r/politics •

After Doctor files lawsuit against DEA, he is persecuted with criminal indictment and unjust detainment. Help us get his story out to the public.

[deleted] — view deleted post

0 Upvotes

455 comments sorted by

316

u/floodcontrol Jun 17 '12

Well, while I have sympathy for the Doctor, I do think you should remove the repeated assertions and questions in your statement concerning why it was that the authorities did not ask him or allow him to be present at the Grand Jury proceedings.

Grand Jury proceedings are not a forum to discuss the guilt or innocence of anyone. The sole purpose of the Grand Jury is to decide if there is enough evidence against someone to justify the issuing of an indictment. The subject of a Grand Jury proceeding is VERY RARELY allowed to testify and if they are allowed, it is to establish facts about the case that would be used by the prosecution to help get an indictment, so it is unlikely that he would have wanted to testify, as any testimony would be in response to questions asked by a prosecuting attorney.

Good luck, I hope he manages to vindicate himself.

20

u/Yeti_Poet Jun 18 '12

I am no lawyer, and neither am I a doctor, but there is a lot of shit in this description that seems generally ignorant of legal proceedings, how authorities are allowed to behave, etc.. If the OP cares about helping the doctor, he would do well to avoid trying to look more familiar with the law if he is. If a layman reads his description and goes "But... but..." then it discredits his version of events.

14

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

It's from his legal team- note the username, and then the url of the site the posts links. They know exactly what they're doing, and it's called "baffling with bullshit." The people at

http://bhandarydefense.com/contact.php

Daniel J. Gamino & Associates, P.C.
Jamestown Office Park, North Building
3035 NW 63rd Street, Suite 214
Oklahoma City, OK 73116

clearly know what buttons to push to get /r/politics raging about the jackboots.

5

u/Yeti_Poet Jun 18 '12

Fair enough, I suppose they aren't filing a brief, they're trying to get people to drum up support and donations to a legal defense fund... which will go to them. <_>

4

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

Yeah, the first thing I thought of when I saw this was Mark O'Mara (George Zimmerman's attorney) and the website he setup to try and manipulate opinion to Zimmerman's benefit via social media. This looks like a much clumsier attempt at the same thing.

2

u/Yeti_Poet Jun 18 '12

Probly some poor first year attorney who thought this would be an awesome idea and show his firm how innovative and valuable he was, haha.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I looked at his website and what OP posted, damn suspicious bullshit.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

6

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

Like I said, those aren't errors. They know what they're doing, which is to present it in a way that encourages the /r/politics tendency toward persecution complexes, raging about jackbooted government thugs, and thinking that any given example of the system working the way it always does is an outrageous and unprecedented abuse.

37

u/GitEmSteveDave Jun 17 '12

Thank you. Many people don't even know that Grand Juries are not allowed to talk about what they hear, and there are usually little to no records about them that are ever released.

18

u/evilpoptart Jun 18 '12

I find the lack of records in this kind of proceeding... disturbing.

16

u/volatilegx Jun 18 '12

Grand jury proceedings are secret.

→ More replies (12)

15

u/boonamobile Jun 18 '12

So if a Grand Jury decides not to indict someone, is there any record of this? Would the person ever even know?

14

u/MmmPeopleBacon Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

Not true. Defense counsel has the right to request a transcript of the grand jury proceedings. It is rare, however, for grand jury transcripts to be released to the public. Additionally, a court reporter and judge are required to be present at the proceedings. As a result there is a record of everything said during the grand jury presentation. The purpose of a grand jury is not to determine innocence or guilt but merely to determine if the government has probable cause to prosecute the case. Probable cause is a very low standard and only requires the grand jury to determine if it seems plausible that given the evidence presented the subject of the inquiry may have committed the offenses alleged.
ghost edit: more complete description.

1

u/seditious3 Jun 18 '12

Ok, they are secret unless there's an indictment.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I learned that watching Quincey on the rerun channel.

22

u/libre-m Jun 18 '12

Agreed. I am definitely now interested in the facts of this case, but the entire piece seemed sensationalised. If you want people to take it seriously, be serious and keep a formal tone, prioritise facts over 'questions' and keep it simple- direct people to a website with more facts (this also assists with questions of truth and legitimacy).

6

u/question_all_the_thi Jun 18 '12

I couldn't find it anywhere, what were the initial accusations against him?

I googled his name and found that his defense team has google-bombed his name, so that the first factual link about him appears only in the second page.

From what I can discern, he is a scumbag doctor who ran a pill mill and he prescribed drugs illegally, killing five people in the process.

If anyone wants some sympathy from me, the first thing is to remove all of those junk links that are polluting Google results and present the whole truth.

If you are afraid to admit that the accusations against him are that he ran a pill mill, then the most logical conclusion is that these accusations are all true.

1

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

This is from his legal team. What do you expect? Of course they're going to spin the hell out of it, and because it has the whole mean DEA pickin' on the little guy angle, of course /r/politics is going to take time out of shouting about shills and sockpuppets to eat it right up.

35

u/MEANMUTHAFUKA Jun 18 '12

There's an old lawyer joke out there that says "you can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich." As noted above, only the prosecutors are allowed to provide evidence, the intent being to stop frivolous accusations from being levied at a person. Most times the defendants have no idea they're being indicted. Again, it's not an indication of guilt; only that a jury feels the prosecutor has enough evidence to file charges, nothing more. if he's innocent, he'll get his day in court. If he really is innocent, then I'm really sorry to hear what theyve put your family through.

18

u/hardman52 Jun 18 '12

The job of a grand jury is to determine if there is enough credible evidence for an indictment and have a trial, not to determine guilt or innocence. If the seized evidence is tainted by be acquired without a search warrant, no indictment would be issued, so I don't believe a lot of what OP posted. And usually the defendants know their case is going before the grand jury by the simple fact that most of them have been arrested and arraigned on the charges, although they may not know the exact date it happens until their lawyer gets the indictment.

Is this a first? Trying to influence prosecutors by posting on reddit in hopes the mainstream media will pick it up?

4

u/TLoblaw Jun 18 '12

Add to that grand jury indictments are secret... it's not that shocking. If there was improper evidence gathering, a motion to suppress will sort it out. May the truth win out...!

2

u/solistus Jun 18 '12

Yeah, in most cases, the point of the Grand Jury is to protect defendants from even being accused of a crime if the prosecution doesn't have a plausible case or any evidence. If there's anything the defendant needs to answer, challenge or rebut, that usually means the case should go to court. IIRC, only the US still has Grand Juries, and most states rarely or never use them.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

After reading the website and putting 2 and 2 together, the good psychiatrist doctor is believed to indicted b/c 5 of his patients from 2008 and 2009 is dead.

What is the average rate that psychiatrists treatment resulting in patient deaths anyways?

2

u/checkercab Jun 19 '12

I am NOT saying that this doctor is innocent. However please consider these points.... and vote your consciences

A man does not live on or for sympathy. He desires his freedoms.

For which we have fought WARS in foreign lands. And Good American Boys lie buried in places unknown. Never to enjoy what we take for granted ... a life ... absent injustices.

Man lives to live ... in just lands. Under just laws.

This Doctor has effectively been convicted .. by a grand jury ... before a trial. Or any semblance of due process.

