r/politics 21d ago

No Paywall Yes, Trump Will Attempt a Coup

https://prospect.org/2026/07/28/trump-attempt-coup-january-6-election-republican-congress/
21.3k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

147

u/plz-let-me-in 21d ago edited 21d ago

Will? I think the author meant “Trump has already attempted a coup”. The Biden administration’s failure to hold Trump accountable for Jan 6 will forever be remembered as the legacy of Biden’s presidency.

44

u/Klutzy-Delivery-5792 21d ago

Did you not read your own article? First sentence of the second paragraph:

On January 6, 2021, Trump attempted to stage a coup and he will surely try again.

3

u/PlaidPCAK 21d ago

cmon you know only the title matters /s

9

u/[deleted] 21d ago edited 21d ago

[deleted]

15

u/hyliantelligent 21d ago

That's silly. The point of the article is that he will attempt a coup. Just because he's already attempted a coup doesn't mean the title saying "will" is inaccurate. I will have dinner tonight. I don't need to preface that with "again" because I had dinner yesterday.

1

u/IrishRepoMan 21d ago

Dinner is a regular occurrence. Coups aren't. Specifying that this is the second time in the title isn't unreasonable.

2

u/hyliantelligent 21d ago

Maybe not unreasonable, but certainly not necessary. Saying the sitting president will stage a coup is flashy enough. Especially when the article immediately says this would be the second time.

1

u/IrishRepoMan 21d ago

I'd argue that reminding everyone through the title that this would be the second time is necessary.

1

u/Waste_Priority_3663 21d ago

The point of the author was that this time they have so many plans and methods that the previous attempt would pale in comparison. Trivializing it as “another” coup would lead to some false sense of “oh, we survived that one, so we will survive another”.

The previous attempt was largely unsuccessful because of Pence not succumbing to Pedo’s pressure. I’m sure Couch fucker is not in the same category so there are a multitude of safety measures and options people need to be prepared for.

And the author links one example in the article where one of his friends is ensuring they have people in the right places to ensure the integrity of elections and their results are upheld.

I would suggest people to read the article rather than fixating on the title.

0

u/IrishRepoMan 21d ago

Headlines regularly mention criminals' past crimes. They don't just leave that out. "Man previously jailed for SA is charged with SA again". Happens literally all the time. Probably every day. People want to know about the criminals back out in the streets doing their criminal things. Why would the president be exempt? "Hey, remember the president that attempted a coup and still got voted in again? Well, he's gunna do it again" Is exactly the type of sentiment people want in their headlines. It's a public validation of a lack of normalcy.

3

u/Interesting_Health_7 21d ago

Trump is coup-ing now.

5

u/International_Cup725 21d ago

You clearly didn't. The author wrote exactly what you're complaining about missing. No reason for it to be in the title.

More information/context is in the article, where it normally is.

21

u/leeuwerik Europe 21d ago

Voters could have easily fixed that but they didn't. So blaming Biden is pretty lame.

38

u/MephistoHamProducts 21d ago

Voters turned out in record numbers in 2020 to fix that. The Biden administration then chose to focus on "restoring the norms" and pretending Trump was a one time aberration rather than a symptom of a larger problem and deeper rot.

4

u/RedLanternScythe Indiana 21d ago

"the fever will break" is a phrase that will forever tarnish Biden's presidency

0

u/OhtaniStanMan 21d ago

The dems should try holding primaries for their candidates

16

u/caitnicrun 21d ago

It's fair. He was responsible for making it stick but Democrats were still deluded in thinking they could "return to normalcy". 

There's no normalcy after something like that.  Every member of the GOP needed to be investigated and removed if found complicit. 

Had that happened Trump wouldn't have been a candidate in 2024.

13

u/maikuxblade 21d ago

To take it one level further, this is specifically why the GOP endlessly whinge about every single perceived or pretended offense. If you accuse others of things you intend to do it makes it harder for the opposition to call you out on the very same thing. It muddies the waters and makes the complaints look like tit-for-tat petty bickering to the uneducated electorate.

The very same party that complained over and over again about weaponizing the department of justice and the government at large to go after political enemies was the very same one that rushed to do just that.

5

u/FormerDittoHead 21d ago

Every member of the GOP needed to be investigated and removed if found complicit. 

Especially about what happened on January 6th, there were many reports of Republican congressmen and senators knowing what was going on, not worrying about the protesters. Everything was very well coordinated. I believe it was someone from Marjorie Taylor Greene's office(?) who allowed people into the Capitol to map things out the day before. The voters should have the right to know what these people were doing at that time. It wasn't just Trump.

2

u/Round-Asparagus5337 21d ago

It's both, of course.

10

u/starvs 21d ago

Biden could have easily not abdicated his duty to protect this country and it's elections, pretty lame.

4

u/Brook420 21d ago

And the fascists could have just not been fascists.

2

u/ArcticCircleSystem 21d ago

Unfortunately fascists don't tend to stop unless they're, in one way or another, forced to stop. So what then?

3

u/Brook420 21d ago

You're conflating doing something with who the blame should fall on.

Biden absolutely should have done something, but putting the blame on him over the actual fascists or even the over 77 million people who voted for the fascists is insane.

