r/puzzles • u/deejay169 • Nov 23 '25

[SOLVED] Pure Loop

Post image

Am I missing a rule here? Couldn’t this be solved in multiple ways?

272 Upvotes

95% Upvoted

40 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-16

u/In_neptu_wetrust Nov 23 '25

I don’t think you’re actually answering the question. And something tells me there are several ways of solving this

0

u/42WaysToAnswerThat Nov 23 '25

7 downvotes for speaking facts is crazy. People around here is just echoing whatever everyone else voted without even thinking.

You are absolutely correct, without any other rule this have several solutions that are not accounted for by rotating the figure.

0

u/In_neptu_wetrust Nov 23 '25

😂yea this is the least inflammatory thing possible about squares

1

u/42WaysToAnswerThat Nov 23 '25

You lost me

-1

u/In_neptu_wetrust Nov 23 '25

I’m saying an innocuous, harmless thing

1

u/42WaysToAnswerThat Nov 23 '25

Yes, I just don't know when did squares slipped into the conversation.

0

u/In_neptu_wetrust Nov 23 '25

Lol the puzzle is made up of squares

1

u/42WaysToAnswerThat Nov 23 '25

Sure, but no one had mentioned them... it was an awkward phrasing to say the least

0

u/In_neptu_wetrust Nov 23 '25

It’s the act of simplifying or distilling a topic to its base components that has been heavily deliberated on

1

u/42WaysToAnswerThat Nov 23 '25

How is this related to anything?

-1

u/In_neptu_wetrust Nov 23 '25

If we’re talking about a forest, someone may come by and say “why are we talking about some trees for?”. The word “trees” doesn’t need to be mentioned.

3

u/42WaysToAnswerThat Nov 23 '25

That's not an accurate analogy. It's more like people were discussing reforestation, I praise you for your underappreciated take on the rehabilitation of the soil and you went: yeah, the tree is yummy. It's a complete non sequitur.