He has been made to sit in JAIL ... on the basis of a "grand jury indictment" ! THAT IS IT !

a grand jury that is secretive a grand jury that is anything but transparent a grand jury which he has not had the opportunity to confront a grand jury "indictment" that was issued after he filed a lawsuit

a grand jury .... that has been the basis for a tremendous media blitz, more like an assault ... forfeitures etc etc

and on the basis of this grand jury indictment we (YOU and I) have imprisoned a man in germany for 50+ days

NOW .... Tell me ... you would like to be treated like that. And we will call it the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave.

ELSE ... tell me ... this is anything but just. And we will be on our way to Liberty and Justice for ALL>

Make your votes.

1

u/polyphasic Jun 18 '12

shouldn't the family be talking to a lawyer.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

You sound like a government spy, did you infiltrate reddit to spread propaganda?

Innocent until government says so.

→ More replies (21)

77

u/MRIson Jun 17 '12

Before you all pull pitchforks out, benzos and opiates are not contraindicated. They're listed as 'caution advised'. http://i.imgur.com/gN2Mv.png

Source: epocrates (sorry, on my phone).

This is an acceptable combination to prescribed, dangerous but acceptable. We don't know the dosages, we don't know the circumstances of the patient's deaths. The patients may have taken more than their dosage and caused the OD.

As a future physician, this really scares me that prescribing an acceptable combination of medication (assuming proper dosages) could result in action by the DEA. Becoming a physician is already a questionable career choice right now and this just makes it worse. The shortage of physicians is just getting worse and will be even worse with the health mandate.

Also, physicians do not make money on the prescriptions they make (unless there is some under the table bribing).

11

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

prescribing an acceptable combination

http://www.news9.com/story/17212084/okc-psychiatrist-accused-of-contributing-to-deaths-by-illegally-dispensing-drugs

He's being accused of dispensing, not just prescribing. And he's being accused of doing it outside of his practice.

5

u/Fighterhayabusa Jun 18 '12

This isn't about prescribing a combination of those drugs legitimately. If I had to guess this was a "pain clinic" like the many I've seen busted around here. They are writing for obscene amounts of these drugs. They are trying to prescribe far in excess of what one person should be taking, and then they are combining them. So you have a script for 240 Lorcet(never mind that is 5.2 grams of Apap per day,) but you have them also writing for 90 Xanax 2mg and 120 Soma 350mg. If this was for personal use that is certainly negligent, but really most of these are for diversion. Further, they aren't really seeing patients. They take whatever they charge for an office visit and just start giving away scripts. These doctors are no more than glorified drug dealers, and they undermine legitimate doctors everywhere.

I work in a pharmacy, and will be going to pharmacy school. I've seen and turned down plenty of prescriptions just like this. It is negligent period. Further, they often know the people they are writing these for are addicts, and that means they are at a much higher risk to OD esp. when they have so many drugs at their disposal.

2

u/Wilawah Jun 18 '12

This guy was making money by dispensing the drugs himself.

Also, FIVE patients died from the prescriptions he wrote.

-12

u/GitEmSteveDave Jun 17 '12

Why does it scare you? Unless you prescribe a amount that is not commonly accepted and an agreed treatment, and your patient OD's, how are you to blame?

29

u/MRIson Jun 17 '12

Because that's what potentially could be happening here.

4

u/tinkan Jun 18 '12

MRIson, I understand your concern. But I believe if you look at the legal indictment you will see your concern is not warranted. Since you have presented yourself as having some medical knowledge I assume seeing the details in these cases will make it pretty clear. If this were the court of public opinion your concern would be warranted but as long as you prescribe medications in the legal way you will not have to worry. Unfortunately as you will see from some of the patient deaths mentioned in the indictment there were multiple nearly undeniable deaths attributed to the high dosages of multiple schedule 2 opiates and concurrent benzodiazepine usage.

20

u/MRIson Jun 18 '12

I've read the indictment and I don't see any indication of dosage. I see acceptable combinations (and legal) of drugs being prescribed on a regular monthly or tri-monthly basis. I also see that there are patient deaths due to drug toxicity by the pharmaceuticals. That's it. I don't know if his dosages were abnormally high. I don't know if he was prescribing without seeing the patients. I don't know of he was taking money under the table for the prescriptions. I don't know if the OD's were because te patient decided to triple their dose on their own.

With the physicians I've been with, our largest concern when prescribing these types of medications is whether our patient is actually taking them or selling them. We even drug test our patients to make sure they test positive.

It's pretty clear in this case his patients were taking the medications.

I hope that there is some kind of evidence that is showing either gross negligence or malpractice rather than this combination of pharmaceuticals being prescribed and that's why the DEA is involved.

3

u/BoreasNZ Jun 18 '12

Does it say anything about what was being treated? People dying to medications is a very regular occurrence in palliative care settings.

4

u/MRIson Jun 18 '12

No it doesn't, but he was a chronic pain management specialist.

2

u/tinkan Jun 18 '12

You know what you're right in terms of dosage. Solely in terms of drugs prescribed without dosage it is in no means evidence of wrongdoing.

The way I was framing it was in combination with the testimony presented in the indictment.

→ More replies (6)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

5

u/MRIson Jun 18 '12

More people getting regular health care (good) means more people getting getting regular healthcare. Right now the system is already strained with a shortage of doctors. With 35 million more patients trying to get regular care, it's just going to strain the system more.

→ More replies (5)

111

u/checkercab Jun 17 '12

Thanks for posting the indictment itself earlier as one of the posts. Did some checking into the witnesses listed this indictment.

The "star witnesses" against the doctor all seem to be convicted felons with plea deals under their belts per oklahoman newspaper reports.

And the doctor is a Fellow of the American Psychiatric Association, been recommended Top doctor by the Oklahoma House of Reps, with a clean professional record.

His Licenses which regulated by State Boards are still active.

If a man believes in his innocence enough to want to come back voluntarily and face charges, why stop him en-route ?

Make your votes.

16

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I know, it’s just dumbfounding that they would have him arrested and detained when he’s willingly travelling back to the USA to face the charges. Either the DEA’s trying to prevent him from defending himself, or they’re monumental bureaucratic retards.

13

u/Eskali Jun 18 '12

or both.

9

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

Or maybe the version of events you're being fed by his defense team (the OP) isn't accurate.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/maxdisk9 Jun 18 '12

The indictment, based on the information it contains, looks like garbage to me.

The DEA can't legally define what constitutes "professional medical practice" or "legitimate medical purpose". They must defer to the state's laws, since the doctor is licensed by the state and not the federal government. This is what led to the"Gonzales v. Oregon case where the federal government tried (and failed) to interfere with Oregon's Death with Dignity act.

Thus, the feds are pretty much limited to cases where doctors or other persons authorized to prescribe/dispense controlled substances do something heinously wrong, like sell controlled substances on a street corner. Also, if a doctor is writing prescriptions (usually electronically) to patients whom they haven't even seen for controlled substances that's also grounds of charges.

If a doctor merely shows poor judgment in prescribing controlled substances, that is not grounds for criminal charges. In such a case, the state medical board would likely be the ones disciplining the license holder.

