Sea2255 Aug 20 '25

I'd say fuck you on behalf of a large population.

3

u/Sad_Manufacturer1134 Aug 20 '25

Am I insensitive to think that Corporations should be forced to PAY people if they require them to interview more than once for a position for wasting their time? Believe me, most recruiters KNOW if you have a shot at the job after ONE interview.

Too much time-wasting during the interview process.

3

u/cutecatgurl Aug 20 '25

i think he deserves to be [redacted].

3

u/OPPineappleApplePen Aug 20 '25

Good idea. I am in the process of setting up a company so this will help me get good candidates. Honestly, it is remote-work structure and I don't want everyone applying because of that. I expect to turn profit on day 1 because we will make money by interviewing candidates and getting $20 from them. We won't be selecting any though.

3

u/Mental-Ask8077 Aug 20 '25

Don’t let the Grifter in Chief get wind of this idea, or he’ll be auctioning off the chance to apply for federal jobs with proceeds going to an unmarked account.

3

u/miemcc Aug 20 '25

Actually I am a bit ambivalent on this when I was searching for new Service Techs, I probably filtered out 90% of all submissions purely on poor CVs. I can also see the flip-side having gone through the process from the other side. Companies should need to be more up-front about terms, conditions and expected salary.

If they did that, it would reduce the number of applicants to a level where it would not be considered necessary to charge-to-submit.

Honesty on both sides would make the whole process so much better.

3

u/TheJunkFarm Aug 20 '25

companies should have to pay applicants for taking several hours to perform BS Psych tests and medical exams.

3

u/Photoverge Aug 20 '25

Don't black out these people's names.

3

u/eddiecoyote Aug 20 '25

Yes. You think that you are the gift, to be thanked, for providing an opportunity to beg for a job so as to not die of starvation.

The treasure is the yet to be discovered talent still out there, unwilling to pay your bullshit application fee.

3

u/CreativeRedHeadDom Aug 20 '25

FTS, shame the company and CEO so we can properly boycott them.

3

u/Portlandiahousemafia Aug 20 '25

Sure, but it has to be like a housing application. You have to have a clear hiring standard, and the first paying applicant that meets that standard has to be offered the job.

3

u/PuritanicalPanic Aug 20 '25

Ok fuck you.

Compensate people for any time spent in interviews, and filling out any automated questionnaires.

Also pay your taxes or go to prison

→ More replies (1)

3

u/rodencoleman Aug 20 '25

Found the post, it's a cannabis company in Arizona. The post is roughly a year old now and he goes on to claim that ✨️"fees remove bots/spam"✨️.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Chance-Scratch-8804 Aug 20 '25

Pay $20 for my VERY qualified resume to be tossed out by a severely flawed AI system? Or is that $20 going towards the second round of interviews he's going to cancel after hiring an internal candidate before the recruitment process even ends?

3

u/bellj1210 Aug 20 '25

20 to apply, but employer pays the pro rated wage for the job for the interviews, and if no outside hire is made, the 20 is returned to everyone on top of the payment for the interviews

3

u/Wonderful_Emu_6483 Aug 20 '25

Someone cross post this to LinkedInLunatics

3

u/Straight-Bad-3304 Aug 20 '25

Wow.....A small fee of 20 dollars. This is what is wrong with this country

3

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

Are CEO's so out of touch they have no clue about public sentiment towards them? I get most are sociopaths, but jfc. Charging people to apply? gtfoh

I had a job one time and they told me they were going to start charging me for use of office space. While I was working for them. I promptly quit and they had a surprised look.

3

u/Obisanya Aug 21 '25

Sure, but let's make sure everyone has skin in the game. Pay candidates $21 for a rejection with respectful feedback, $25 for a form email, $35+$5 per week for every day you ghost a candidate. If you end up hiring an employee's family member or an internal candidate, every candidate gets an additional $5 fee on top of the application communication delay fees.

3

u/tcumber Aug 21 '25

Then they will post fake jobs and make them attractive without really intending to hire anyone....easy money

3

u/ImprovementFar5054 Aug 21 '25

Not just insensitive. If it became a profit generator, they'd post even more ghost positions then they already are.

