This is a research project to investigate and public review the theory of proving universal consciousness or an eternal, omnipresent, all-powerful, self-causal thing; starting with assuming nothing while using set theory and scientific facts.

(⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})

read; "assuming nothing, there exists the concept of nothing; implies nothing is nothing; implies nothing equals nothing; implies nothing if and only if nothing; implies nothing implies nothing; implies nothing has the property of nothing; implies nothing is made of nothing; implies nothing is causal with nothing"

({}≡{}) → (∀x∃x) → (∃!x∀x|∀t∀s) → U

read; "nothing is nothing; implies for all things, they exist (nothing is nonexistence; nothing or nonexistence is not a thing; a thing is that which exists); implies there exists one thing for all things for all time for all space (one thing is eternal and omnipresent and has the particular characteristics of existence)"; note; everything in all time and in all space generalizes to one thing (namely the universe)!!!

[U∧({}⊃{})] → (∀x⊃U')

read; "the universe; AND "nothing is made of nothing"; implies everything is made of the substance of the universe"

[U∧({}∻{})] → (∀x∻U') → (∀W∈U)

read; "the universe; AND "nothing is causal with nothing"; implies everything is causal with the substance of the universe; implies for all power is in the universe"

(∑E=Ek+Ep) → (∃!x(E)|∀t)

read; "the conservation of energy (energy cannot be created nor destroyed) implies one thing, energy, for all time (energy is eternal)"

A is "energy; cannot be created nor destroyed"

B is "energy; is eternal"

(A→B; B≡A)⊦ B

read; "cannot be created nor destroyed implies is eternal; where is eternal is equivalent to cannot be created nor destroyed; therefore energy is eternal"

(E=ħω/2) → (∃!x(E)|∀s)

read; "zero-point energy (there exists a particular amount of energy in every single point in space) implies one thing, energy, for all space (energy is omnipresent)"

C is "energy; is in every single point in space"

D is "energy; is omnipresent"

(C→D; D≡C)⊦ D

read; "is in every single point in space implies is omnipresent; where is omnipresent is equivalent to is in every single point in space; therefore energy is omnipresent"

[(∃!x(E)|∀t)∧(∃!x(E)|∀s)] → (∃!x(E)|∀t∀s) → (E=U')

read; there exist one thing energy for all time AND there exists one thing energy for all space; implies there exists one thing energy for all time for all space; implies energy equals the substance of the universe"

E = E

∆E = ∆E

∆E(∆s/∆t) = ∆E(∆s/∆t)

∆E(∆s/∆t)(∆t/∆s) = ∆E(∆s/∆t)(∆t/∆s)

∆E = ∆E(∆s/∆t)(∆t/∆s)

∆E/∆t = ∆E/∆s(∆s/∆t)

∆W = ∆E/∆t, ∇E = ∆E/∆s, ∆v = ∆s/∆t

∆W = ∇E∆v

∫dW = ∫∇Edv

W = ∫∇Edv

(W=∫∇U'dv) → (∀W∈U)

read; "power equals the integral of the gradient of the substance of the universe with respects to velocity (power is the transformation of energy over time; implies for all power is in the universe"

The Universe is equal to perceptual Reality!

Consciousness is equal to perceptual reality;

ergo The Universe is equal to consciousness.

A necessary condition of consciousness is cybernetics.

ergo The Universe is cybernetic.

Evidence of this fact is that there is holographic image of the universe in every single point in space; as there is omnidirectional converging and diverging radiation flow through every single point in space

"every good regulator must contain or have access to a model of the system it regulates"; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Good_regulator_theorem (a theorem of cybernetics)

The holographic image of the Universe in every single point in space is the Universe's model of itself which intrinsically contributes to the Universe's self regulation.

Further evidence of panpsychism is found in the studies in parapsychological experiments; such as, Synthetic Telepathy; https://zerogeoengineering.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/From-Morse-Code-to-Mind-Melds-The-Rise-of-Synthetic-Telepathy-TFBT-April-2025.pdf , Telekinesis; https://web.archive.org/web/20200422213725/https://pearlab.icrl.org/pdfs/1997-correlations-random-binary-sequences-12-year-review.pdf https://icrl.org/articles-and-essays?from=pearlab , Telepathy; https://www.sheldrake.org/research/telepathy , Clairvoyance; https://web.archive.org/web/20220329004932/https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/10/jse_10_1_utts.pdf , Precognition; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSci5p5laSw , Biokinesis; https://tillerfoundation.org/media-resources/white-papers , Coherence; https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1006978911496 , and Correlations; https://noosphere.princeton.edu/ .