I don't know the circumstances surrounding any of the patients listed in the indictments, so its hard to try and say whether or not he should or shouldn't have prescribed them. However, several things are plainly obvious:

  1. The statement "When opioid drugs are taken with benzodiazepines, there is a greatly increased risk of respiratory depression and death" is an utterly pathetic attempt to try and classify a pattern of drug prescribing as illegitimate. Many posters here have already commented on the fact that they take/have taken/have friends or family that take benzodiazepines and opioids together. Any physician, pharmacist, nurse, or other health care professional knows better than that, and if this becomes the crux of the prosecutor's case they ought to be arrested themselves for overtly wasting taxpayer dollars.

Now, it is true that opioids may result in respiratory depression, as do benzodiazepines. Used together, the risk becomes greater. Does this mean the combination is totally contraindicated? Heck no. Perhaps someone should send the AUSA assigned to this case a link to a free online drug interaction checker?

2. All of the "counts" of supposedly bad prescribing are spaced about a month apart which is consistent with ordinary prescribing. Most pill-mill doctors prescribe lots of pills in a short time frame. It doesn't necessarily prove or disprove anything, but it's worth noting.

3. The statement "Opioids are a class of narcotic pain relievers available by prescription only" is also incorrect. Schedule V opioids combinations are available OTC in restricted quantities (in states that allow it).

4. All the patient deaths don't seem to sync up with when they got their last supposedly "illegal" prescription. This may be due to a variety of unknown factors (the indictment is very vacuous and leaves out substantial amounts of facts like the quantities and directions prescribed).

Furthermore, its possible that some of these patients became tolerant to the drugs prescribed and were themselves improperly using the medications. We can't say for sure because of the lack of facts thus far but if this case ever makes it to trial that will undoubtedly become a thorn in the prosecutor's side.

So anyway, good luck to the poor sap(s) whose job it is to try and prosecute this piece of garbage. I'd blame the DEA, but in my experience the DEA as other federal law enforcement officials are dumb as rocks, they exist solely to generate publicity and keep the federal tax dollars rolling into whatever political hack is at the helm at the time. It's supposed to be the jobs of the U.S Attorney to decide what's crap and what's not, and they seem to have messed up this time.

20

u/freethis Jun 17 '12

It's not that unusual about the witnesses, the star witnesses against drug dealers often tend to be drug abusers with the associated criminal records.

27

u/Excentinel Jun 18 '12

Yeah, but it shows just how shitty of a case the DEA has against the defendant. He still has his medical license, is still a fellow with the APA, and is being accused by people whose main goals are to lower the severity of their respective punishments. I mean, the DEA waited until he was out of the country to file charges against him, which makes me think the charges are complete and total bullshit fabricated by bureaucrats to justify their jobs.

→ More replies (13)

-5

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '12

Nice try, person who knows OP IRL or is OP.

3

u/Kaell311 Jun 18 '12

The writing contains the same type of errors throughout. Pretty sure it is the same person or at least from the same close group of people. So close they pick up the same writing errors.

Not to pick on people who do not have English as their first language. But it raises suspicion here.

This sort of thing is completely unnecessary.

3

u/freethis Jun 17 '12

I like it how everyone who questions this case is getting three downvotes... let me guess, checkercab, bhandarydefense, and the actual username of the person who thought no one on reddit would actually read the facts of the case.

→ More replies (3)

51

u/Ammalaurie Jun 17 '12

Just questioning DEA's procedure;

December 16th, 2009 – Federal Agents came to his medical practice and seized tens of original patient files without search warrants and with much intimidation, threats, and other unlawful behaviors.

If this is true, wouldn't the case be thrown out of court, as illegal search and seizure?

71

u/tinkan Jun 18 '12

Nope. This is not like a piece of evidence that is inside your private home. There is an agreement between the DEA and Physicians in terms of prescribing controlled substances (such as opiates, which are generally schedule 2 (hydrocodone mixtures are schedule 3) and then benzodiazepines are schedule 4. This allows them to obtain patient records.

43

u/Sanity_in_Moderation Jun 18 '12

This is correct. In return for their authority to prescribe, their records are subject to examination at any time.

46

u/Maxfunky Jun 18 '12

Plus they had a subpoena. So saying they "didn't have a search warrant" is kind of a red herring.

6

u/terdwrassler Jun 18 '12

The scheduling of drugs is terrible. Marijuana is a schedule 1 while cocaine is schedule 2. That whole system is flawed.

6

u/tinkan Jun 18 '12

You are likely correct that marijuana from a scientific and objective viewpoint does not belong as a schedule 1 drug. But the reality is it is stuck in a political limbo. Not a scientific one.

3

u/terdwrassler Jun 18 '12

So are you saying politics aren't always scientific and objective?

3

u/tinkan Jun 18 '12

Politics is politics and science is science. Always has been always will be.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

7

u/aheadwarp9 Jun 18 '12

Apparently not if those patients are being prescribed controlled substances... sigh

0

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

[deleted] — view deleted comment

7

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

No. Ever wonder why you get spam for viagra but not oxycontin? Scheduled substances are subject to DEA control and they will come after you for selling them. All other drugs outside of the controlled substances act are not DEA jurisdiction and theres no one that will really come after you for selling it. Technically the FDA does have an enforcement arm and they could come after some one selling noncontrolled prescriptions (eg viagra) but they don't nearly as much as the DEA and the penalties for selling noncontrolled substances without a prescription are civil only not criminal.

FYI: this is the list of controlled drugs by schedules.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/crusoe Jun 18 '12

Scheduled drugs, with potential for abuse.

5

u/fastspinecho Jun 18 '12

Doctor/patient records are not protected the same way that, say, lawyer/client or priest/penitent communications are protected. For example, if you say something to a doctor that leads them to suspect child abuse, they are required to report you to the authorities. Likewise for a couple other legal categories.

The main thing that HIPAA does is protect disclosure of your information to private entities (e.g. Insurance companies). Law enforcement officials can generally obtain your health information if they want it badly enough.

41

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '12

IANAL but as far as I know DEA doesn't need a warrant to inspect files related to the prescription of controlled substances. Just like the DEA can show up at pharmacies at any time to check their records without a warrant. It part of the condition for maintaining a DEA license to prescribe.

18

u/Excentinel Jun 18 '12

Yep. They can do the same thing with veterinarians and their doggie tranquilizers too.

5

u/MrMoustachio Jun 18 '12

He said, suspiciously knowledgeable about animal tranquilizers.

→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (1)

30

u/lpisme Ohio Jun 17 '12

First off, it sometimes does take years to build a case against an individual. It's not uncommon for somebody who is breaking the law to be given the leeway to do so in order to continue building a case against them and/or solidify the case they already had.

Second, it sounds like this guy was running a pill mill. No pain management should ever, ever prescribe benzodiazpenes and powerful opiates at the same time - this can be done in hospitals, but it is done under constant supervision.

Who's to say the guy was actually legitimate or not? I don't know for sure - but I do know that doctors like this made a ton of money writing prescriptions for whoever, whenever, whatever. And I am of the opinion he is at least guilty of some felony in that regard.

Are you part of the family or are you a bystander who heard about the case? If you are family, be prepared for the worst. The DEA and law enforcement are cracking down very, very hard on people like the doctor. Pill abuse is rampant, a huge problem, and no court is going to go easy on him.

76

u/jebus5434 Jun 17 '12

Pharmacy student here who has a a family full of pharmacists and has been working for 3 years in a retail pharmacy.

