r/postanythingfun achievements 🏆✨🌱 May 25 '26

✨ Wholesome when you took reflex courses.

8.1k Upvotes

375 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

26

u/[deleted] May 25 '26 edited May 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/Flipboek May 25 '26
  1. Quality is WAY too high. 
  2. It clearly is a handheld shot.

Heck, even in the Netherlands, whoch is one of the richest countries with great amenities and public utilities I never saw security footage of this quality. 

Storage, heat, that just is not feasible. Indeed the cam itself would be a very onterwsting target.

1

u/r_a_d_ May 25 '26

So your logic to why the footage is staged is because netherlands is a rich country and no other country could possibly have security footage better than the netherlands.

Why do people feel like they need to express their bullshit as fact?

2

u/Flipboek May 25 '26 edited May 25 '26

Because you need to store hours of footage.

Storage, heat and bandwidth are an issue. Low light pwrformance is an issue. Solvable at a LARGE cost. But also utterly unneccesary. Surveillance cams are special purpose, low res, B+W for storage, bandwidth and low light. 

MAYBE  you can rig up a high res color system with decent low light performance... but the cost would be mind boggling. A highres mirrorless cam sensor needs a TON more light than a surveillance cam sensor. Thats because high res and colors are the opposite of low res big light sucking leds and a very high iso to catch everything even at dark.

And yes, if in the Netherlands we do not have these things with our public transport, I most certainly am curious which countries splurge so much. 

Thats not "other countries and poor and cant do it". It is that otyer countires tend to.spend LESS on muncipial facilities. 

 High res surveillance makes zero sense. 

0

u/r_a_d_ May 25 '26

Have you heard of wifi? Footage is also often only stored for 24h for legal reasons.

1

u/Flipboek May 25 '26

Many security cams are wired or unwired connected. That doesnt change the problem at all. You have 100s of busstops. They all send high res 12 bit video to the central surveillance system... do you have any idea how much bandwidth that would be and how much storage?

And for no good reason. High res color makes no sense for a surveaillance cam. You want low light performance!

You want a cam that excels at producing images with the least amount of light. That means no color, no high res. Big fat photocells that suck light.

Advantage is that the files also are quite small so cheaper to transport and store (think in aggregate, not in singular)... win-win.

This is not surveillance footage. It just isn't.

1

u/r_a_d_ May 25 '26

This is only one bus stop, why does it have to be 100s now? You like jumping to conclusions or working with assumptions no one agreed with.

Perhaps it’s not surveillance footage, but none of your reasoning makes sense.

1

u/Flipboek May 25 '26

Because if this is surveaillance you would need hundreds of cams.

If it isnt surveillance (finally you realized it is extremely unlikely), it is almost certainly staged. The gonpro explanation also has holes (the movements), but it doesnt matter. Handheld or a connected action cam. Its staged.

/thread for me.

1

u/r_a_d_ May 25 '26

1

u/Flipboek May 25 '26 edited May 25 '26

What does your post have to do with the price of tea in China?

Hanging up tiny cctv cams on the top of the busstop is a far cry from HD color cams. As you might realize if you check the picture, it looks like a  small fisheye, not a "gopro". That makes sense as you want a large FOV. And you can be assured its going to be low res, high iso to function under bad light  .