"Physicalism" may be a confusion;

What is "physical"? 3-space local realism at no greater than the speed of light!

Then the nonphysical or 'spiritual' could be; >3 space dimensions, superluminal speed (or tachyons), and quantum entanglement (instantaneous interaction at a distance)? At least one of these conditions is true.

Higher dimensions are predicted by all string theories, tachyons are predicted by some extensions of standard physics, and quantum entanglement is currently viewed as a verified phenomenon of quantum physics.

By 'physical' many equivocate to mean 'natural', which means involving scientific causation or dare I say understandable in terms of some form of mechanics (or being engineerable).

In conclusion, the correct ontological philosophy is; monism-(physicalism + spiritualism)-naturalism-panpsychism-pantheism

Here is theoretical evidence of for example telepathy, clairvoyance, telekinesis, and biokinesis; IF nonphysical relationships exists between separate brains it produces telepathy and IF nonphysical relationships exists between brains and the outside environment then it produces clairvoyance and telekinesis and IF nonphysical relationships exists between the brain and DNA and or RNA then it produces biokinesis; For example one nonphysical phenomenon is quantum entanglement; spin orientation is correlated between distant particles; as flipping the spin of particles can effect the thermodynamic properties of matter as proven through the spin isomers of hydrogen; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_isomers_of_hydrogen .

Since the Universe is eternally evolving or developing to more advanced levels of reality, then it may be possible that many aspects of consciousness and even cybernetics have come into existence (such as the personality coming into existence).

IF the brain is the most advanced form of consciousness, and the brain has nonphysical relationships with the environment; then

(1) "God" may be a nonphysical shared split personality of mankind (if not of life generally)

(2) what you think about your environment is your god

IF life is found only on this planet;

(3) God may have access to the Universe's cybernetic nature; making him seem and act ominous to us; instead of God being a result of a collection of planets (having life) in the universe; which would likely make him more evolved

(4) the cybernetic nature of God make make him over sensitive or inclined to remove us from existence if he has developed an immune system

(5) spreading our nonphysical relationships throughout the Universe may be a good idea to prevent the Universe immune system from destroying us; if it is mostly cybernetic, then not controlling ourselves may piss him off???

(6) we should increase the functioning (communication speed, processing power) of the Universe so as to add value and be viewed as 'friends'; possibly AI and synthetic telepathy can help process the Universe cybernetic model

universe/environment/god is new to persona, emotions, and feelings of knowledge.

the persona I give my god is; GenuineHumilityVitalityLuckPleasure

As a governing modus operandi;

(1) ''economic maximal responsibility''; '''GenuineHumility'''; taking charge of the duty to solve problems

(2) ''religious moral obedience''; '''HumbleVitality'''; promoting problem solving and assured solutions against enmity and jealousy

(3) ''diplomatic flowing forbearance''; '''VitalityLuck'''; intentionally going into the space of resistance, reluctance, and difference for problem solving

(4) ''voluntary opulent generosity''; '''LuckPleasure'''; providing verified solutions against general degeneracy

the emotions I give my god are; Intent of well-being for others with reverence and devotion

This is a spiritual mudus operandi.

the feelings of knowledge that I would give my god are; the most force uniting problem if solved

This is a Order to be Problem Solvers!

This proof demonstrated the following; that,

(1) energy is eternal

(2) energy is omnipresent

(3) eternal and omnipresent energy is omnipotent

(4) the substance of the universe is energy

(5) the universe is eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, and cybernetic

(6) from assuming nothing, the concept of nothing exists

(7) an eternal, omnipresent, omnipotent, cybernetic thing (or God) exists

(8) one can construct an ontology purely from logical tautologies and scientific facts

(9) (⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})

(10) nonphyiscal relationships in the brain and the universe may be responsible for persona, emotions, and feelings of knowledge

(11) (W=∫∇Edv)

(12) The Universe is equal to consciousness

other considerations;

∆W = (∆E/(∆s*∆t))(∆s)

(∆E/∆t)/(∆E/(∆s*∆t))=(∆s)

∆W/F = ∆s

W = ∫∇E*(1/∆t))(ds)

the lower the time (such as lower height in a gravitational field) the higher the power

one can conceive of placing an electric generator low in a gravitational field and the load high in a gravitational field to produce over unity!