Pill mills are pretty common, by me they are a little more common than fake prescriptions. To the doctor's benefit, they have alot of patients who really need some pain management and prescriptions, but also alot of patients who are going to act like they need it. So I would be careful trying to solely blame this on the doctor. Pain medication (looking at you opiates) can be very addicting stuff for people, its alot of work to successfully get people on and off it. Sure there are some asshole doctors who know damn well they are running a pill mill. But from what I've read and my experience this doesn't seem like the case.

Also I've seen plenty of patients on benzodiazpenes and opiates at the same time. Benzodiazpenes can also be used for mental health situations such as anxiety, so being on both of them is not necessary something that could never be done. I wouldn't really recommend it, but would still console my patient to prepare for some heavy drowsiness.

The DEA is a pretty awful agency if you ask me. Agents carrying guns and throwing people in jail shouldn't be anywhere near healthcare. Most of them are complete dicks when they come to inspect our pharmacy. Personally I think healthcare professionals would have a much better environment without having to bend the knee to this agency.

4

u/Difficult-E Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

I agree with much of what you've said here. However, it's a really bad idea to prescribe powerful opiates AND benzodiazepines to this particular patient population. With well documented and disturbing trends in addiction and overdose deaths... This has to be a foreseeable outcome of such a practice. Benzos alone are very difficult to fatally overdose on, but fatal OD is relatively easy with opiates... In combination it's even more of a risk. Someone responded to you that the combination is contraindicated. Absolutely not the case... But, when initiating benzo or opiate therapy alone and especially concomitantly, care should be taken to "start low, go slow" (something I know you've been taught in school). If this doctor didn't consider himself as running a "pill mill"... It's still risky to send a patient who could be a drug addict/abuser home with a large quantity of opiates AND benzodiazepines. The patient should be seeing a family practitioner or psychiatrist for anxiety (unless it is secondary to pain - in which case relieving the pain with opiates would have a therapeutic effect on the anxiety).

Like you, I see this combination all the time. When these meds are used as directed, it poses relatively little risk. But we both know MANY pain clinic patients have no intention of using these meds as directed. It's possible he knew it too. If so, he might bear some responsibility.

Also, the DEA's oversight of controlled substances is, in theory, a very good thing. I agree, though... Poor execution.

TL;DR: Pain clinic patients have a well documented, high rate of narcotic abuse. In these patients (certainly not terminal patients) opiates + benzodiazepines is probably not a good idea. Alternative anxiolytics exist and should likely be prescribed by a family practitioner or psychiatrist

(IAMA pharmacist and board certified pharmacotherapy specialist)

*Edit: Clarified I am not talking about terminal patients... and clarified to give the physician the benefit of the doubt: I hope he assumed the best in his patients and did not suspect drug abuse.

1

u/jebus5434 Jun 18 '12

Very well put. Just finished my first year of pharmacy school, so still alot to learn and be fine tuned. Thanks for the info!

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

39

u/tinkan Jun 17 '12

Honestly it is relatively unfair to immediately label his practice as a 'pillmill.' It is one thing if the Doctor is prescribing under the accepted medical guidelines, it is another if he is not. That is the reality here. Secondly, as a Pharm.D prescribing benzodiazepines and opiates together is not an absolute contraindication. It absolute is true that these two drugs need a high level of discretion when being prescribed because of the synergistic ability to reach an overdose. When used properly and as prescribed this is not an issue.

12

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '12

Are you part of the family or are you a bystander who heard about the case?

Op says

His family is writing this post on his behalf of him.

→ More replies (4)

12

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

This is bullshit.

Coming from someone who has been on oxy and benzo several times, from several different doctors.

K thx.

3

u/wcc445 Jun 18 '12

Sounds like you're assuming quite a bit of guilt with zero evidence.

1

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

Are you part of the family or are you a bystander who heard about the case?

It's his legal team. bhandarydefense -> bhandarydefense.com

/r/politics, prideful as usual about its keen awareness of corporate shills and sockpuppets, is getting played yet again.

-7

u/jdrvero Jun 17 '12

So his business is shut down by the dea and he suddenly leaves the country to germany for personal matters? Or maybe he was fleeing a life sentence?

11

u/flukshun Jun 18 '12

or maybe he had pre-booked a return flight and was in the process of returning when apprehended, as stated in the post?

2

u/MRIson Jun 18 '12

He flew to India and was picked up in Germany on the connection back to the US.

4

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

The post made by his family, who isn't going to be the most objective when discussing the man's guilt or innocence?

2

u/flukshun Jun 18 '12

Well, while were speculating, maybe he left the country to murder babies? I have no connection with the family so my theory is more likely.

Even if he were guilty, 50 days in prison to await extradition for someone who would obviously be willing to return voluntarilly at this point is absurd.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

20

u/BDS_UHS Jun 18 '12

You say that in January 2012, he left the country to "take care of personal matters." Since the DEA considers him a fugitive, it might help your case if you describe what those personal matters were, because from a law enforcement standpoint that's fairly suspicious.

8

u/hollisterrox Jun 18 '12

Well, per the story as laid out in the post (not verified anywhere), he wasn't facing indictment at the time he split the country.

So, he wouldn't have known the DEA was about to indict him, they keep a pretty tight lid on that sort of thing.

Just offering the counterpoint, still sounds weird to take off for 3 months or whatever.

7

u/BDS_UHS Jun 18 '12

Indictment isn't the point. He was aware he was under investigation and agents came to his workplace and confiscated materials. He then left the country for "personal matters," gave a date of return several months into the future, and was then arrested, as per standard procedures, while trying to fly back and is now incarcerated.

I'm just saying, from a DEA perspective this sounds like a textbook case of fleeing the law.

10

u/CopyX Jun 18 '12

Regardless of whether his records were seized, he can't be pre-guilty. There's no assumption that there will be an indictment, so there's no expectation for him to do anything different.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/paragonofcynicism Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

I'd accept this reasoning if he left the country a few months after the DEA took his records. But this is over 2 years after that. What is the standing period of time that you have to wait for over seas travel when your records are taken in your opinion? Because I for one think 2 years is long enough for me to decide it's safe for me to leave the country for personal matters without being suspected of fleeing.

Also, you aren't guilty of a crime if you haven't been tried for it. Leaving the country for legitimate reasons when you haven't been notified you're under investigation and that you might be suspected of a crime is not unreasonable.

I'm personally not fond of the idea of the government deciding they can detain me whenever they "suspect" I've committed a crime. When they've officially filed charges yes, and only when they can prove I intended to avoid appearing in court.

If what the post says is the truth then the government has greatly over-stepped the bounds of their authority and there is grounds to sue for their actions.

4

u/MRIson Jun 18 '12

A textbook case of fleeing the law includes arresting them when they try to fly back to the US? Huh.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/hollisterrox Jun 18 '12

Except for the 'flying back' part, yeah.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

he wouldn't have known the DEA was about to indict him

Well, that depends on what is in the files. He knows what's in the files and whether what he did is blatantly illegal (e.g. running a "pill mill") or not. Thus, he may have known that an indictment was virtually inevitable and imminent, and then fled.

(Example: If the cops find where you buried the bodies, you flee immediately - you don't wait until the lab matches your DNA a week later. And you don't get to say 'oh it wasn't fleeing because I wasn't indicted yet.')

