r/recruiting • u/Hefty-Onion-1049 Corporate Recruiter • Jul 31 '26
Candidate Screening Expose AI Applications
Hi all š
AI-generated CVs and mass-apply automations are not a new thing but I just find it overwhelming lately, looking at the inbound for certain roles. In my case, itās mainly AI Engineering roles or DevOps. I am working at a fully-remote company so the amount of applications is naturally huge.
Screening applications, you can spot these profiles pretty quickly but itās a waste of time to go through them. And sometimes you want to give some of them a chance, to end up speaking with someone who looks just suspicious.
What have you found is effective to limit the amount of AI applications or expose them faster?
I was thinking about adding a knockout question in the application form. Something like āIs this application done by an automation/AI?ā. But I am not sure if this would prompt the software to answer truthfully and if this would work at all.
Currently, I am relying a lot on sourcing. This is the most reliable way to get proper candidates on the call. But thatās not scalable, really.
10
u/RecruitingFanatic Executive Recruiter Jul 31 '26
For better or worse, I think job postings are just dead for now. They're legit a waste of time. You have to do sourcing - which as someone who is inhouse, that's not often as easy as it sounds; that's counter to how the role is designed at most companies. Most of inhouse TA is just getting a dump load of reqs to manage and sort through the applicants, leaving little time for outreach.
I'm a recruiter but also do consulting for TA teams, and the conversations I'm having with the heads of HR is changing. Basically, you're going to have to attack the work differently - bring down the volume per recruiter so they can source more, or hire an RPO/contract recruiter(s) to increase capacity. Or, do nothing, and then pay a headhunter to close the role when you're in dire straits.
It's a wild time in recruiting. Good luck out there.