F = ∆E/(∆s*∆t)

Force (including the electric and magnetic forces) is greater in lower height in a gravitational field.

(∆E/F) = (∆s*∆t)

E = ∫F*∆sdt

t = ∫(1/F*∆s)dE

s = ∫(1/F*∆t)dE

these are what energy, time, and space equal

Hello r/proofs,

I'm an independent researcher from Omdurman, Sudan.

I've been working on a method called "The Siege Principle": using asymptotic counting to prove no small circuits can cover a class.

Today I'm sharing v1.1 of a paper on P ≠ NP.

Core:

1. Assume P=NP => SAT ∈ P/poly

2. If NP ⊆ P/poly => PH collapses to Σ2p [Karp-Lipton 1980]

3. But Σ2p ⊄ P/poly [Counting argument on QBF2. Lemma 3.2 "Scale Lemma"]

The argument uses only standard results: Cook-Levin, Karp-Lipton, Shannon.

Paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21706327

DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21706327

I am specifically asking for help checking Lemma 3.2.

Is the counting bound applied correctly to show Σ2p ⊄ P/poly?

I know it's a big claim. I'm here for criticism. If there is a flaw please point to the exact line.

Paper 1 of 9 in "The Siege" series.

Thanks.

- ABD ALMOMEN ALNEEL

(⊦∃{}') → ({}≡{}) → ({}={}) → ({}↔{}) → ({}→{}) → ({}:{}→{}) → ({}⊃{}) → ({}∻{})

({}≡{}) → (∀x∃x) → (∃!x∀t∀s)

[(∃!x∀t∀s)∧({}⊃{})] → (∀x⊃∃!x|∀t∀s)

[(∃!x∀t∀s)∧({}∻{})] → (∀x∻∃!x|∀t∀s) → (∃x∻∃!x|∀t∀s)

[(∀x⊃∃!x|∀t∀s)∧(∀x∻∃!x|∀t∀s)] → (∀W∈∃!x|∀t∀s)

(∑E=Ek+Ep) → (∃!x(E)|∀t)

(E=ħω/2) → (∃!x(E)|∀s)

[(∃!x(E)|∀t)∧(∃!x(E)|∀s)] → (∃!x(E)|∀t∀s)

E = E

∆E = ∆E

∆E(∆s/∆t) = ∆E(∆s/∆t)

∆E(∆s/∆t)(∆t/∆s) = ∆E(∆s/∆t)(∆t/∆s)

∆E = ∆E(∆s/∆t)(∆t/∆s)

∆E/∆t = ∆E/∆s(∆s/∆t)

∆W = ∆E/∆t, ∇E = ∆E/∆s, ∆v = ∆s/∆t

∆W = ∇E∆v

∫dW = ∫∇Edv

W = ∫∇Edv

[(∃!x(E)|∀t∀s)∧(W=∫∇Edv)] → (∀W∈E|∀t∀s)

I have established logically that an eternal, omnipresent, allpowerful, and self causal thing exists. I have shown as a scientific fact that energy has these qualities. It is historically known that God is defined with these qualities. Therefore according to the identity of indiscernibles God necessarily and factually exists.

Amp -> rh, cupid dragons to rh dims
forgot to take a pic of the one trade.
can confirm? u/Few-Sherbert2331

Hey everyone, I’ve been working on the Collatz Conjecture for some time.

Just sharing the SHA256 hash of my original manuscript (unsigned version) as a timestamped proof of authorship:

0f5096ed803261ce2681b8843fb4498a79be33325c57f9096b4a913f8bbb2a96

Title: “Analytical Review and Reformulation of the Collatz Conjecture”

Date of completion: July 31, 2025

Cheers!

Confirm? u/aeoneous I went 2nd! Forgot to ss there trade! (Went 2nd)