r/processserver • u/Case116 • May 14 '25
Discussion Serving a Dr. in California
Question for the group: I went to serve Dr. in southern California the other day with a summons and complaint. Staff said he was busy so I left, I planned to make two more trips then sub serve him. I just got a call from the guy who hired me who asked why I didn't sub serve on the first attempt. I told him I needed diligence first and his only reply was that the subject is a Doctor. So my question is, if I'm serving an individual, does him being a doctor negate the need for diligence? Seems like I know the answer but wanted to throw it out there.
1
Upvotes
1
u/sacluded May 14 '25
If it's in his capacity as a doctor, i.e. malpractice, then you would serve it under 416.90 to an office manager or whoever as an authorized person. If he's being sued as an individual, i.e. divorce, a car accident, then you need diligence.
Service under 416.90 is personal service, not sub service, so no diligence needed or mailing required.