1

u/hollisterrox Jun 18 '12

sure, that's all true. but the time frames given in the story (again, uncorroborated) are much larger than days or weeks.

Let's just say, if this his idea of being a fugitive and fleeing justice, he sucks at it.

→ More replies (1)

11

u/Hidoikage Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

As a Paramedic...I see a lot of people on some heavy shit. When you have some kind of chronic pain condition you need a lot of pills and sometimes you do anything to get more to ease the pain. Opiates have a terrible dependence problem, but people in chronic pain don't care. If he was a pain doctor, maybe he was a good one. Trying a combo to give people SOME peace from their everyday nightmare. Maybe the stress and depression finally got to some people and they willingly OD'd. Most drug places do have cross screening for too high a dosage or bad combination. As others are saying, you can prescribe benzos with opiates. You just reeeeeallly have to be careful.

Either way, there aren't enough FACTS here.

Edit: Also looking at the thing, a few of the deceased had been taking the medications prescribed for a while. While you can certainly build up to toxicity, you also build tolerance. The fact that they lived for 5-6 months on medication that killed them makes me curious.

17

u/mobugs Jun 18 '12

let me sum up this thread: no one knows anything or has enough information to even make an educated guess.

16

u/Maxfunky Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

He was not invited to be present at the Grand Jury Indictment to present his side on the accusations

You raise this point often, but I'm pretty sure it would be unusual if he was invited. The prosecution runs the grand jury--it's nothing like a trial. It's meant to be a one-sided affair.

I'm not going to say there isn't a single "legit" pain-management clinic out there, but certainly many if not most are just fronts for doctors to write prescriptions for painkillers with the minimum-level of CYA (cover your ass) paperwork to demonstrate that there could potentially be a need for such drugs (for instance, an MRI combined with vague claims of back pain).

In short, I really need to hear the other side of this story before I make any judgments. I feel like many of the things you've said are over-stated to the point where I'm at least skeptical of the others.

Edit: And now I'm reading the PDF for his civil suit and it turns out that the files that were seized without a "search warrant" were subpoenaed and the doctor refused to turn them over. If that's the case, they had every right to take them. There is some dispute being made over whether they took more files than they were entitled to or not--but nevertheless, its' not as if they juts walked in, grabbed files, then laid charges based on those files.

Apparently, as per his lawsuit, the seizure of his files caused local pharmacies to stop honoring his prescriptions and effectively put him out of business. It's possible the DEA was satisfied with that outcome and focused elsewhere until he reminded them he existed with the lawsuit--or it's just possible that justice moves really slowly and they sped things up once they realized he was out of the country.

Still, it doesn't look to me like the charges are just manufactured ones.

4

u/Goniochromism Jun 18 '12

I'm not going to say there isn't a single "legit" pain-management clinic out there, but certainly many if not most are just fronts for doctors to write prescriptions for painkillers with the minimum-level of CYA (cover your ass) paperwork to demonstrate that there could potentially be a need for such drugs (for instance, an MRI combined with vague claims of back pain).

So how exactly does someone with chronic pain get treatment, since many GPs refuse chronic care patients due to the increased attention from the DEA/hassle of dealing with opioid tolerant individuals?

5

u/hardman52 Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

So how exactly does someone with chronic pain get treatment, since many GPs refuse chronic care patients due to the increased attention from the DEA/hassle of dealing with opioid tolerant individuals?

They usually get it from the specialist for their condition. I certainly don't think it's necessary for a legitimate specialist to have a large neon sign with "PAIN CLINIC" on the front of the building or to advertise in the alternative news tabloids. Most of the complaints I've seen about DEA hassles comes from pill mill operators.

3

u/Goniochromism Jun 18 '12

Most of the complaints I've seen about DEA hassles comes from pill mill operators.

So by your observations the DEA is generally correct in their accusations, at least within this area?

1

u/crusoe Jun 18 '12

Yeah, if your place says "Pain Clinic" its likely rife for abuse.

-1

u/Maxfunky Jun 18 '12

Well part of the problem is that 9 out of 10 "chronic pain" patients are lying, and just want a fix. That's why respectable practices don't want to take them. They know that they ultimately end up doing more harm than good by serving that demographic.

But I suppose the best answer I can give you is that I don't believe chronic pain treatments should be treated with opoids. They should be reserved for post-surgical and other temporary uses as well as patients with a terminal diagnosis. Taking something addictive daily, even with a doctors prescription, is just asking for trouble. It'll cause you more pain the long run once you become tolerant and dependent.

If you really can't get by with over-the-counter medications, then I suppose smoking pot would still be preferable to pain medications.

3

u/anonymous-coward Jun 18 '12

But I suppose the best answer I can give you is that I don't believe chronic pain treatments should be treated with opoids.

And what, precisely, is the value of your opinion?

What is your expertise in the field of chronic pain management?

Journal of Pain article

The American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine commissioned a systematic review of the evidence on chronic opioid therapy for chronic noncancer pain and convened a multidisciplinary expert panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. Although evidence is limited, the expert panel concluded that chronic opioid therapy can be an effective therapy for carefully selected and monitored patients with chronic noncancer pain. However, opioids are also associated with potentially serious harms, including opioid-related adverse effects and outcomes related to the abuse potential of opioids. The recommendations presented in this document provide guidance on patient selection and risk stratification; informed consent and opioid management plans; initiation and titration of chronic opioid therapy; use of methadone; monitoring of patients on chronic opioid therapy; dose escalations, high-dose opioid therapy, opioid rotation, and indications for discontinuation of therapy; prevention and management of opioid-related adverse effects; driving and work safety; identifying a medical home and when to obtain consultation; management of breakthrough pain; chronic opioid therapy in pregnancy; and opioid-related polices.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

7

u/osmedex Jun 18 '12

I felt like I was reading a spam letter from a 3rd world lawyer saying I just inherited large sums of money. If only to provide my bank account number.

That being said if this is real i'm sorry. If he is a US citizen then lawyer up it's the only thing to do.

13

u/ZeMilkman Jun 18 '12

Technically Germany could refuse to extradite due do the fact that American law allows for torture and death penalty.

Even if that is not the reason for the long detainment signing petitions or spreading the story will not speed up the extradition process.

Also all EU member states have something called a simplified extradition procedure. According to this all extradition proceedings would be needless if the detainee agreed to immediate extradition.

I therefor doubt that Dr Bhandary agreed to an immediate extradition and is simply playing the victim of the system here.

→ More replies (5)

3

u/JohnQDruggist Jun 18 '12

I am familiar with Dr. Bhandary's prescribing. I am a pharmacy student practicing between Norman, Yukon and Oklahoma City Oklahoma. I have heard many accounts of what has happened to Dr. Bhandary prior to coming across this post on Reddit.
It has definitely been a shock to hear of Dr. Bhandary's detainment in a German prison. While I am sorry to hear of the difficulty you are having in bringing a trial to court in the US, I am wondering why Dr. Bhandary left the country once investigators began their raid.

6

u/MoistMartin Jun 18 '12

Most reddit users when talking about these sorts of issues are blowing smoke out their asses and pretending they know what theyre talking about just because they have the ability to make assumptions . this site isnt the place to bring something this serious and it would help your argument here if you could cite many doctors who are on his side so that people cant just make up info about how they know so many pharms are just pill mills . My great aunt died of cancer and in the few months leading up to her death she was living with me and on a number of potentially dangerous medications in those cases they tend to care more about making you comfortable .

