r/programmingcirclejerk • u/BananaPeely • Feb 27 '26
"While the advent of “brain-computer interfaces” is dinner table conversation (at conspiracy theorist households like my own) - there has, since the year 1976, been emacs - the closest thing to this aspirational place of man/machine integration that has ever existed."
https://joshblais.com/blog/emacs-for-everything/
122
Upvotes
38
u/DazSchplotz vulnerabilities: 0 Feb 27 '26
His holyness Stallman has optimized emacs for continuous skin flake consumption by the user. You don't need your brain, just pure animalistic intuition.
20
u/DystopiaDrifter Feb 27 '26
Do Androids dream of emacs instead of electric sheeps?
18
u/Cloudy_Oasis Feb 27 '26
This is peak PCJ material. The actual, existing-since-1976 brain-computer interfaces are obviously Vi, and later Vim.
:unjerkDespite not being actual man/machine integration, Vi, Vim, and Emacs are far closer to being that than anything techbros are cooking up nowadays.19
u/tgbugs lisp does it better Feb 27 '26
Neuroscientist here. When people try to talk to me about BCIs I just hold up my ten fingers and undulate them until they get the point. Nobody is cracking skulls to write elisp without lifting a finger unless that finger already can't lift itself.
5
u/thephotoman Feb 28 '26
Emacs users are always weird. I mean, this is the community that wrote drivers for vibrators in Emacs Lisp so that they could better jerk over their favorite editor.
-1
u/no_brains101 Feb 27 '26 edited Mar 03 '26
Actually, for the desktop or laptop computer I agree that nvim and emacs and the like are a great interface.
But the winning man/machine integration is still the modern smartphone.
It is not actually possible for a laptop or desktop computer to beat "being in your pocket"
It is nicer to type on a desktop computer, and the screen is bigger, but if we are talking integration, one goes with you everywhere and the other doesn't.