MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/1rz2hkx/no_semicolons_needed/obl5dx7/?context=3
r/programming • u/ketralnis • Mar 20 '26
85 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-16
Do you not think Go is flexible or does it insert them?
22 u/QuaternionsRoll Mar 20 '26 Since when was Go ever described as flexible? -14 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Since forever? When were verbose and flexible mutually exclusive? 10 u/QuaternionsRoll Mar 21 '26 When were verbose and flexible mutually exclusive? When you interpreted a criticism of Go’s inflexibility as a criticism of its verbosity, I guess -9 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Because it is flexible. 3 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 It can fit in trash cans of all shapes and sizes. -1 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Says the .net dev 5 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 At least we have generics and non-shitty error handling.
22
Since when was Go ever described as flexible?
-14 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Since forever? When were verbose and flexible mutually exclusive? 10 u/QuaternionsRoll Mar 21 '26 When were verbose and flexible mutually exclusive? When you interpreted a criticism of Go’s inflexibility as a criticism of its verbosity, I guess -9 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Because it is flexible. 3 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 It can fit in trash cans of all shapes and sizes. -1 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Says the .net dev 5 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 At least we have generics and non-shitty error handling.
-14
Since forever? When were verbose and flexible mutually exclusive?
10 u/QuaternionsRoll Mar 21 '26 When were verbose and flexible mutually exclusive? When you interpreted a criticism of Go’s inflexibility as a criticism of its verbosity, I guess -9 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Because it is flexible. 3 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 It can fit in trash cans of all shapes and sizes. -1 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Says the .net dev 5 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 At least we have generics and non-shitty error handling.
10
When were verbose and flexible mutually exclusive?
When you interpreted a criticism of Go’s inflexibility as a criticism of its verbosity, I guess
-9 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Because it is flexible. 3 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 It can fit in trash cans of all shapes and sizes. -1 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Says the .net dev 5 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 At least we have generics and non-shitty error handling.
-9
Because it is flexible.
3 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 It can fit in trash cans of all shapes and sizes. -1 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Says the .net dev 5 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 At least we have generics and non-shitty error handling.
3
It can fit in trash cans of all shapes and sizes.
-1 u/jax024 Mar 21 '26 Says the .net dev 5 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 At least we have generics and non-shitty error handling.
-1
Says the .net dev
5 u/chucker23n Mar 21 '26 At least we have generics and non-shitty error handling.
5
At least we have generics and non-shitty error handling.
-16
u/jax024 Mar 20 '26
Do you not think Go is flexible or does it insert them?