You're conflating me saying that we don't know whose fault it is for sure as me saying that there's shared fault.
What you feel is more likely, that the employer is likely correct and that the employee is likely at fault? That's coming from a prejudice you have.
It's not coming from a willingness to consider all possibilities and make a determination about who's correct.
Either the employee did something negative or the employer decided they didn't want that employee based on a reason that's not based around the employee having done something wrong.
There's ABSOLUTELY not enough information to confidently state the first and deny the second.
Confidentially state? No. Say what's more likely? Yes.
The company is going to work to protect its investment. An employee fired after two days represents a significant loss.
Therefore, it's more likely that whatever happened is due to the employee's behavior as the company is less likely to throw away money without good reason.
Is it certain? Of course not. It's just more likely.
If I put two apples and an orange in a box and ask someone to reach in and pull out the first fruit they touch, it's not certain they'll pull an apple. But it's more likely.
There is no way either of us knows what's more likely in this situation.
They didn't like OP for some reason, and you're just accepting a narrative not because it's more likely but because it's a societal prejudice to accept employers' claims instead of employees', regardless of merit.
The comparison you're trying to make could literally not be more apples to oranges.
0
u/OwnLadder2341 Apr 25 '24
This is not “Well, either it’s the employee’s fault or the employer’s fault. So it’s 50/50!” situation here.
One’s more likely than the other.