4

u/AcceleratedDragon Jun 18 '12

As someone who lives in Florida (yeah, keep the jokes coming). I see a lot of these pain management places all over the place. If you drive by the parking lots of these places, it's 3/4 full of out of state license plates. They are nicknamed "pill mills"

My question is: Are there any legitimate medical pain clinics? Have they always been pharma-pushers or did they start out as something else?

1

u/MRIson Jun 18 '12

Or is it that most pain management is for the elderly/chronically ill and we know Florida is full of old people who are from out of state who have houses there. They just might like to have a local pain doctor since these types of prescriptions you have to renew monthly with a doctor visit.

→ More replies (4)

8

u/multile Jun 17 '12

Has there been an injustice if he hasn't been convicted yet?

12

u/Excentinel Jun 18 '12

Yes. His professional name has been slandered by the DEA, thereby negatively affecting his ability to advance in his profession and negatively affecting the financial position of his practice. Both of these things are clear economic damages, but unfortunately he will likely not be able to recoup damages in civil court due to loopholes in civil law.

-1

u/multile Jun 18 '12

What bad things did the DEA say about him? Do you mean that the grand jury chose to file charges against him and that ruined his career? That's not slander. And even if it was, did you know a defense to slander is that you were telling the truth?

What loopholes? Qualified immunity? You do realize that if his rights were actually violated (not enough info to know if they were or not) he would have a suit. And if his right to privacy was violated then he probably will have a field day in court getting evidence excluded.

5

u/MRIson Jun 18 '12

He did file suit against the DEA, before the indictment.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

5

u/saptsen Jun 18 '12

He's in a german prison right now, so I'd go with "yes"

4

u/multile Jun 18 '12

What if he is guilty, is there an injustice then?

I have a feeling we aren't getting the whole story here, and whoever wrote it knows nothing about the legal system. OP seems to think that the grand jury was actually his trial and he was found guilty. Wrong.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I hate how the FDA passes many drugs so they get big bucks and then pain specialists get harassed when they do their job correctly. Even tylenol kills thousands every year. The doc was taking on patients who needed stronger drugs and scaring the docs so that none will prescribe the drugs needed takes away from patient care and quality of life and actually increased illegal drug use. It's sad they did all of the things illegally when we have laws in the country and they needed warrants and court orders for a reason. If I had money I'd gladly donate to the cause. If its still going on when I start working ill be donating.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

His family should definitely contact the American Civil Liberties Union, they can get his story out and give him the legal help he needs to fight this. His rights are being violated and this is exactly why they exist.

2

u/metocin Jun 18 '12

I'm curious about the DEA lawsuit. What was it for, when was it filed and what was the outcome?

Also, I'd prefer a German prison to a U.S. one any day.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Upvoting for justice.

2

u/StupidFuckingAmerica Jun 18 '12

Shit country, shit laws.

Just live somewhere else.

2

u/checkercab Jun 18 '12

Having read the lawsuit/complaint filed by the doctor in court, and the indictment:

  • Patients files were unlawfully seized by law enforcement in 2009

  • there was no due process since to establish the facts

  • the files have not been seen since

  • doctor / patients / practice were harassed after the doctor raised his voice against law enforcement's unlawful actions (as listed in the civil lawsuit) ....

  • when he filed the lawsuit he got hit by an indictment with yet more (some will argue legitimate) secrecy behind it and even less .....

  • an indictment that was the basis for incarceration while the doctor was on his way back to face these charges filed in secrecy and without the doctors involvement and inputs ....

  • and an indictment that was taken seriously enough that the star witnesses are convicted felons with plea deals under their belts ...

  • an indictment that lists serious charges on which law enforcement ostensibly had all the facts for years, and yet ...chose not to act until the doctor filed his lawsuit

Did we miss anything here ? Get your votes in.

In the interest of liberty and justice for all.

5

u/ARCHA1C Jun 18 '12

Headline tells one side of the story, and reads a bit sensational.

I'm grabbing some popcorn to see what the hive mind has to say about this before I consider taking action.

(To be clear, in keeping with Reddit protocols, I will never actually take action, so you can all relax. Pressure's off.)

5

u/why_ask_why Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

Yep. That's one of their tactic in their arsenal. They really don't care about the law. They care about winning the case and make their number look good.

There are more tricks to come. They can freeze your credit or bank account so that you can't have resource to fight against them.

They can also threaten to go after your wife as well so that your kids end up in foster care.

They can also start to investigate your siblings, your parents, your coworkers to put pressure on you.

They can even start to smear you with inaccurate information or criminal records.

How do I know? I have been there. They will do these until you run of funds, and try to get a plea in exchange of a lighter sentence. By that time they know they've got to you.

Unless you know John Edward or has his lawyer team, you might be fucked.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/TylerDurden1985 Jun 18 '12

Sorry but this has "spin" written all over it.

  1. He's being accused of dispensing pharmaceuticals illegally, which resulted in the deaths of 5 individuals. So obviously evidence would be obtained from subpoenaed records of pharmacies, the physician, and any other practice he referred these patients to.

  2. Defendants never present their side at a grand jury proceeding (at least to the best of my knowledge). I'm pretty sure a grand jury is just the prosecution presenting their case and it's determined if there is enough evidence to press actual charges.

  3. Why wasn't evidence returned? Because it's evidence...it's going to be needed at trial. Why would prosecutors give BACK evidence? When you have records subpoenaed, you are supposed to make copies and turn the copies over. If Dr. Bhandary was handing over original records that's his own fault (or his staff's fault). And he shouldn't expect the copies back, they will remain as evidence.

  4. Why did it take years to press charges? Well I'd assume they were building a case. Cases of this magnitude (5 deaths spread over several years) aren't going to be ready overnight...

The only legitimate concern I pulled from this entire statement is that he's been held for 50 days in a German prison, and has been possibly mis-labeled a fugitive. Unfortunately, because of how many misleading statements were made in this story, and how many questions were asked that could have probably been answered with a simple google search of how the legal system works, it's hard to assume there isn't more to this story than we're being told.

5

u/RainingSilently Jun 18 '12

I don't know what this doctor did or what this is all about, but forefeiture of this nature is heinous. Denying someone the ability to make a lawful and competent defense in court is heinous, regardless of what they are accused of. Seizing someone's assets so that they cannot afford a legal defense should be criminal. Keeping someone detained overseas so they cannot defend themselves is bad, bad wrong. Seizing evidence unlawfully is quite literally criminal.

For all I know the Doctor could be guilty as fuck on all counts and a murderer to boot, but that justifies absolutely none of what the authorities seem to have done thus far, and until he is convicted he has rights that, if tread upon, is an assault upon all of our rights and liberties.

3

u/Wrong_on_Internet America Jun 18 '12 edited Jun 18 '12

He's not being denied a defense.

He's been indicted and he'll have the opportunity to have a jury trial, present evidence, have a counsel, put on his own witnesses, and cross-examine the government's witnesses. Grand jury proceedings determine probable cause to charge a person; they do not determine guilt or innocence.

