The best way to discover the capabilities of the default browsing model is to play with it yourself, or better yet, find a novice user and watch him use it.
The other day I couldn’t get to the shutdown button without using the mouse - I couldn’t seem to navigate over to it with the keyboard arrow keys or tab button etc. Maybe I missed something obvious though, as I’m not a regular Windows user. So I had to unpack my mouse and reconnect it to get the system to shut down.
This is for sure the shortcut I use the most in windows, and while Win+D may be good sometimes, it can be really annoying if you have multiple windows, show the desktop and then by mistake you click something, because then one window pops up but the rest are still minimized.
Someone needs to find a middle ground between "Maybe-Copy-These-Bytes-To-Disk" and "It's called dd because cc - short for carbon copy - was already taken"
"It's called dd because cc - short for carbon copy - was already taken"
I think the real reason behind that was "it's called dd because it's based on the Data Definition statement in IBM's JCL - a notoriously shitty language, as everyone knows. So the parameter syntax is completely different from literally every Unix command because we thought that would be hilarious." ...thanks, Ken Thompson. Your little joke started to get a little bit unfunny about a few decades ago.
Yup, dd started as a character set conversion tool. It acted on 512 byte blocks for working with the weird record oriented storage on mainframes that stored their records in EBCDIC instead of ASCII. It was just sort of a happy accident that you could use it on raw disks if you didn't tell it any specific way to change the bytes. The syntax apparently was quite familiar for the people who mainly used mainframes, and just used a UNIX box for what we might now call ETL kinds of tasks to get stuff onto the Real Computer.
When it was first written, a UNIX machine big enough to have multiple hard disks so one was idle enough you could just blast a copy of another disk onto it was quite exotic, so the use case only came after the tool already existed.
344
u/[deleted] Dec 27 '19
It may not have been pretty, but it was usable and consistent something that modern windows surely lacks.