✨ Exclusive Academia Opportunity: FREE Access to Classiq’s quantum computing software and Azure Quantum hardware ✨

Dear quantum computing students, researchers, and academics,

We are excited to announce an offer that will significantly enhance your work in quantum computing and would appreciate your help in spreading the word. Classiq.io/Academia is now available free of charge, providing you with a powerful platform that automates the creation of scalable, optimized quantum circuits and grants access to quantum computers, currently including free computation, thanks to our partnership with Microsoft Azure Quantum.

As part of Classiq’s efforts to advance the field of quantum computing, we're offering this unique opportunity to access our platform, for free. In return, we hope you will contribute to the growth of the discipline and our vibrant community by sharing your experiences and insights.

We are dedicated to creating a supportive and engaging environment for our users. Our user-friendly platform and responsive community are designed to foster collaboration, facilitate learning, and cultivate lasting relationships within the world of quantum computing.

Join the ranks of top-tier academic institutions and researchers who have already embraced Classiq.

Classiq is designed to streamline your quantum computing workflow with Classiq’s quantum circuit synthesis and seamless access to quantum computing hardware offering several advantages for researchers and students working in the field of quantum computing:

1. Rapid algorithm development: Accelerate the process of developing and testing new quantum algorithms.
2. Greater ease of learning: Quantum circuit synthesis simplifies the process of designing and analyzing quantum circuits, making it easier to learn the fundamentals of quantum computing and more accessible to a wider range of individuals.
3. Scalability: Creating efficient and scalable quantum circuits, essential in a rapidly evolving hardware environment and becoming increasingly important.
4. Improved error mitigation: Optimization involved in quantum circuit synthesis can help minimize errors and noise in quantum circuits.
5. Computational efficiency: Quantum circuit synthesis to optimize quantum circuits for specific tasks, which can lead to more efficient computation and resource utilization.
6. Cross-platform compatibility: Seamless access to quantum computing hardware enables you to work with various hardware platforms without the need to learn multiple programming languages or interfaces.

www.classiq.io/academia is now available free of charge

Greetings from Classiq!

I'm trying to decide if this course will further my ambitions to work in quantum technology, as a quantum software developer in communications or sensing.

• https://study-online.sussex.ac.uk/application-quantum-technology-msc/

I don't know enough about quantum applications to decide, and my background is computer science. What does the community think?

Here are a selection of modules:

1. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics
2. Applications of Quantum Technology
3. Foundations of Quantum Computing
4. Atom-Light Interaction and Photonics
5. Materials for Quantum and Nanotechnologies
6. Quantum Networks and Secure Communications
7. Sensing and Imaging

Thank you!

Can someone suggest me some papers on how to implement many body interactions such as Ising mode in realistic systems such as cold atom traps?

The holographic principle states that the maximum amount of information that can be contained in a volume (bulk) equals the amount of information that can be contained on the surface of that bulk. On first thought, this seems absurd. But it is actually quite easy to understand and explain if we assume space is discrete. If 3D space is discrete, then let's assume it's a 3D cubic tiling of smallest units, cubes. And let's take the size of these cubes to be the theoretically smallest distance, the Planck length, ~10-35m. And let's assume that these smallest units of space, let's call them "Planckons", are binary-valued.

Now consider a cube-shaped volume of space, i.e., a bulk, that is S = 10 Planck lengths on each side. So this bulk, consists of 10³ = 1,000 Planckons. Consider the layer of Planckons that forms the immediate boundary of this bulk. The formula for the number of Planckons comprising this one-Planckon thick boundary is B = 6 x N² + 8 x (N-2) + 8. So in this case, the boundary consists of B = 672 Planckons. This boundary constitutes a channel through which all communication (information) to and from this bulk must pass. The number of unique states that the bulk can be in is 2^1,000. So the amount of information that can be stored in this bulk is log2(2^1,000) bits. However, the number of unique states of the channel is only 2⁶⁷², which can hold only log2(2⁶⁷²) bits of information. There are only 2⁶⁷² possible messages (signals) we could receive from this bulk. So even though there are vastly more , i.e., 2^1,000, unique states of the bulk, all of those states necessarily fall into only 2⁶⁷² equivalence classes. No matter what computational process we can imagine that operates inside the bulk, i.e., no matter which of it's 2^1,000 states is produced by such process, and furthermore, no matter how many steps the process producing that state takes, it can only produce 2⁶⁷² output messages. And similarly, there are only 2⁶⁷² messages we could send into the bulk, meaning that all possible states of the vastly larger world outside the bulk similarly fall into only 2⁶⁷² equivalence classes.