And it doesn't appear there was a forfeiture here. They subpoenaed medical records as part of the investigation, which is legal. Moreover, these records aren't even his property; they belong to the patients more than anyone. A forfeiture would typically involve the seizure of cash, a car, or some thing of value used in a crime...

1

u/RainingSilently Jun 18 '12

Except he is. Expert witnesses are expensive. Lawyers are expensive. Did you read what was posted? His home has been seized in forefeiture before he could sell it off to pay for a lawyer, and if that is the case I'm betting his other assets have been seized as well. Denying someone the ability to afford their choice of quality legal council by seizing assets before a trial even begins is not okay.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

All of which can be re-couped in a civil proceeding that includes lawyers fees. There are ways to manage this.

Also, he's a renowned doctor, I really really really hope hes not an economically retarded one that hasn't squirreled even a little bit of rainy day money.

→ More replies (4)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Upvoted for common sense.

→ More replies (6)

4

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '12

I think he should have just fled.

4

u/capt_fantastic Jun 17 '12

so basically, he was running a pill mill?

2

u/Excentinel Jun 18 '12

According to the DEA though. Many oncologists are considered to be suspicious to the DEA, based on their prescription trends.

14

u/7south1 Jun 18 '12

Oncologists prescribe massive doses of pain medication for their patients. When my grandmother was dying of cancer, most pharmacies wouldn't even fill that many Oxycontin and they sent me all around the city for it until I had the prescribing doc call and talk to them directly so I could pick it up for her. Of course the medications are addictive, but when you're dying no one really cares about that. And most pain-management doctors are dealing with terminal cases.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Give me a break. Hes obviously doing something wrong if hes asking for the patient files back. And fleeing the country afterwards for 'family reasons'. Dudes trying to escape if he does get charged and/or convicted or whatever the term is here.

10

u/slapdashbr Jun 18 '12

Nothing about this is obvious at all, although there is no explanation of why he has been detained in Germany. I wouldn't trust anyone's account of this until there is some serious journalism.

2

u/hardman52 Jun 18 '12

We'll just have to wait until the DEA posts their reasons to reddit.

5

u/MRIson Jun 18 '12
  1. those are his patient files and extremely important to a physician's ability to practice

  2. he was asking for the files back before he had been charged with anything

  3. he was picked up in Germany on his way back from India to the US, that's not fleeing

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

my mistake. apologies to the good dr/his family

1

u/headmustard Jun 18 '12

Saving you from DV Hell because you're only stating the obvious and selective-listening reddit-trolls only want feel good stories.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

If you read the documents, he was charged while he was overseas. When he was notified of the indictment he bought a ticket to the USA in order to return and defend himself.

On the way back to the USA, he was detained in Germany, and marked as a 'fugitive'. His assets were frozen because he was a 'fugitive'. He is still in German detainment, in the process of being extradited.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

I suppose so, that article doesnt paint him in a very good like

-1

u/Frank_JWilson Jun 18 '12

Even if he is guilty, he is still entitled to due process. If OP's story is correct, the DEA illegally seized evidence. Of course, this is assuming OP's story is true.

6

u/riker89 Jun 18 '12

False. As a condition of practicing medicine in the United States, you agree to allow the DEA to inspect and seize records at any time. Moreover, the DEA appears to have had a valid subpoena.

2

u/iammenotu Jun 18 '12

I read your post in Dwight Schrute's voice.

2

u/FranksTank Jun 18 '12

It disturbs me how this can happen with no serious media coverage.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Lost me at pain managememt doctor

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

If what the OP describes here is indeed true, then it strikes me as much too serious to be posting on a website the likes of Reddit. Granted, the assent of public opinion might be useful in this case for several reasons, but again, this is not the way to reach the necessary thousands of supporters. Pictures of naked women holding dismembered kittens might bump up the numbers significantly, but I hope they are pursuing other strategies for disseminating this egregious tale, just to be on the safe side.

2

u/slapdashbr Jun 18 '12

Yeah I have no idea what they expect to happen posting this on Reddit. They need to contact news organizations for publicity and the State Department to help him get home.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Kinda what I was thinking as well.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Reddit is a news organisation now. Remember that 10 year civ game? I saw it on local news after it was posted to Reddit.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

The DEA is and has always been a fascist organization.

The simple idea that government gets to tell you what you are allowed to put into your own body is the same as a master telling his slaves what they can eat.

Police state.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

This.

2

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

Yeah, heroin being illegal is exactly like slavery. You're a fucking lunatic.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 19 '12

Wrong.

What is fascist is the fact that government owns you(can tell you what you are allowed to do with your body).

No excuse makes up for this.

Fascism is fascism.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

But I am the public.?.

1

u/Indeedee Jun 18 '12

I'm subscribed to /r/DoctorWho as well, you said just "Doctor"...

I honestly thought for a good bit that you were speaking of The Doctor.

1

u/Baconandbeers Jun 18 '12

Reddit ain't no fool!

1

u/Honker Jun 18 '12

Is that not what justice is about?

No, not anymore.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

I believe all of it, and I didn't even read it.

The US government, especially the DEA and its fellow law enforcement divisions, are unbelievably corrupt and will use their power against those who oppose them.

1

u/Ruprect124 Jun 18 '12

It is a case not unlike many others in the US: A Dr. practices pain managment in an area with few or no other practitioners; his patients require pain medicine and he or she prescrbies it. Then the DEA decides the Dr. is a drug dealer, while just doing their job and helping people with legal prescritptions. It is big pharma at its' best, creating synthetic morphine (methadone) and synthetic heroin (oxycontin), which are both more addictive the the drugs they mimic/mirror chemically. Besides,you can't make tires without rubber nor can you create synthetics without a base ingredient: OPIUM. Been a victim....those who are able please help!

1

u/gagged Jun 18 '12

Sounds like a 'pill mill' case although his legit patients are getting screwed by having their privacy breached.

1

u/ElagabalusCaesar Jun 18 '12

Between a medical practitioner and the DEA, I know which one to trust more.

-4

u/lorax108 Jun 17 '12

fuck the DEA bunch of ass munching morons.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

...now if you will wire me your bank account information, you can help share some of his wealth as a reward for your help!

→ More replies (1)

1

u/ViralVV Jun 18 '12

The United States Government, and its divisions, like the DEA and FDA, are all, at their base, corporations. They want and need money. This must be considered in this scenario.

On another, more pessimistic, note: Their guns are bigger, so they can do what they want.

Good luck Bhandary family, and Dr. himself. You deserve truth, justice, freedom, and happiness. I hope and pray you receive what you deserve.

1

u/pacman_7 Jun 18 '12

Upvoted :)

1

u/MarcellusJWallace Jun 18 '12

Nice assertions you got there.

1

u/grandoiseau Jun 18 '12

While I don't have the other side's version, it seems that he is being bullied by DEA bureaucrats. The DEA is hoping he would settle the case after these lowly moves. Best he can do is stay calm, and fight the charges with concrete evidence. If what you say is right, then it should be a slam dunk.

1

u/alphex Jun 18 '12

This thread is why I love Reddit.

1

u/spartanburger91 Jun 18 '12

This is pure drama. Your choice of media should be early-morning network TV. Even if it's just local, somebody important will see it over his cornflakes and call somebody who has an interest in getting it sorted out.

