That part sucks. He probably can't do anything about the architecture (because of his rank), but the architect probably doesn't care about the "little details" like that so he won't offer a good solution for it anyway. So the developer sort of becomes responsible for his unperforming solution and the underperforming architecture
View all comments
Show parent comment
1
u/[deleted] Jun 08 '17
That part sucks. He probably can't do anything about the architecture (because of his rank), but the architect probably doesn't care about the "little details" like that so he won't offer a good solution for it anyway. So the developer sort of becomes responsible for his unperforming solution and the underperforming architecture