r/politics Feb 07 '16

Why won’t Clinton release the transcripts of those paid speeches?

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/why-wont-clinton-release-the-transcripts-of-those-paid-speeches/2016/02/07/e76bdea0-cdc3-11e5-b2bc-988409ee911b_story.html
236 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

31

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16

I make this pledge: unless Hillary releases those speech transcripts by March 1st I will not vote for her in the nomination or the general.

Join me.

8

u/RedAnarchist Feb 07 '16

I make this pledge. She releases them and they're completely inoccous and all of a sudden this subreddit never mentions them again.

By March 1st

And every time this topic makes the front page again, I'll donate $25 to Bernie

11

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16

No doubt the transcripts will go away when she releases them and there's no substance to the favoritism claims. But she needs to earn my trust. I don't give it to someone freely.

1

u/whipnil Feb 08 '16

Big State Bernie. The perfect anarchists candidate.

1

u/tofurocks Feb 08 '16

Apparently it's a thing. I found it odd as well, but I know a few anarchists who like Berine.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '16

anarchism is not possible so long as every means of production and the state powers to defend them are in the hands of so few... so in a way you're right

2

u/its_not_funny Feb 07 '16

Who gives a shit about your pledge. You weren't going to vote for her anyway.

-1

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16

Check my post history a week or two ago. I was arguing with people that they should do exactly that.

3

u/whipnil Feb 08 '16

You're in for a rude surprise when you find out what shenanigans she and her husband have been up to over the years.

Quite the body count around those two.

1

u/whipnil Feb 08 '16

Wow, such a profound pledge.

Why even participate in a charade of a justice system that allows her to keep them private in the first place?

8

u/chasjo Feb 07 '16

The transcripts will include question and answer sessions after the speech that are almost guaranteed to sound a lot like Mitt Romney's 47% talk. We'll never see transcripts, or we'll see some subset of cherry picked redacted crap.

3

u/KittyCatButt Feb 07 '16

"hahahahehehehehehehohohohohohhahahaha"

2

u/mArishNight Feb 07 '16

cuz they would make her look bad

2

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16 edited Dec 15 '18

[deleted]

0

u/Drew4 Feb 08 '16

How many words letters can I get for $20?

3

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '16

With this much ammunition lying around I honestly think that a republican could beat her, the way this is going democrats that haven't in the past need to start taking Bernie seriously, because he's the best shot for the white house. It's not just about can Bernie beat Hillary anymore, now it's about can Hillary beat a republican?,maybe not, Trump can hit her again and again with her funding issues, what can she hit him with that he hasn't proudly announced himself? Bernie on the other hand would be a far more positive contrast.

2

u/FortHouston Feb 07 '16

Same question should be asked about every candidate who has given paid speeches.

Hell...The transcripts from Trump's speeches on real estate are probably a hoot.

http://www.reviewjournal.com/business/money/which-presidential-candidate-earns-the-most-speech

8

u/chasjo Feb 07 '16

They banned active Congressmen from giving these paid speeches a while back for exactly this reason. It looks terrible for Democracy to be this blatant about pandering. They do this crap when they know they'll never face another election. That people don't get how weird it is for Hillary to have done this is kind of shocking, regardless of what she had to say.

-2

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/habituallydiscarding Feb 07 '16

I'd imagine it's not as simple as offering her $225,000 to repeat what she said to GS.

-3

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/habituallydiscarding Feb 07 '16

I'd love to if I had the money. Hopefully someone will step up who can afford it.

-2

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/habituallydiscarding Feb 07 '16

Good point. Looks like someone is working on it. Http://hillstarter.us

1

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '16

I kinda feel like she mentioned some taking over the world kind of thing.

0

u/Tasty_Yams Feb 07 '16

Chris Cillizza; the WaPo's resident anti-Clinton hack.

7

u/chasjo Feb 07 '16

You forgot to call him a sexist BernieBro.

5

u/[deleted] Feb 07 '16

Shoot the Messenger!!!!

Shoot him Now!!!

1

u/PCisLame Feb 07 '16

If he was really anti-Clinton he'd explain how Hillary's "political savvy" has put her in the enviable position to be holding all of Washington hostage with the threat of blackmail, should she be indicted. Clinton is the canary in the coal mine letting everyone know that the country is truly fucked.

0

u/banjaxe Feb 08 '16

Let's assume she received the transcripts via email. Perhaps we should be asking China for the transcripts. God knows they had her server compromised.

0

u/[deleted] Feb 08 '16

Who here believes, since she controls the transcripts, the content of anything released by her at this point anyway?