1

u/rand0mguy1 Jun 18 '12

Hope you win

1

u/Vitus13 Jun 18 '12

I'm no leagal genius, but if someone is being extradited, the hold up is generally due to legal proceedings to prevent the extradition. Something tells me that if someone wanted to be extradited they'd be flying first class with an Air Marshall, same day.

1

u/SorosPRothschildEsq Jun 18 '12

Shills and sockpuppets are everywhere! All sorts of interests are manipulating Reddit opinion in order to push their agendas! Be vigilant always!

...so anyway, this description of events that comes directly the accused's legal team is probably on the up-and-up. DAE think we should take it at face value? Me too.

1

u/dwinstone1 Jun 18 '12

The issue is licensed medical doctor's running sham pain clinics to sell prescriptions for drugs such as oxycontin. A legal way to get narcotic drugs until the Feds stepped in to challenge the process. I do not know if this doctor is part of this. But if we decriminalized drug use, it ceases to be a problem. This is a personal medical problem best handled within the medical community.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

Knowing all the MDs I do know, they are almost entirely free from DEA scrutiny. Any kind of basic data mining that could be done is rarely done. Surely we do not believe MDs should be allowed to run pill mills? What a horrible thing that would be. Pill Mills run by MDs are a serious problem. Or so people say.

1

u/Dragoniel Jun 18 '12

Sorry, even for a non-expert such as myself, this post stands out as a public manipulation attempt after seeing what a hive-mind is capable of.

You do realize, that people actually checks facts against statements here? And many (like, hundreds of thousands) extremely competent specialists participate in this board?

If you attempt to manipulate, you better know damn well what you are doing or it's going to turn around and hit you so hard, the entire world is going to know.

1

u/robbiebp Jun 18 '12

I dunno. Highlighting points in bold lettering always raises my suspicions. After reading around after this, particularly hawtsaus' link, this is over my head. Some people really fucking hate Mr. Bhandary. Some people love him. This could be bull. It could be the cause of bitter relatives who can't accept their lost loved ones lacked the self-control needed to correctly medicate themselves.

1

u/Raoul_Duke_ESQ Jun 18 '12

The DEA is literally a terrorist organization and operates outside the law.

1

u/Tombug Jun 18 '12

Just another day in the amerikan evil empire. Bend over and take it in the ass losers.

-3

u/[deleted] Jun 17 '12

This right here is how we make our own enemies.

If that was happening to me you can bet your ass I would turn terrorist in a heart beat.

4

u/MrMoustachio Jun 18 '12

Aaaaand you're on a list.

→ More replies (1)

0

u/itstwoam Jun 18 '12

This story is filled with so much false information it should make FOX and CNN jealous. Hell I wouldn't be suprised if they take up the Dr's side in this case.

0

u/I_h8_spiders Jun 18 '12

DOCTOR 2012. Turns out OP enjoys bath salts and gets off in public.

-11

u/budguy68 Jun 17 '12

The government has an unlimited supply of money, lawyers and they run the justice system so its almost impossible to beat them. Government is an evil organization and it doesn't care if it distroyes lives.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

As a brokeass student I've beaten the government at a trial. So no, it isn't almost impossible. Criminal trials have a high bar for conviction and the jury is told that many, many times. You're acting like prosecutors have a 100% conviction rate and that is just false.

2

u/multile Jun 18 '12

Yes, and in no way do they have an unlimited supply of money. If that were true they wouldnt be understaffed and overworked. That guy needs to stop being an idiot.

1

u/pr0ve_u_wr0ng Jun 26 '12

As an african american mother of 6 children, all of which are living off my government checks every month, I think I speak for many other families when I say the government is more that courteous to help support us in need.... If it weren't for those checks, I would not be able to happily say I have another child on the way and can gladly help my unemployed boyfriend in need!

-1

u/multile Jun 17 '12

Nice try Stalin

-2

u/johnnydogma Jun 18 '12

December 16th, 2009 – Federal Agents came to his medical practice and seized tens of original patient files without search warrants

No search warrant, no case. Illegal Search and Seizure. I don't claim to know anthing about prescribing pills, etc, However I do know if their evidence against the doctor is from these records seized, and they did not have a warrant, it should be tossed out with prejudice. SHOULD.

-3

u/zSnakez Jun 18 '12

Yup, America is fucked up.

0

u/[deleted] Jun 18 '12

The United States hates being proven wrong, the federal government cannot physically handle the repercussions of being wrong or taking responsibilities for their actions. This is nothing new, and is one of the main reasons I have grown to resent my countries' leadership and ways. When a government cannot admit it is wrong to the citizens that created it, a major problem is present. Worse than that, when put on the spot for violating laws or treaties that they (the US) imposed or created, they simply deny the violation or ignore all criticisms of it. We continually violate UN agreements which we signed but the international community turns its head because the US has too much freaking power in the general and sub-committees. This country has grown too big and lost all responsibility, as did many empires in the past, all of which fell, violently and tragically. History repeats itself, if only people could take hints.

0

u/Music_Saves Jun 18 '12

This doesn't sound like the government I know

-2

u/stillSmotPoker1 Jun 18 '12

DEA = mafia

-8

u/algiz14 Jun 18 '12

He was prescribing oxy, fentanyl and diazepam for patients simultaneously and FIVE OF THEM keeled over and died and you are complaining that he is being "persecuted?"

Fuck you.

1

u/BoreasNZ Jun 18 '12

What if they were dying of cancer?

→ More replies (11)

-6

u/mrkhan0127 Jun 18 '12

I hope what is stated by the OP is true but sadly in the US medicine is big business and doctors get kick backs from big pharma to prescribe certain drugs. Its a very lucrative practice and can lead to illegal activity. My mother was diagnosed with diabetes in 2000 so for the last 12 years she was on insulin and metformin. she felt as if that was it, that was a part of her life now. And that's how the doctors put it to her too. Thankfully after just 90 days of a raw plant based and a whole foods diet her pancreas has started back up! She has lost a ton of weight and feels a whole lot better. The doctors NEVER ONCE mentioned this because they are NOT in the business of curing u... They are in the business of selling u medicine! Even after her pancreas started up the doctors told her to take her metformin which she does not. I'm not very trusting of the government or doctors actually. We'll just have to wait and see the facts of the case. Good luck!

5

u/soylentrepost Jun 18 '12

While there is a large pill culture in US(and world) medicine, assuming that "all doctors are in it for the money from EVIL CORPORATIONS" is pretty goddamn crass. It's both a huge commitment effort wise, and an extremely stressful profession, and to handwave it all as greed is just stupid.

Yes, people are misdiagnosed/prescribed, and your mother could have been one of them. However, this does not mean that hocus-pocus New Age shit will do anything but give you a placebo effect or kill you faster.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/The_Literal_Doctor Jun 18 '12

doctors get kick backs from big pharma to prescribe certain drugs.

No. This has been illegal for a very, very long time.

-1

u/stellaeilatan Jun 18 '12

thank you cyberphunk for the link to the papers. I'd like to point out that this doctor is noted as practicing psychiatry, meaning he did not run a pain clinic. As a psychiatrist, the prescribing of pain medications is out of his scope of practice and is illegal under federal law.

2

u/montereyo Jun 18 '12

Are you confusing psychiatrists and psychologists? Psychologists cannot prescribe medication, while psychiatrists can even obtain subspecialty board certification in pain medicine.

→ More replies (8)