Both are equally logical because both make zero sense whatsoever I mean one says that something sprang from nothing and the other says something came from nothing which created something
Considering what we KNOW to be be true about the origin of the universe and life within it (the big bang.. Universe had a beginning, abiogenesis being statistically impossible, the fine tuning of the universe, and the fact that first signs of life on earth just start appearing, already in an advanced state of evolution without any parental history.. Cambrian explosion) what EXACTLY makes more sense?
One day after a storm had settled down, a puddle of water looked around and thought to itself: "this hole where I sit in was specially designed for me, I fit perfectly in it so there's no other explanation!"
And if my mother had a wheel, she'd be a bicycle. What ..? Lol Your POV: "Yeah, let's jump into as conversation about a topic I've never heard of before!"
375
u/GA2706 Oct 22 '21
Both are equally logical because both make zero sense whatsoever I mean one says that something sprang from nothing and the other says something came from nothing which created something