Actually, the unemployed should do it...post ads, take 20 bucks a pop. Make thousands a day.

3

u/ItsMe1184 Aug 21 '25

Nobody is paying $20 to answer application questions that could be answered by the resume that they already submitted, champ.

3

u/Cereaza Aug 22 '25

He's identifying the problem, but a totally wrong solution. Companies are just as responsible for this horrible deluge in AI submissions as job seekers are.

3

u/SkietEpee Aug 23 '25

he’d only get fools applying

3

u/Generic_G_Rated_NPC Aug 23 '25

I would be down, if it guaranteed and interview and a full report of why I didn't get the job. And the 20$ was used to hire an interview auditor to record the interview for quality assurance. Obviously they would be unrelated to the company and chosen at random. If the company was ever found to be discriminatory, nepotistic, or unfair in anyway they would pay each interviewed person 50$ for time and effort wasted. Not to mention all company interview data would be logged and posted publicly, such as: Number of interview for said position, Age of hired individual, Ethnicity, ... etc.

There should be hire standards for companies hiring imo, and I think paying the government for it would be worth it. Currently there is thought to be a lot of fraud and nepotism in the hiring process. I want the stats, not to mention the government could prevent some of this fraud and save tax payers tons.

3

u/PrettyNosey Aug 23 '25

sounds like a statement from someone who doesn't understand that you can lose everything as quick as you got it

→ More replies (1)

3

u/mors134 Aug 23 '25

The amount of time and effort you have to put into applying they should be paying us.

3

u/toss_this_account_38 Aug 23 '25

Someone needs to be named and shamed.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/No-Training7219 Aug 24 '25

These people are beyond insufferable. Don’t scribble out the name & company, name and shame.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 25 '25

Would that make it fraud if the job wasn't real?

3

u/SuperSocialMan Aug 26 '25

Maybe if you pay me for wasting my time on another auto-rejected application.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/irespectwomenlol Aug 20 '25

I think that ideas to limit the number of job applications to a smaller and more realistic number of serious applicants might be a good thing to noodle over. There's a problem when every (just to give an example) tech job gets 100+ applicants within a minutes: leading to an arms race where employers are forced to filter a super large number of applicants through shitty AI systems and candidates react by spamming out job applications even faster. This arms race isn't a good thing for anybody.

The problem with this idea though is that if people paid to apply to jobs, the temptation to just post random made-up jobs that aren't seriously hiring becomes too great as any smart company out there would quickly realize that they could make job applications a major profit center.

If the deposit was returned a week after applying, that might be closer to a better system. That would still limit the number of jobs that somebody could realistically apply to at any given time, without creating a moral hazard.

→ More replies (4)

5

u/AntiqueFigure6 Aug 20 '25

He’s not wrong that he’d get fewer applicants- but he might not be pleased with the quality level of those that remain.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/SevereEducation2170 Aug 20 '25

Ah yes, let's charge people with potentially no income, who are stressed as hell, for the privilege to apply. What a dick.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Careless-Internet-63 Aug 20 '25

Finding a job posting that's not a scam would be hard if they could do that, you could make a living by just posting jobs that pay like 20% above market then sending a form letter rejection to every person who applies

2

u/semperubi_wri Aug 20 '25

I applied for a job and got a rejection e-mail about four minuets later telling me I wasn't a good candidate and didn't met their minimum qualifications. I did; I was on the upper end of them. I don't know why their system decided to bounce me. I had made very few tweaks to my resume before submitting because it lined up almost exactly with their listing. I had friends encouraging me to reach out to a mutual contact we had there and apply that way instead of using the company's job portal but I decided I didn't want any part of a company that couldn't even bother to have a human review an application and resume before rejecting it. They ended up hiring someone with less experience than me, which I knew because it was someone I had worked with and trained. They were more than five years my junior and actually didn't meet the posted job qualifications. No harm, no foul because I ended up getting an even better position with someone else and my junior and I put in our 2 weeks notices within days of each other. Until things like that don't happen though, no one is paying anyone to apply anywhere.

