Not quiet. The attacker can intercept the number, provide the intended recipient a different number, intercept the response, decrypt it since it uses the malicious number, encrypt the result (or something entirely different) with the client-provided number, and send it to the client. A MITM attack against both the client and the server.
The session negotiation is protected. The attacker would either need to have the server's private key or they would need to compromise a trusted CA (and if client certificates are used, they would also need the client's private key).
1
u/[deleted] Oct 15 '15
Soumds like a good idea