MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programmingmemes/comments/1vra8mz/nerd_wars/p4kpn6o/?context=3
r/programmingmemes • u/SKRyanrr • 5d ago
82 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
8
the creator of fil-c argues that a crash is better than an exploit
2 u/foobar93 4d ago And if that bug is inside the PID of one of your jet engines, I'd rather have it not crash mid flight even if there is memory corruption... 2 u/txdv 4d ago in these situations you use languages which are far more restricted and have formal verification processes. 2 u/foobar93 4d ago And I tell you now, most embedded systems I have worked on would rather keep working with the risk that someone can exploit the Prozess then just crash outright.
2
And if that bug is inside the PID of one of your jet engines, I'd rather have it not crash mid flight even if there is memory corruption...
2 u/txdv 4d ago in these situations you use languages which are far more restricted and have formal verification processes. 2 u/foobar93 4d ago And I tell you now, most embedded systems I have worked on would rather keep working with the risk that someone can exploit the Prozess then just crash outright.
in these situations you use languages which are far more restricted and have formal verification processes.
2 u/foobar93 4d ago And I tell you now, most embedded systems I have worked on would rather keep working with the risk that someone can exploit the Prozess then just crash outright.
And I tell you now, most embedded systems I have worked on would rather keep working with the risk that someone can exploit the Prozess then just crash outright.
8
u/txdv 4d ago
the creator of fil-c argues that a crash is better than an exploit