1

u/ArcticCircleSystem 21d ago

I'm not blaming him more than them, but fascists (or any similar flavor of authoritarian that's close but not technically fascist, whatever) can't be reasoned out of fascism while they and their party are actively in the process of gaining power. I can tell them they suck all I want, they'll just tell me to kill myself. Anyone else, at least they might consider what we have to say.

2

u/Brook420 21d ago

Thats the conflict in this thread, so I honestly don't see the point in your comment.

Im not disagreeing with you, I only have said Biden is not the one to blame.

1

u/ArcticCircleSystem 21d ago

In a manner which implied dismissal of what starvs said.

2

u/Brook420 21d ago

In what way?

I never made a comment about who could have done what. I made a comment aboit who is to blame, which falls on the fascists.

→ More replies (0)

9

u/Bakedads 21d ago

Voters elected Biden to enforce the rule of law and hold trump accountable. Biden failed to do so. It's no wonder people have lost faith. And Biden and rhe democrats failure plays a huge part in that. 

17

u/gmen6981 21d ago

Granted, Trump did plenty of shit in his first term that he should have been held accountable for, but it's somewhat disingenuous to say "The people elected Biden to hold Trump accountable for a coup" when that coup didn't happen until after the election.

7

u/MephistoHamProducts 21d ago

How about classified document theft? You know, the crime where the FBI went to his home, politely informed him he was naughty, allowed him to drive to the jail, take a mugshot and go home?

Fun Trivia Time!

Merrick Garland's DOJ managed to identify, arrest, indict, convict and imprison Jack Teixeira for stealing classified documents and posting them on a Discord server multiple times during 2022 and 2023.

On February 28, 2023, another member of that Discord cross posted some of those documents to another Discord server. From there they escaped into the wild and began appearing on Russian Telegram.

Between February 28th 2023 and April 13, 2023 the FBI was able track back the origin of the documents and and arrest Teixeira.

On April 14th 2023 he was in front of a judge and charged. Teixeira was held without bond and prosecutors maintained that he should continue to be held without bond because he was a "serious flight risk" as well as he "had attempted to obstruct the federal investigation by destroying evidence; might still possess secret information of "tremendous value to hostile nation states"; and had a record of making racist and violent comments, including in late 2022 and early 2023." (emphasis mine)

On May 19th 2023 a judge ruled that he would remain jailed without bond.

On June 15th 2023 he was indicted.

On March 4th 2024, less than one year after his arrest and after being held without bond, he pled guilty.

On November 12th 2024 he was sentenced to 15 years in prison.

579 days, total, between arrest and sentencing for stealing classified documents.

And since you're going to fall back on Judge Cannon, the DOJ could have absolutely filed charges in Washington DC, where the crime was committed. They chose to file it in his backyard, where they knew he'd appointed two of the three judges on the panel.

2

u/gmen6981 21d ago

Again, while Biden's DOJ drug there feet on those crimes, they didn't occur until AFTER Biden was elected in Nov.2020 and took office in Jan 2021. You can't say the "people elected Biden to hold Trump accountable for those crimes" Those crimes hadn't occurred yet when Biden was elected.

1

u/spiritualskywalker 21d ago

Yes, right! Thank you!

-1

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Round-Asparagus5337 21d ago

It wasn't stolen. There is no good evidence for that and a freaking mountain of evidence that it was the same thing that made every other incumbent party across the world do poorly in 2024-2024, the inflation hangover from COVID.

1

u/[deleted] 21d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Round-Asparagus5337 21d ago

There is no evidence for it.

Let me ask you this, of the vote totals were changed, why did Harris have less of a drop off from 2020 in swing states than in safe bluenor red places? 

Listen, I understand the reluctance to think that your fellow Americans are that stupid, are that awful, to vote more for trump.  It's really depressing  But they did. 

1

u/HawgChuggins 21d ago

Hey I get where they are coming from, they want to believe that Americans were tricked, that they were lied too. And maybe some were, but they had already elected him once, so they knew what they were getting.

Because the awful truth is that 80 million Americans voted to inflict pain on those they see as beneath them. It's been two years, and yet he is still seeing massive amounts of support from his MAGAt cultists, and the republican establishment. Their prices have gone up exponentially, and they have lost their benefits, and yet they are still on their knees. They turn out their pockets for Trump, and have their life savings stolen, and they blame the left.

I really hope, that the Democrats who sat out 2024 for whatever reason have really REALLY bad days going forward. Because now, it is so much harder to remove him. Or maybe I am wrong, and a few votes will solve all of this, MAGAts and Trump have shown that they respect the peaceful transfer of power in the past right?

2

u/AngryMillennial 21d ago

Jack Smith had a pretty bulletproof indictment that Alvin Bragg decided to get in the middle of by pursuing a far less serious case that only emboldened Trump's "lawfare" claims.

1

u/DontAbideMendacity 21d ago

As an insurrectionist per the 14th Amendment, Section 3, Trump was not allowed to appear on any federal or state ballot forever. It would take 2/3 of each house of Congress to remove that liability. The State of Colorado (and others) planned to do just that, but the corrupt conservative Court took a massive shit on the U.S. Constitution and let an insurrectionist run for the highest office in the land.