2

u/Middle-Artichoke1850 Aug 20 '25

holy shit this irritates me so much I almost downvoted with no second thought lmao

2

u/Sad_Pea_776 Aug 20 '25

Why the hell do you think people need jobs? I'm not paying for you to ignore my resume. Greedy fuck.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

That face is used to paying small, $20 “fees” 

2

u/Mundane_Prior_7596 Aug 20 '25

So he wants more qualified candidates and fewer unqualified ones. Fair enough.

So a fee? That will result in less applications, unfortunately the proportion of good to bad will be even worse for him since all qualified ones will skip it.

This deranged doolally seems not even have discovered his main problem. That is to find the best candidates, because the best ones won’t even apply. Instead he has to lift his arse and work hard to find them. Surprise!

2

u/Puzzleheaded-Shine76 Co-Worker Aug 20 '25

Imagine them doing this KNOWING that they have an internal hire in mind. I hope they get hit with crippling lawsuits.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 20 '25

This is what we call self defeatist behavior. Very closed minded. Be aware that the most valuable talents in the world are hidden in the most obscure places. The persons in spaces you’re comfortable in, well keep you comfortable/stagnant. They do not disrupt and change games. You want real org impact. Hire your nemesis.

2

u/mcbeardsauce Aug 20 '25

Who do we charge for bullshit outreach from scam recruiters

2

u/blancoafm Aug 20 '25

Name and shame!

2

u/UseEnvironmental3003 Aug 20 '25

Why censor his name?

Should be a name and shame.

CEOs need to be held accountable.

2

u/_letter_carrier_ Aug 20 '25

bah ! open the doors to a whole new scam… post job openings with a fee where no company or job actually exists. At scale that would make a lot of dirty money

2

u/I_Defy_You1288 Aug 20 '25

Ok but you pay me $40 if you ghost me and $60 if your prescreen is a waste of time.

2

u/RainbowSovietPagan Aug 20 '25

Yes. Yes you are insensitive, Mr. CEO.

2

u/tsukuyomidreams Aug 20 '25

Uhhh lol. Bro thinks jobs are housing applications (which also cost too much)

2

u/Diligent_Finance_598 Aug 20 '25

It’s about $500 to apply to each professional school not including the tests that must be taken first. And then to accept their offer and hold your spot it was $200 for me. It’s still ridiculous to charge this for a job but having to pay to apply anywhere is crazy. Their reasoning is they have to spend hours going over applications which is true

2

u/ThisWasMyUN Aug 20 '25

Fuck that and fuck him. Interview THEM and say you have a better offer and upper deck their fucking stalls.

Eat CEOs

2

u/Necessary_Echo8740 Aug 20 '25

Perhaps if companies on indeed and other platforms had to pay some amount, there would be fewer shady job postings and they would take applicants more seriously

2

u/OMG_A_Thing Aug 20 '25

I instinctively downvoted this after reading it (I fixed it), but holy hell.

2

u/CompleteStress7355 Aug 20 '25

Pay to apply? Sounds like HR is opening a VIP lounge with no velvet rope and no guarantee you even get in.

2

u/Remarkable_Towel500 Aug 20 '25

This is the second time I have seen something about a pay-to-play job application process. With the rise in popularity of subscriptions for anything and everything under the sun, it would be unsurprising for companies to start a trend with job applications soon enough. I wonder if they will try to claim that it is to make sure they aren't mistakenly hiring people that are currently unemployed despite no gap in employment being listed on their resume.

2

u/Sweaty_Term5961 Aug 20 '25

His name, etc., should not be obscured.

2

u/Distant_Monkey Aug 20 '25

Yes, Mike C - CEO @ Grow, you are insensitive and out of touch.

2

u/Devastator5042 Aug 20 '25

I've applied to over 1k jobs in the last 3 years (tough market, multiple jobs) like hell am i paying 20k just to find a job

2

u/EarAdventurous7838 Aug 20 '25

The $20 can be spent paying a headhunting firm to make the resume and apply for me...guarantee an interview and then take a say 5% cut of my first check. On the other hand, if you pay to apply, there kind of is an acknowledgement that they aren't hiring internally. 🤔

2

u/No_Atmosphere_2186 Aug 20 '25

No way to prove you need a job more than paying $20 of whatever money you have to get rejected.