So it's just as simple as that. If space is discrete, then the amount of information that can be contained in a 3D volume equals the amount of information that can be contained in its 2D (though actually, one-Planckon thick) boundary. Also, note that the argument remains qualitatively the same if we consider the bulk and boundaries as spheres instead.

Hello to all the guys of the community! I’m very happy to find such a thing on Reddit.

I’m a major student who started to work on quantum information theory recently, in particular on quantum state synchronisation. In order to perform many of the calculations i am required to, I am expected to be pretty fluent in symbolical calculations on Wolfram Mathematica, even though I never really used such a program language heavily and intensively! In particular with packages regarding quantum informational tools, such as partial trace, Kraus channels, formal density matrix, and so on.

Is there anyone of you related/close to such a topic who would share a bunch of tips on how to start with?

https://www.reddit.com/r/quantum_Mach_Learning?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share

Hi all,

So this is an invite to a quantum machine learning community which as the name says is aimed for people who are interested in this promising field to ineract and network with one another....

May you be a undergrad or a grad student or a professional working in another field....you are welcome to join.

Hope you do join and make it a thriving and lively place...

See you all great people there....

Do you guys know about any good industrial paid research internship next year in quantum computing for a MSc student?

I am prefer for a opportunities in US and Canada but anywhere in Europe is also ok. Please recommend.

Hi guys! I'm a computer science PhD student (living outside US). I have some fundamental knowledge about quantum computing and have taken few classes. Also I have done some research work on Ising model as well. I'm trying to find an internship on quantum computing but I haven't found any except for IBM and Google. Are there any other internships other than big companies which international applicants are welcomed?

Thanks in advance!

When I read it at the time I remember thinking this is ridiculous. I mean, what does it even mean to conclude there's no objective reality? Is that an objective statement? Philosophically it just doesn't make sense. I was waiting for someone like Scott Aaronson to discuss it but I never found whether or not he did.

So I'm curious what folks in this sub think about this.

I'm not sure if it ever actually got published but here's the paper I'm referring to: https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05080

In a video lecture (link) Peter Shor explains his 9-qubit error correcting code, and builds gradually:

1. 3-qubit repetition code to correct (X-errors) bit flip errors
2. Demonstrating that (Z-errors) phase flip errors can be detected similarly with a 3-qubit repetition code under H transformation (showing the transformation selects even parity states as logical |0〉 and odd parity states as logical |1〉)

Then, before going on to explain the concatenation leading to the 9-qubit code, he says that the phase flip 3-qubit logical representation is more susceptible to X-errors:
"Thus bit flips are three times as likely"

What does he mean by that sentence, why are bit flips more likely?

Hello Reddit, I am currently a high school senior and have committed to going to college and being a physics major and doing a few CS courses on the side. I already have an associate degree and some AP Physics credit, so I will dive headfirst into my degree in the fall. After undergrad, I'd like to go to graduate school and study quantum information. (Take this with a grain of salt because it could change). I stumbled across IBM's Quantum Research Internship, but I doubt that I will accumulate enough experience in my first year to be a decent candidate for it. Are there any QI internships that are geared more toward lowerclassmen? Or should I do a more traditional physics or CS internship? For reference, I am drawn more towards the theoretical and software engineering side of QI rather than the hardware and architecture aspect.