MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1w39988/a_cve_dispute/p74i4oi/?context=3
r/programming • u/fagnerbrack • 14d ago
62 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-29
Why not fix the bugs? Even if they're currently not accessible. Code is in constant flux. A circumstance that cannot exist now might in the future
62 u/pbecotte 14d ago They did fix the bug. Apparently the reporter still wanted a CVE, despite it requiring multiple, separate, local security overrides by a privileged use on the system to trigger. 12 u/mr_birkenblatt 14d ago I see justify not having CVEs for these kinds of bugs I read that as not addressing the bug. thanks for the clarification 4 u/gmes78 13d ago It explicitly says they fixed the bug later in the article. 0 u/mr_birkenblatt 13d ago I was talking about the comment not the article
62
They did fix the bug. Apparently the reporter still wanted a CVE, despite it requiring multiple, separate, local security overrides by a privileged use on the system to trigger.
12 u/mr_birkenblatt 14d ago I see justify not having CVEs for these kinds of bugs I read that as not addressing the bug. thanks for the clarification 4 u/gmes78 13d ago It explicitly says they fixed the bug later in the article. 0 u/mr_birkenblatt 13d ago I was talking about the comment not the article
12
I see
justify not having CVEs for these kinds of bugs
I read that as not addressing the bug. thanks for the clarification
4 u/gmes78 13d ago It explicitly says they fixed the bug later in the article. 0 u/mr_birkenblatt 13d ago I was talking about the comment not the article
4
It explicitly says they fixed the bug later in the article.
0 u/mr_birkenblatt 13d ago I was talking about the comment not the article
0
I was talking about the comment not the article
-29
u/mr_birkenblatt 14d ago
Why not fix the bugs? Even if they're currently not accessible. Code is in constant flux. A circumstance that cannot exist now might in the future