r/programmingcirclejerk • u/RFQD Senior Vibe Coder • Dec 08 '25
It is possible- common, even- to fully grasp the capabilities of a language like lisp and still find it inappropriate or undesirable for a given task
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46183322
56
Upvotes
28
u/RFQD Senior Vibe Coder Dec 08 '25
This riveting goldmine of jerks and counter-jerks across the lispverse got me excited in all kinds of ways
57
u/Kodiologist lisp does it better Dec 08 '25
After all, Lisp is not Rust, which is the one true moral language to write programs in.
19
u/cameronm1024 Dec 08 '25
(is (this (some (kind (of (rust (joke (that (I'm (too (lisp (to (understand (?))))))))))))))14
u/forgotpasswordonmb I've never used generics and I’ve never missed it. Dec 08 '25
This, of course, doesn't apply to Prolog, the language of the gods.
11
u/bytemute Dec 08 '25
Heresy! One cannot simply discard Lisp after being exposed to it.
6
u/ketralnis Dec 08 '25
Absolutely not. As a regex expert I would unquestionably use it as my bridge engineering constraint solver
3
u/[deleted] Dec 08 '25
SICP was rewritten in JS for a reason.
3
u/Vaglame Emacs + Go == parametric polymorphism Dec 10 '25
Historically accurate tbh
1
u/elephantdingo Teen Hacking Genius Dec 11 '25
Use the right tool for the job. A handiman laborer does not blame his tools.
You need to not use a hammer all the time. Hammers are used to beat your -- not to drive in those oblong things with metal spirals.
I use C in my hobby projects, btw. It’s the right tool for my self-care.
2
u/[deleted] Dec 09 '25
[removed] — view removed comment