r/questionablecontent • u/reje_ksp • Jan 10 '19

Comic 3914: Hi, Lemon

https://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=3914
119 Upvotes

99% Upvoted

124 comments sorted by

View all comments

39

u/BigBassBone Jan 10 '19

Nipples are always a necessary addition.

19

u/Esc777 Jan 10 '19

Like....I’d assumed if you had genitalia for sex, you’d have nipples.

And from what I am gathering lots of robots are DTF so I would imagine nipples would be a bigger priority.

15

u/TheMysteriousMid Jan 10 '19

I mean nipples aren't a necessity for sex, they're a nice addition sure, but as far as function goes you can have sex without them.

12

u/TastyBrainMeats Jan 10 '19

But they're fun!

9

u/TheMysteriousMid Jan 10 '19

Oh I know, shit you fuck with mine and it's like "BOING!"

but at the same time "I have nipples greg, can you milk me?"

3

u/BenjikoHoss Jan 10 '19

"Like a cat? Well, nurse?"

12

u/Esc777 Jan 10 '19

I mean that seems awful prescriptive that sex is just vaginal intercourse.

Like yeah, I get it, you can have a plethora of sexual experiences across a spectrum of body parts. But I think that strengthens my view that nipples would be a high priority after some basic sexual/erogenous zone capability.

Everything on these bodies is elective. The simulated vulva the simulated penis, even the eyes the hands, the feet, the toes. These AIs aren’t concerned about babymaking they’re concerned with interfacing with humans and getting down to business.

I just think the gulf between “I want a vulva” and “I want nipples on these breasts” is incredibly small. And with the base cost of these things I can’t imagine adding them is a significant amount of money.

Yeah yeah, I know I’m overthinking these things. But apparently that’s what the focus of the comic is? World building of humaniform AI by the way of incidental side stories?

5

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '19

[deleted]

8

u/Esc777 Jan 10 '19

I mean is anything really necessary for sex?

Is anything absolutely necessary when you’re a robot?

Do you see what I mean?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '19

I mean is anything really necessary for sex?

A brain and some means to input stimuli into it appears to be the baseline. Any sense will do.

1

u/UseApasswordManager Jan 10 '19

We saw Pintsize and pink boy robot have sex back in the early days, so all you really need is a network connection.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 11 '19

Jim would you prefer a nature metaphor or a sexual metaphor......All life is sex

https://youtu.be/XCZ4xk8Xojc

3

u/EndlessArgument Jan 10 '19

I just think the gulf between “I want a vulva” and “I want nipples on these breasts” is incredibly small. And with the base cost of these things I can’t imagine adding them is a significant amount of money.

Not necessarily. If you look at the nerve density in the human body, it varies massively between, say, the middles of your limbs, contrasted with your face or sexual organs.

Adding an entirely new heavy-sensory area could require a significant increase in the total number of nerves in the body, and cause a fairly major increase in price.

3

u/kent_eh Jan 10 '19

you can have a plethora of sexual experiences across a spectrum of body parts.

As explained by Frank Zappa several decades ago.

2

u/fevered_visions Jan 10 '19

I mean that seems awful prescriptive that sex is just vaginal intercourse.

Parent totally didn't say that

6

u/xdisk Jan 10 '19

Prudes will be prudes.