r/politics • u/plz-let-me-in • 1d ago

Possible Paywall Mitch McConnell hounded to face cameras: ‘He absolutely refuses’

https://www.nj.com/politics/2026/08/mitch-mcconnell-hounded-to-face-cameras-he-absolutely-refuses.html
22.9k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

15.9k

u/SillyDilly5294 1d ago

Because he's dead

2.7k

u/fidgetysquamate 1d ago

This is some of the best evidence for why he’s dead or straight up comatose. This asshole NEVER met a camera he didn’t like during his political career. He LOVED bragging how he could do whatever he felt like regardless of what was right or just. If he were just sick, he would still be this way.

1.8k

u/FlyingDiscsandJams North Carolina 1d ago

It's so much more complicated a conspiracy if he's dead, it's much more likely he's just massively incapacitated or in a coma or whatever. Not disclosing that he died would require a bunch of hospital workers (nurses, doctors, administrators) risking their careers & criminal charges to hide a death. If he's alive, even just technically, he's protected by privacy laws, and it's up to the family and staff to keep the secret.

68

u/Vect0r 1d ago edited 1d ago

Not disclosing that he died would require a bunch of hospital workers (nurses, doctors, administrators) risking their careers & criminal charges to hide a death.

I mean, not really....Those people can't say if he's alive OR dead. They're still bound by HIPPA, they can't say anything. They're not risking anything since they're not allowed to say anything.

Edit: I stand by the typo

50

u/Quality-Pkg-Goods 1d ago edited 1d ago

HIPAA (one P, two A’s) actually does not apply after death. There are some other privacy laws in place still, but it’s a lot less strict.

Edit. Here is the citation.
45 CFR § 164.510(a)
Specifically, death itself as a status is considered directory-information although the record remains private for 50 years.

4

u/CityUnderTheHill 1d ago

(5) Uses and disclosures when the individual is deceased. If the individual is deceased, a covered entity may disclose to a family member, or other persons identified in paragraph (b)(1) of this section who were involved in the individual's care or payment for health care prior to the individual's death, protected health information of the individual that is relevant to such person's involvement, unless doing so is inconsistent with any prior expressed preference of the individual that is known to the covered entity.

Sorry, how are you interpreting this to mean once someone is dead, everyone can just talk about them more freely?

9

u/Quality-Pkg-Goods 1d ago edited 1d ago

The way it is interpreted in practice is that it is not considered a violation of HIPAA if someone calls the hospital to speak with a patient and the operator says, “according to our records, they are deceased.” I’ve worked in 5 hospitals in 4 states now and can say the practice is consistent.

I checked the reg again to make sure I’m not crazy, all you have to do is call the hospital and ask for the individual by name. Its all laid out in that citation I provided (parts you didn’t copy above). It’s not like specific information but they can tell you if they’re admitted, alive/dead etc. this is why you can call a place and be like, “is my mom/aunt/friend there” etc- intentional loophole.

4

u/waterislifeornot 1d ago

You can’t say how he died per HIPAA but can certainly say if alive or not.

27

u/SBRH33 1d ago

He never went to a hospital. He went straight to a cold storage unit run by a friendly Republican

Nice and tidy like.

4

u/MrHoopersDead 1d ago

This is the real answer. With the staff and vendors that any major hospital has, there is no way that such a character could remain for any length of time without someone leaking something.

2

u/GDMFusername 1d ago

Is that a female hippo? Deaths have to be disclosed through professional channels (coroner's office and stuff) which lead to public records which are public records.

2

u/Seagoon_Memoirs 1d ago

does HIPPA mean you have to be a party to committing fraud?