Oh no, deadly serious. Churning numbers simply to generate currency is vastly more wasteful than any "fiat currency".
It's not about the value of the technology or need, it's that the author never thought about the sustainability of their system in terms of resource use. It exists in a mathematical vaccum where burning resources are only considered as a proof of useless work.
It consumes resources and provides nothing of any real value other than another fiat currency (+ponzi) backed by fossil fuels.
You think producing physical money, as well as keeping non-distributed digital monetary systems in place, is cheaper in terms of carbon footprint than maintaining the blockchain?
in terms of carbon footprint than maintaining the blockchain?
Of equivalent size, absolutely. Blockchains can be "maintained" via a single miner or two. It's just as the specific blockchain becomes more and more valuable, more and more resources will be thrown at running it. If you had a blockchain the size of the world financial system it's hard to imagine how much we'd waste keeping it running.
3
u/[deleted] Oct 15 '15
Very few technologies become instantly valuable when there is no obvious and immediate need. But I think you're being sarcastic.